Bigfoot DNA

[calwaterbear]

I can't think of anywhere other than a science journal where something of such magnitude should go. The science community wouldn't accept it any other way. Especially if the aim is to prove the existence of this totally unrecognized branch of human beings.

Just to be clear:
3 billion base pairs will not fit into a scientific journal! not even close. I forget the analogy exactly, but it is something like 23 volumes of a book, each volume 1000 pages long, filled with nothing but A&T and C&G. There would be a discriptive paper published somewhere, probably Science or Nature, describing what the genome is, and justifying it. of course that assumes that there is actually a genome, and it has been analysed and vetted.

It would have to be posted in either GenBank, or some other metadata data base. thats why these sites like genbank exist, to give scientists open access to these huge data bases. Anyone in the world, (who knows what they are doing) can go into Gen bank and look at sequences in the human Genome. they can also look at and compare sequences for hundreds of thousands of other plants and animals.

The Genome could be posted before any discriptive paper, so thats not an excuse for a delay in releasing the data. but of course, it would then be available publically for anyone to start their own analysis.

So you will now see the same delay and obtusificate campaign over the next 3 years, that was pioneered by Melba. The supposed story line will parrallel the Melbas DNA paper game plan, that has fooled some 3 or 4 people over the past 4 years!

"we have it, but it has to remain secret, it is far to powerfull to allow someone as insignificant as scientists to actually see whats behind the curtasin!

 

[Sonny2]

I can't think of anywhere other than a science journal where something of such magnitude should go. The science community wouldn't accept it any other way. Especially if the aim is to prove the existence of this totally unrecognized branch of human beings.

I agree, OS, on the science journal part - but how do you figure this is an unrecognized branch of human beings? Not just a wood ape?

 

[Jodie]

Considering the source for the article was "ascension earth" all it is regurgitating the same rumors we've been hearing about. I thought Jerrywayne was joking when he posted the link.

 

[Sonny2]

Considering the source for the article was "ascension earth" all it is regurgitating the same rumors we've been hearing about. I thought Jerrywayne was joking when he posted the link.

Oh, I didn't realize he meant that one. Thought he was talking in generalities.

 

[jerrywayne]

Considering the source for the article was "ascension earth" all it is regurgitating the same rumors we've been hearing about. I thought Jerrywayne was joking when he posted the link.

Looked like an obvious woo-hood site to me.

 

[calwaterbear]

I think you guys are missing the point. yes this website is all woo, but it is meerly reporting on what BoBo said on national TV. Makes absolutely no difference to me that this is a woo site, thats irrelevant. the issue before us is: Is the genome out there? if so, who did it?, and is it available for open examination?

There must be something out there, i can't see BoBo backing himself into a corner, without having an out.

 

[RedRatSnake]

There must be something out there, i can't see BoBo backing himself into a corner, without having an out.

Remember you're talking about a footer, plenty of ways to double talk ones way out, missing or corrupted data, sabotage Etc.

 

[Castro]

Remember you're talking about a footer, plenty of ways to double talk ones way out, missing or corrupted data, sabotage Etc.

or the traditional "tomorrow you will know".

 

[Sonny2]

I don't think Bobo thinks far anough ahead to see a corner to back into or not. You're giving him too much credit. He's sucked in by the drama and TV BS and can't see any further than the credits at the end of the show.

 

[AlaskaBushPilot]

There must be something out there, i can't see BoBo backing himself into a corner, without having an out.

Hi calwaterbear

That's the problem with normal people trying to figure out what disordered people are doing based on projecting their own normal thinking onto them.

Most people do not tell bold faced lies. They have a conscience. Being caught in a lie is an embarassment to them.

If you remove your own conscience and look upon others that have a conscience as a weakness you can exploit then you lie to their faces. Because they would never do such a thing, and will have a hard time believing anyone else would.

They've been lying for so long they have developed a battery of off-the-shelf responses to being caught in their lies, or how to lie in ways that give them an escape.

I can't see someone sadistically killing dozens of women while at the same time being the governor's assistant and suicide prevention line counselor. How about a commander of an air base raping, killing, and taking pictures of himself with bras and panties of the women he killed. Meeting the Queen of England one moment in the most dignified majesty, and strangling his female subordinate in a fit of sexual depravity the next.

We have to toss out our models of normal thinking in the bigfoot arena just as we do for other disordered personalities. They do not apply.

 

[Jodie]

There must be something out there, i can't see BoBo backing himself into a corner, without having an out.

Unless he's seen what Bart Cutino had done with Justin's sample or the bloody boots, then I think he's just like everyone else, repeating hearsay thinking it's fact. The out would be , "Well I guess I was wrong". He tends to contradict himself a lot in interviews just regurgitating bull crap.

 

[rockinkt]

I think everybody is forgetting the fact that Footers do not have to "have an out".
When was the last time you heard a prominent Footer admit that he/she was wrong and that the facts that they were espousing or the predictions that they were making were erroneous?

The entire phenomenon is based on lies, innuendo and false predictions and the vast majority of the cornerstone lies, innuendos, and false predictions have been shown to be false and/or ill-founded.

Has that resulted in any admission of failure or error on the part of the prominent Footers? Certainly not!
Bigger lies, bluster, purse waving and finger pointing is always the reaction to the truth by prominent Footers.

BoBo is in safe territory no matter what he says.


(I use the term "prominent Footer" purposefully as there are the few who are skeptical of much that goes on in the world of Bigfoot and take a lot of heat for doing so. John Cartwright comes to mind as straight shooter who is searching for answers that he himself must find for his own peace of mind. Wolftrax, Bitter Monk, Volsquatch, also deserve much credit for their intellectual honesty.)

 

[DennyT]

calwaterbear:
In the DVD/video Sasquatch: Science Meets Legend, at 7 minutes in, a Dr. Craig Newton of "BC Research" runs samples from the Skookum impression/cast. He is looking for nuclear DNA "targets", continuing on to the next video, and finds "human sequences" which he seems to write off as "contamination." He says that people will have to be more careful in collecting samples.

Obviously there isn't much information here, sorry, but...

My question is, in the general case, how does one make the distinction between human contamination and human hair?

 

[calwaterbear]

He seemed to indicate it came from the sierra steak samples, which is interesting in its own right. didn't Melba have possession of that? maybe she is working out of a secret underground bunker. probably using SY as her channel of communication! At least thats what SY says!

 

[GT/CS]

Who is SY?

 

[Sonny2]

I find it almost impossible to believe that all this has come from some redneck's wild story about shooting BF. Just incomprehensible to me.

 

[DennyT]

He seemed to indicate it came from the sierra steak samples, which is interesting in its own right. ...

no; this is long before the Sierra steak.

 

[MikeG]

Who is SY?

Sweaty Yeti, I presume. A member here and of the BFF.......and mainly interested in the PGF.

Mike

 

[calwaterbear]

no; this is long before the Sierra steak.

Parn, I assume the mod status is messing us up here. I am commenting on the report in the assention earth woo rag. It indicates that the sample came from someone in the sierras shooting an adult and child bigfoot, blowing off tissue from the animals, but-+ apparently not killing them. I took that to be the sierra steak.

I was not familiar with the videos you posted, but in general to answer your question, if the DNA sequnce comes back human, you either have a human, or a human contaminated the sample at some point. That was melbas problem, she kept getting human sequence, thats when she changed her mind and desided BF must be human, which seems to me, if that is the case, then Bigfoots would be the same as any group of humans, probably smarter than a pack of swedes, but nothing more that a population of humans. so how is tha bf? anyway I always looked forward to that interpritation, because if in fact they ever do publish a genome, it would be shown in, probably 24 hours, to be nothing more than modern humans, just like the guy down at the corner barbershop.

So I gyuess we are still in the dark, the "scoop" I read clearly identified it as the Sierra steak samples.

 

[rockinkt]

Who is SY?

I think they are referring to Southern Yahoo from the BFF boards.