Bigfoot Cast Collection Appears On Website

keywords: gorilla, Einstein, Galileo, coelocanth, platypus, George Schaller, Jane Goodall, Higgs boson, special pleading, conspiracy theory
 
Last edited:
I wonder how you get this "pine needles between the toes" effect from just stepping on the pine needles?

http://northamericanbigfoot.com/Database_casts/1960Byrne.html

And then there's this:

This cast (or at least the footprint photograph) is thought to be from the same individual that is shown in the Patterson/Gimlin film of 1967. Interestingly, her footprints were found on several occasions over the years leading up to the film, but never afterwards.
Click to expand...
 
LTC8K6 said:
I wonder how you get this "pine needles between the toes" effect from just stepping on the pine needles?

http://northamericanbigfoot.com/Database_casts/1960Byrne.html

And then there's this:
Click to expand...

This cast (or at least the footprint photograph) is thought to be from the same individual that is shown in the Patterson/Gimlin film of 1967. Interestingly, her footprints were found on several occasions over the years leading up to the film, but never afterwards.
Click to expand...

That's because Patterson and Gimlin blasted the holy bejeezus out of her then buried her body, along with 50 of her relatives!!!!!!

Oops, sorry, wrong web-site.

Never mind.:o
 
They say 'Cult Phenomena' never dies. Those who believe find it Fascinating-terrifying and Bizarre, it's what makes them WANT to believe. When REAL science examines Bigfoot they find it's NOT a complex Phenomenon at all, It just takes a unique lens (Meldrum) to examine and believe the myth.
 
This cast (or at least the footprint photograph) is thought to be from the same individual that is shown in the Patterson/Gimlin film of 1967. Interestingly, her footprints were found on several occasions over the years leading up to the film, but never afterwards.
Click to expand...
LT: where did this quote come from?
 
It doesn't look like the Wallace stompers, but it doesn't look like a Patterson print either. Too broad.
 
Have any of the Classic Era Bigfooters come right out and said that they were once fooled by Wallace Stompers?
 
geebus, Meldrum still believes in Freeman.

seriously, the official bigfoot line is that Wallace was either crazy or a liar or both. Or that his family is.
I'm serious. The response to the 2002 Wallace family revelations were basically the same as the response to the Long book in 2004: Shoot the messenger, and the source is lying or crazy.
the Wallace prints, the Freeman prints, and the Marx prints are all ok, according to bigfootery.
 
Last edited:
parnassus said:
geebus, Meldrum still believes in Freeman.

seriously, the official bigfoot line is that Wallace was either crazy or a liar or both. Or that his family is.
I'm serious. The response to the 2002 Wallace family revelations were basically the same as the response to the Long book in 2004: Shoot the messenger, and the source is lying or crazy.
the Wallace prints, the Freeman prints, and the Marx prints are all ok, according to bigfootery.
Click to expand...

Don't forget about the Skookum elk lay.
 
I'm looking for information on "cripplefoot." My understanding is that the cripplefoot print was found repeated many times over in a long track with an otherwise normal print, and that Grover Krantz was really impressed with this. Meldrum also supports the cripplefoot as authentic and has provided an explanation of the pathology he's inferred from the print, right?
 
I believe someone else said, that if Cripplefoot were real, then it would have to be from a completely different species of Bigfoot.
 
IIRC Napier pointed ou that the Cripplefoot did no match the Wallace type feet, meaning either on type (human type i.e. Cripplefoot vs Wallace foot) was fake, or there had to be two different species.
 
According to Dahinden in " Sasquatch" the trackway at Roosevelt Lake had "1,089 cleary defined tracks". A border patrol agent reported finding more of the same tracks on the opposite side of the river. The inference in "Sasquatch" is that this was a continuation of the first trackway (that ended at the river).
 
So . . . there should have been something like at least 500 prints of the "crippled" foot and at least 500 of the "normal" one to examine?

Has anyone ever critically examined the event itself? Anyone have a link to a photo of casts of both feet side-by-side? Much thanks for info.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom