Moderated Bigfoot- Anybody Seen one?

Status
Not open for further replies.
makaya325 said:
I NOW admit that i made a mistake and misread it.
Click to expand...

But, you told us the note was signed by a Mr. Roger Patterson. A receipt for a camera, I believe you said. It wasn't signed by Roger Patterson or it was?

You complain that I repeatedly call you a troll, and, yet, you continually post ambiguous answers, avoid questions altogether, and repeatedly contradict yourself. THAT'S why you appear to be a troll.
 
desertgal said:
But, you told us the note was signed by a Mr. Roger Patterson. A receipt for a camera, I believe you said. It wasn't signed by Roger Patterson or it was?
Click to expand...

Correct, but i made the assumption it was the BF roger patterson, which i was wrong. It was a Different roger patterson. If it was the bf patterson, i would have much more info by now.
You complain that I repeatedly call you a troll, and, yet, you continually post ambiguous answers, avoid questions altogether, and repeatedly contradict yourself. THAT'S why you appear to be a troll
Click to expand...
.

Instead of talking about me or labeling me a troll, you could just not talk to me and not mention my name anywhere here.
Click to expand...
 
makaya325 said:
Correct, but i made the assumption it was the BF roger patterson, which i was wrong. It was a Different roger patterson. If it was the bf patterson, i would have much more info by now.
Click to expand...

A different Roger Patterson who lived in Yakima at exactly the same time period. How 'bout that.

How did you establish that it wasn't the same RP? Did he sign it Roger "Not the future BF guy" Patterson?

Instead of talking about me or labeling me a troll, you could just not talk to me and not mention my name anywhere here.
Click to expand...

I could...but I probably won't. Put me on ignore if it bothers you that much.
 
Last edited:
desertgal said:
A different Roger Patterson who lived in Yakima at exactly the same time period. How 'bout that.
Click to expand...

My Grandpa went to Davis high school with a man by the name of Roger patterson. Didnt you say that it was impossible for my old man to have gone to school with rp?

How did you establish that it wasn't the same RP? Did he sign it Roger "Not the future BF guy" Patterson?
Click to expand...

There was no mention of a 16mm lense or "Making of bigfoot".



I could...but I probably won't. Put me on ignore if it bothers you that much.
Click to expand...

Why not?
 
makaya325 said:
There was no date ,only a transaction.
Click to expand...

You said your grandfather did not speak to Roger Patterson after their alleged high school years together, because Patterson didn't pay him back. If it was the BF Patterson, then it would have predated 1967.

Since there was no date, you can't be sure it wasn't the Roger Patterson.

Point is, you have no evidence that you didn't make up the entire story. Just more of your words, words, words, with nothing to back them up.

Tell us again you aren't trolling.
 
Makaya325 and Desertgal, stop the bickering and personal attacks or further moderator action is likely to follow.
Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: Cuddles
 
Last edited:
EHocking said:
My question was, did you spot the animals in the picture.

You missed the other lizard to the right of the Iguana. The one that looks like a monitor. Grey.

Thus demonstrating the point I was making, by your very own contradiction of your generalism, "A person is more likely to be correct in identifying a terrestrial animal than an animal in flight." is unsupportable.
Click to expand...

I spotted the animal that i FIRST saw. Did i not circle it for you?
 
Cuddles said:
Makaya325 and Desertgal, stop the bickering and personal attacks or further moderator action is likely to follow.
Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: Cuddles
Click to expand...

Tell desert to do me and her a favor and put me on ignore.
 
makaya325 said:
I spotted the animal that i FIRST saw. Did i not circle it for you?
Click to expand...
So you DIDN'T see both animals, I even gave you hints.

I don't believe that they have identified all of them it correctly.
Click to expand...
ETA: DID you find the animals in the photo?
Click to expand...
Therefore, we have both demonstrated for ourselves that land animals are NOT that easy to identify at all.

Your assertion that they are easier to ID that those in water or in the air can hardly kick off from a false initial premise.

ETA: For dog's sake, you started a THREAD about you not being able to identify a human-sized something in a bush not 10ft away from you and your father. Why are you persisting with this?

Just admit you have absolutely no basis for asserting that an animal on land is easier to see than one in the air or in water.
 
Last edited:
EHocking said:
So you DIDN'T see both animals, I even gave you hints.



Therefore, we have both demonstrated for ourselves that land animals are NOT that easy to identify at all.

Your assertion that they are easier to ID that those in water or in the air can hardly kick off from a false initial premise.

ETA: For dog's sake, you started a THREAD about you not being able to identify a human-sized something in a bush not 10ft away from you and your father. Why are you persisting with this
Click to expand...
?

Because this thing was TRANSPARENT (It had the chameleon affect), and refracted light. What was amazing was that it was blocking out part of the fence.

Just admit you have absolutely no basis for asserting that an animal on land is easier to see than one in the air or in water.
Click to expand...

You told me to Identify a CAMOFLAUGED ANIMAL. Why dont you give me an animal that isnt unique and actually exists in NW forests.
Click to expand...
 
desertgal said:
But, you told us the note was signed by a Mr. Roger Patterson. A receipt for a camera, I believe you said. It wasn't signed by Roger Patterson or it was?

You complain that I repeatedly call you a troll, and, yet, you continually post ambiguous answers, avoid questions altogether, and repeatedly contradict yourself. THAT'S why you appear to be a troll.
Click to expand...

He seems to have many aspects that's why I quit responding to him.
 
makaya325 said:
EHocking said:
So you DIDN'T see both animals, I even gave you hints.
Click to expand...
You told me to Identify a CAMOFLAUGED ANIMAL. Why dont you give me an animal that isnt unique and actually exists in NW forests.
Click to expand...
Keep moving those goal posts.

So now, if I have this straight, your assertion is that,

"Land animals that live in the PNW, but are not unique, and have hides, scales, skins or feathers that don't have any markings on them that might help them hide in their environment, that are not rather tiny and quick, don't look like Hummingbirds or moths and are not transparent, are easier to see than animals in the air or in the water".

I concede, you are definitely on to something here.
How could I have been so wrong...:rolleyes:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom