• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Bigfoot DNA

Status
Not open for further replies.
Conference organizers know in advance what the speaker topic is going to be about. If her talk is a personal bail-out or total collapse of the project (her saying it isn't Bigfoot), then a lot of attendees are going to be angry with the organizers for not warning them.
 
LTC8K6 said:
My money is on the 100% human announcement and then ROFL type ridicule...

They all call out "I am bigfoot!"
Click to expand...

Funny enough, that is close to the truth. It is those enthusiasts that often "find" or create bigfoot evidence.
 
All of the stalling and shell game stuff just reeks of people trying to find a way out of their claims. The so called "bigfoot toenail" picture has caused Erickson to send nasty threats to several websites, demanding that they remove it from their page. On page even replaced it with their own artists rendering, and The EP demanded that they remove that too.
 
WP
I have been to a bigfoot conference and i seriously doubt that speakers submitted their content in advance. Maybe not even a meaningful title if the speaker is known.

I can't imagine she will be a viable forensic lab or witness if she pursues this much longer. Word gets around very quickly in the legal community. All it takes is one probing cross examination and her forensic business is caput.

What would be your guess on what she's gonna say?
 
Last edited:
Regarding letting the organizers know the details of the speakers' material, the Henner orgy fiasco comes to mind.





That should make for some interesting Google hits!
 
parnassus said:
I can't imagine she will be a viable forensic lab or witness if she pursues this much longer. Word gets around very quickly in the legal community. All it takes is one probing cross examination and her forensic business is caput.
Click to expand...

It's already too late now. Try putting her name into a Google search and see what you see. Bigfoot. Bigfoot. Bigfoot. The Scarlet Letter "B" is on her forehead.
 
What I find disturbing is that, if you look at this from the 'footer's point of veiw, they cant go wrong.

Say the DNA tests as "human" which is the rumors I keep hearing: In their mind they have no doubt that it came from a Bigfoot, so the "human" reading just makes them a relative of ours. They can't fathom the possibility that it came from a person. It's a sickness really.
 
parnassus said:
What would be your guess on what she's gonna say?
Click to expand...

Stuff that's already been said in the past. Stuff like:

The initial series of tests haved proved inconclusive, but they are potentially very exciting and promising. (2008)

or

The DNA has proven impossible to identify, and I've never encountered any DNA that I couldn't identify before. (2001)

RayG
 
RayG said:
Stuff that's already been said in the past. Stuff like:

The initial series of tests haved proved inconclusive, but they are potentially very exciting and promising. (2008)

or

The DNA has proven impossible to identify, and I've never encountered any DNA that I couldn't identify before. (2001)

RayG
Click to expand...

I'm just wondering how long they think they can play this hand. Eventually someone is going to call them on this stuff, right? Or do they just ignore it when it happens?
 
Deacondark said:
I'm just wondering how long they think they can play this hand. Eventually someone is going to call them on this stuff, right? Or do they just ignore it when it happens?
Click to expand...

She already publicly said last year that if her paper is rejected by scientific journals it is because of anti-Bigfoot bias not because she made any error(s).
 
William Parcher said:
She already publicly said last year that if her paper is rejected by scientific journals it is because of anti-Bigfoot bias not because she made any error(s).
Click to expand...


It's never a good sign when someone sets up an "out" before the fact. Seems like she already knows they will be laughing at her.

"Footer Logic" strikes again.
 
'The findings are unlike any thing we've seen, however the Scientific Community has blackballed us and will not publish our findings. Until we publish we cannot give out any details about our findings'
 
Drewbot said:
'The findings are unlike any thing we've seen, however the Scientific Community has blackballed us and will not publish our findings. Until we publish we cannot give out any details about our findings'
Click to expand...


"But keep sending those checks, so we can continue justifying your beliefs, er, continue our important research."
 
A careful examination of Dr. Ketchums Facebook page reveals that she has a large interest in the "Twilight" Saga. Not much new info about Bigfoot DNA though.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom