Belz...
Fiend God
Reality is not a popularity contest.
I'm not the one who insists on using that term.
I don't think anything. I just see the words you insist on using. Your actions speak for you.
Being a racist while having a soft skull
- Thread starter TurkeysGhost
- Start date
-
- Tags
- assault incidents mod box
Reality is not a popularity contest.
I'm not the one who insists on using that term.
I don't think anything. I just see the words you insist on using. Your actions speak for you.
Belz...
Fiend God
He didn't read it.
Irrelevant.
The sick piece of **** livesd in the US and the law there says he was a pedo.
smartcooky
Penultimate Amazing
When he was charged with his sex crimes, he was 63, and he raped a 16/17 year old. Even here, he would be regarded as a sex offender.
Planigale's apologetics for this vile POS is disgusting... and creepy TBH.
It was from what I read statutary rape, because the victim was under the age of consent, the point I was making was that having sex with someone over 16 but under 18 (male or female) would be rape in Florida, but not in NZ or UK. Certainly having sex with someone over 16 would not fit with most definitions of being a 'pedo'.
We have to recognise 'gay bashing' is a real phenomenon, for some men merely being gay is a provocation to violence. This thread is about what is a justifiable provocation to violence. I do not think it is unreasonable to raise the issue whether as you seem to imply being gay is a provocation to be considered a mitigation to violence or whether killing a gay man should be regarded as a hate crime.
There is a long track record of people associating gay men with being child molesters. Finding young post pubescent men or women attractive is not pedophilia. I think one needs to be careful that posts do not use homophobic tropes.
OK,
I agree the highlighted would be regarded as a crime in most jurisdictions.
I was basing my post on the article referenced, you have obviously looked into things in more detail.
ponderingturtle
Orthogonal Vector
- Joined
- Jul 11, 2006
- Messages
- 54,545
Oh now you are fact checking right wing propaganda I see. They won't stand for that you know.
TurkeysGhost
Penultimate Amazing
- Joined
- Apr 2, 2018
- Messages
- 35,043
Lol this is exactly the kind of rap sheet that reactionaries dream about whenever a cop extrajudicially kills a member of the public.
Seems unambiguous that the thug here is the white career criminal and racist that got his melon thumped.
plague311
Great minds think...
I posted details of his crimes way back on page 17:
So none of this is particularly new information to the thread.
If we can't even accept as fact that Cook called Pujols the n-word, then your whole tangent about how this would be a hate crime against a gay man would be ridiculous. There is absolutely nothing anywhere that says anything anti-gay was uttered. Chances are the staff had no idea.
TurkeysGhost
Penultimate Amazing
- Joined
- Apr 2, 2018
- Messages
- 35,043
2 years house arrest for the Beverage Boxer, the Donut Death-Dealer, and the Racism Remover.
https://www.pennlive.com/crime/2022/03/dunkin-worker-sentenced-to-house-arrest-after-fatally-punching-irate-customer.html
Strikes me as strange they are requiring 200 hrs of community service. Pujols has already done his community a tremendous service.
https://www.pennlive.com/crime/2022/03/dunkin-worker-sentenced-to-house-arrest-after-fatally-punching-irate-customer.html
Strikes me as strange they are requiring 200 hrs of community service. Pujols has already done his community a tremendous service.
Last edited:
plague311
Great minds think...
200 hours is a lot of community service too. You're looking at 5 weeks if you're pulling 40 hours a week. He'll probably be doing community service on every day off he'll have for the next year.
That sucks, I feel bad for him. The house arrest is better than any prison\jail time though, so that's reasonable I think.
He seems like a good guy, hopefully things work out for him.
Thermal
August Member
Well yeah, you can relish that karma indirectly took care of what the justice system couldn't. But that doesn't mean the hommes here has a blank slate to be the Hammer of God, just kind of hoping that whoever he kills had it coming for previous crimes unknown.
johnny karate
... and your little dog too.
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2007
- Messages
- 18,524
Imagine that your trolling game becomes so terrible that you find yourself defending a pedophile.
johnny karate
... and your little dog too.
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2007
- Messages
- 18,524
I'm not, nor do I ever.
You seem very concerned about whether or not his death was justified. Why is that?
As I have stated already, I don't support pedos. This guy or any other. Some people are selective about the ones that they support or mourn for; I am not one of those people. I am still interested though, to hear from the vocal crowd here, why this guy deserved to die:
1) His criminal history
or
2) For calling someone a name
It's an important distinction. So far, nobody has clarified their position on this matter, other than Thermal.
Last edited:
arthwollipot
Limerick Purist
The phrase "deserved to be killed" gives me a profound sense of unease.
johnny karate
... and your little dog too.
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2007
- Messages
- 18,524
Introspection that you had no interest exploring when it was a white kid who killed a pedo. You couldn't dance on that guy's grave hard enough. Now suddenly you're asking for some kind moral examination from which you conveniently exempt yourself.
And it's very telling that you keep sanitizing what this guy did by referring to it as his "criminal history". Pretty much every time you posted about Rosenbaum you made some kind of graphic reference to his pedophilia. You relished it and did it at every opportunity.
But in the case of this pedo, no graphic references to his pedophilia, let alone repeatedly. Just his "criminal history".
Why is it that you pull your punches for a pedo killed by a black kid?
Why does this pedo merit that respect from you?