Basis of Immortality?

Peregrinus said:
Before Kumar arrived, who had even heard of A&F?
Click to expand...

I still have no idea what it means. I skim through the Kumar threads and keep seeing it, and I tried to search for the origin of it both here and on Google and failed. I just haven't bothered asking because I got the impression it wouldn't really have much of an impact on Kumar's arguments - that almost anything could be swapped out for "A&F" and it would be equally wrong.
 
Kumar said:
Why you want to continue with non A&F? Yes, one attribute of nature is destruction but it does not mean, wé should prefer it to keep on processing. The way, you anticipate suggest, you do not want ultimate levels. Is it so?
Click to expand...

Firstly, Kumar, my vote is for reality. Where did I say destruction is an attribute of nature? (Nature can be seen as having myriad attributes, none of which are under discussion here.) "Ultimate levels"? Just how in Tunket can there be levels to "ultimate"? Again, still, as ever, you make less than no sense at all.
 
Kumar said:
Kumar, who, other than you, has demanded that anything should be "A&F"? Please answer the question, with links to the posts where they did it.
Click to expand...
All índirectly. As I indicated. I have very good rémberance,
Click to expand...


Kumar, you are lying. Nobody has demanded that anything should be "A&F". That's why, despite your "very good rémberance", you are completely unable to link to posts where they have.
 
Mojo said:
Kumar, you are lying. Nobody has demanded that anything should be "A&F". That's why, despite your "very good rémberance", you are completely unable to link to posts where they have.
Click to expand...
It takes a very peculiar brand of - I'm not even sure whether words like enormous hubris and cognitive dissonance come close enough - of whatever you can call it to suggest that those of us who have hammered away for post after post in thread after thread saying there is no such thing as "A&F" and that the suggestion that anything be "A&F" is ignorant ill-educated baloney, have in any "indirect way" called for the very thing we condemn, berate and call utter nonsense.

Of course one must reckon with the ability of some posters to assert that black is white and true is false, so to call a person simply a liar might be too charitable an assessment of the problem. A liar does, after all, by definition, have some inking of what the truth is, and in this case, I regret to say that assumption is far from either absolute or final.
 
Mojo said:
Kumar, you are lying. Nobody has demanded that anything should be "A&F". That's why, despite your "very good rémberance", you are completely unable to link to posts where they have.
Click to expand...
You should remember. I already gave clues. If quotes are needed, we can never proceed but shall always move in circle. If you still want, search in all our interactions. But it is A&F that you demanded A&F type evidences.
 
bruto said:
It takes a very peculiar brand of - I'm not even sure whether words like enormous hubris and cognitive dissonance come close enough - of whatever you can call it to suggest that those of us who have hammered away for post after post in thread after thread saying there is no such thing as "A&F" and that the suggestion that anything be "A&F" is ignorant ill-educated baloney, have in any "indirect way" called for the very thing we condemn, berate and call utter nonsense.

Of course one must reckon with the ability of some posters to assert that black is white and true is false, so to call a person simply a liar might be too charitable an assessment of the problem. A liar does, after all, by definition, have some inking of what the truth is, and in this case, I regret to say that assumption is far from either absolute or final.
Click to expand...

You do not know, how much they harshed me by rejecting all the evidences by this and that excuse. Indirectly they took benefit of doubt due to non A&F nature of evidences of other side inspite of anticipating science is neither A&F nor it can ever be. Even on Jainism, they are behaving similarily inspite of fact that many links and justification, may be of some non A&F nature, are provided. It is irrational egoistic scepticism and odd preception. Selfish Interests, I can not say.
 
Kumar said:
You should remember. I already gave clues. If quotes are needed, we can never proceed but shall always move in circle. If you still want, search in all our interactions. But it is A&F that you demanded A&F type evidences.
Click to expand...

Because you were lying.
I don't think lying is a virtue in Jainism
 
Kumar said:
You should remember. I already gave clues. If quotes are needed, we can never proceed but shall always move in circle.
Click to expand...


Providing evidence for your claims is not "moving in circles". You're just trying to make excuses for your inability to back up your false accusations.

If you still want, search in all our interactions.
Click to expand...


I have read them. Nobody, apart from you, has demanded "A&F type evidences".

But it is A&F that you demanded A&F type evidences.
Click to expand...


No, it isn't: it is a lie. The only person here who even thinks that "A&F" is possible is you.

That fact that people have pointed out that what you claim is evidence is at best very poor evidence, and often not evidence for the proposition you are arguing for, does not mean that they are demanding "A&F" evidence. Just good evidence.
 
Last edited:
Kumar said:
You do not know, how much they harshed me by rejecting all the evidences by this and that excuse. Indirectly they took benefit of doubt due to non A&F nature of evidences of other side inspite of anticipating science is neither A&F nor it can ever be. Even on Jainism, they are behaving similarily inspite of fact that many links and justification, may be of some non A&F nature, are provided. It is irrational egoistic scepticism and odd preception. Selfish Interests, I can not say.
Click to expand...

Only dogs can hear the melody emanating from the world's smallest violin, yet it played all the same
 
Mojo said:
Providing evidence for your claims is not "moving in circles". You're just trying to make excuses for your inability to back up your false accusations.
Depending on odd precption and irrational skepticism, one can be odd but do not consider himself accordingly. Mine demand for A&F evidences is always rejected but always demanded A&F from me. There are only two category, A&F or non A&F. More or less do not matter.



I have read them. Nobody, apart from you, has demanded "A&F type evidences".




No, it isn't: it is a lie. The only person here who even thinks that "A&F" is possible is you.

That fact that people have pointed out that what you claim is evidence is at best very poor evidence, and often not evidence for the proposition you are arguing for, does not mean that they are demanding "A&F" evidence. Just good evidence.
Click to expand...

As above.
Click to expand...
 
Kumar said:
As above.
Click to expand...

I've formed the hypothesis that you toss a certain number of phrases & indistinct terms into a randomly-directed word processor; you post the same garbled things in slightly different phrasings over and over and over.
 
Kumar said:
You do not know, how much they harshed me by rejecting all the evidences by this and that excuse. Indirectly they took benefit of doubt due to non A&F nature of evidences of other side inspite of anticipating science is neither A&F nor it can ever be. Even on Jainism, they are behaving similarily inspite of fact that many links and justification, may be of some non A&F nature, are provided. It is irrational egoistic scepticism and odd preception. Selfish Interests, I can not say.
Click to expand...

Who are "they?" You claim that everyone here has demanded of you some kind of "A&F" because they don't accept your nonsense as true?

If you say in inch is a mile, it does not require an absolute to tell you you're wrong.
 
bruto said:
Who are "they?" You claim that everyone here has demanded of you some kind of "A&F" because they don't accept your nonsense as true?

If you say in inch is a mile, it does not require an absolute to tell you you're wrong.
Click to expand...
No, those demands were A&F type demands. When you can not achieve destination and lose all hopes to achieve it, one inch or one mile behind, do not matter.
 
Mojo said:
Link to posts where this has been done, or withdraw your accusation.
Click to expand...

Either way, not practical. You should remember and accept it. Otherwise I shall anticipate, you are intentionally avoiding.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom