Moderated Bigfoot- Anybody Seen one?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Got sent this pic as evidence on the BFF (before I went down in a blaze of glory over there with the lunatic fringe)
[qimg][qimg]http://i687.photobucket.com/albums/vv240/macheesmo3/badbigfootpic.jpg[/qimg][/qimg]

The guy who sent it to me said it was caught on a game cam and wasn't very happy when I pointed out the polyester make up of the suit fabric....

Some people just will never face the truth. How could anyone think this was an animal?

It also appears that someone used the blur tool in photoshop on it. THe blur just doesn't look kosher to me.
 
Now they are over there discussing the link between Bigfoot and UFO's........

I have figured out that there are at least 3 kinds of Squatch believers:

Those who think they are magical and connect them with every sort of paranormal, bizarre attribute . (the crazies)

Those that claim to have had a sighting in person. It's something they can't explain and it intrigues them.(yet believe it's just an animal and not magic)

Those that have based their belief on the concept that "everybody can't be lying or wrong eh?" (again, no magic involved)

I can deal with the 2nd two, in the long run they are either mistaken or I am... Besides there is something there, in their opinion, but it's just a critter in the woods. I am not going to say it's IMPOSSIBLE for Bigfoot to exist. it's rather unlikely and there is no evidence to support this. But at least the latter 2 groups are reasonable people!

Seriously, how do we go from Bigfoot might be out there, to "he's a shape shifting, dimension jumping, EMF emitting, infrasound zapping, UFO riding man ape from the future?"
 
Seriously, how do we go from Bigfoot might be out there, to "he's a shape shifting, dimension jumping, EMF emitting, infrasound zapping, UFO riding man ape from the future?"

When you can't find one, or even evidence of one, and you need to believe, you have to explain the lack of evidence.

This came up initially, I think, because sasquatch tracks tend not to arrive or depart, they are just there. They needed to explain that.

They tend to just begin and end out of nowhere.

Like at Bluff Creek. Patty never walked in to the PGF site. Her tracks just begin creekside.

This is, of course, most likely because hoaxers are making the tracks.

I have remarked a number of times that bigfoot is very boring. He just appears, walks straight along, and then disappears. He never kicks a pine cone, or skips, or does a little dance, or plays in the mud with his toes, or runs and trips, etc. Just walks. Two of them never race each other.
 
Last edited:
LTC8K6

This came up initially, I think, because sasquatch tracks tend not to arrive or depart, they are just there. They needed to explain that.

That is a very good point, never thought of it that way.

Tim :)
 
Last edited:
Indeed I had never thought of that either, nor have I seen it discussed in regards to the PGF before! (RRS go stir up some trouble with this over there!)
 
The explanation for the lack of arrival tracks for the PGF site is that Patty walked in on the "hard" road...which explains nothing...

I have been a Bigfoot junky since I was a kid (yet never joined a bigfoot forum until a few months ago and after I did I figured out why) Yet something I had never heard discussed was the whole "where did the tracks come from?" argument! I guess it never popped into my head to even ask that question. (I reckon it's because I was usually too busy thinking that the tracks looked either faked or interesting, usually faked).

Thanx for making me consider this entire issue in a different manner!
 
I have been a Bigfoot junky since I was a kid (yet never joined a bigfoot forum until a few months ago and after I did I figured out why) Yet something I had never heard discussed was the whole "where did the tracks come from?" argument! I guess it never popped into my head to even ask that question. (I reckon it's because I was usually too busy thinking that the tracks looked either faked or interesting, usually faked).

Thanx for making me consider this entire issue in a different manner!

It fair to say you will learn squat of value on the subject at the BFF in it's present form, unless you want to "Jane Goodall" the crazies.
 
(RRS go stir up some trouble with this over there!)

LOL ~ I will pass on that i don't wish too totally destroy my rep in case i want to go back, besides it will make no difference at all, some want it so much that even Janice Carter's story's are making a come back, best to just leave them alone.

Tim :)
 
Now they are over there discussing the link between Bigfoot and UFO's........

I have figured out that there are at least 3 kinds of Squatch believers:

Those who think they are magical and connect them with every sort of paranormal, bizarre attribute . (the crazies)

Those that claim to have had a sighting in person. It's something they can't explain and it intrigues them.(yet believe it's just an animal and not magic)

Those that have based their belief on the concept that "everybody can't be lying or wrong eh?" (again, no magic involved)

I can deal with the 2nd two, in the long run they are either mistaken or I am... Besides there is something there, in their opinion, but it's just a critter in the woods. I am not going to say it's IMPOSSIBLE for Bigfoot to exist. it's rather unlikely and there is no evidence to support this. But at least the latter 2 groups are reasonable people!

Seriously, how do we go from Bigfoot might be out there, to "he's a shape shifting, dimension jumping, EMF emitting, infrasound zapping, UFO riding man ape from the future?"


If you walk into a room empty except for 2 guys and one guy says "There's a unicorn in this room" and the other one says "There's a unicorn in this room, but it's invisible, which is why you can't see it", you could certainly make a case that the second guy is less crazy than the first.
 
I posted on the JC thread figuring to get a laugh out of her using kids See n Says as a way to attract BF, never thought the thread would start getting serious posts.

My guess on the non loons ~ lol~ most just got bored with the small circle of evidence that keeps getting rehashed into new and crazier ways for BF to exist.


Tim :)
 
There are non-loon Bigfoot bleevers?

No, there aren't. But there are Bigfoot believers who will tell you that they shouldn't be regarded as loons. There are also folks who will tell you that a certain believer shouldn't be regarded as a loon.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom