Badlyshavedmonkey equation is dissproved!

You mean a bit like saying "please keep in mind that for my assistant it is very easy to use my log in identity to send posts at JREF forum under my real name Dr. MAS and for you to recognize my dummy posts is very difficult if he does not write his real name but if this happens then this would be a great fraud and my inner conscious does not permit me to adopt this technique where my assistant is sending posts under my name and people are not aware of this fact that they are discussing not with me but with my camouflage assistant in the form of disguise Dr. MAS"?
 
Mojo said:
You mean a bit like saying "please keep in mind that for my assistant it is very easy to use my log in identity to send posts at JREF forum under my real name Dr. MAS and for you to recognize my dummy posts is very difficult if he does not write his real name but if this happens then this would be a great fraud and my inner conscious does not permit me to adopt this technique where my assistant is sending posts under my name and people are not aware of this fact that they are discussing not with me but with my camouflage assistant in the form of disguise Dr. MAS"?
Click to expand...

eh......My linguistic centre just shut down....
*Squints at mojos post*
You are evil....
Ok, I think I got it...
Yeah. Something like that. Only in much simpler language......And Dr. MAS would be wise NOT to send out email/forum posts in a public arena and change his password every week like the rest of us security freaks...

Again: Url from mojos original post removed due to rights issues...
 
"Dr. Sheikh has succeeded in totally derailing this and other threads here.

Sheikh, I don't give a damn about your signature (it just demonstrates what a fool you are, anyway), and I don't give a damn about what you feel about Rolfe's signature, if you don't like it, sue her.

Now, how about addressing the real subjects here? You were going on about how high-potency remedies had active substance in them....

Hans
 
The_Fire said:
?!
Did you by any chance notice my signup date?!
Now answer the effing questions!
Click to expand...

you have given your clarification. I do accept.

But your logic is wrong. There might be lot of members who have registered with duplicate alias and not posting at the moment, they wait for suitable time to appear.
 
Dr. A Sheikh said:
you have given your clarification. I do accept.

But your logic is wrong. There might be lot of members who have registered with duplicate alias and not posting at the moment, they wait for suitable time to appear.
Click to expand...


If you suspect someone is using a sock-puppet then report them to the administrators; include the reasons for your suspicion.
 
Sheikh sahib is not me. He is famous homeopath of Pakistan. He is also using his real name at net. If you have anyother point to discuss then come in front. Otherwise don't waste our time.

Question: What we have to prove? Justify your demand with evidence?
 
Dr. MAS said:
Question: What we have to prove?
Click to expand...
For the JREF challenge, you have to prove that there is a difference between a homoeopathic preparation of over, say, 13c and the stock solvent used in its preparation. You would need to agree an actual test protocol with them, not with people posting on their forum. You have already been provided with contact details and links to information about the challenge.

Of course, this would not actually prove that homoeopathy works, so it would also be nice if you could prove via properly controlled and blinded tests that homoeopathic treatment produces better results than a placebo treatment.
 
Last edited:
Well I hope Sheikh doesn't have any problem with the quote from him I use in my signature ;)
 
Dr. MAS said:
Otherwise don't waste our time.
Click to expand...
Strange, my equipment is going haywire.

:i: :bs:

Question: What we have to prove? Justify your demand with evidence?
Click to expand...
What Mojo said.

Though why you want to prove anything when you've already won the million is confusing me - you have won the JREF million dollars, right MAS?

Cos if you haven't, there's a lie about you springing up on the internet, which I'd respond to if I were you.
 
Dr. MAS said:
Anything left that is yet to proove?
Click to expand...
Now that you have given up trying to prove that Avogadro's limit does not hold for homoeopathy, you could try proving that there is a difference between a homoeopathic preparation above 12C and the corresponding stock solvent.
 
Mojo said:
For the JREF challenge, you have to prove that there is a difference between a homoeopathic preparation of over, say, 13c and the stock solvent used in its preparation. You would need to agree an actual test protocol with them, not with people posting on their forum. You have already been provided with contact details and links to information about the challenge.

Of course, this would not actually prove that homoeopathy works, so it would also be nice if you could prove via properly controlled and blinded tests that homoeopathic treatment produces better results than a placebo treatment.
Click to expand...

We will only prove that thing which we claim. ;)

we do not claim what you have written in your post.

We claim homeopathic potencies available in the market for treatment purpose have starting material otherthan the solvent. Avogadros law is not applicable in the right way as you are applying on the potencies which are available in the shops for sale.
 
Dr. MAS said:
Originally Posted by Mojo:
For the JREF challenge, you have to prove that there is a difference between a homoeopathic preparation of over, say, 13c and the stock solvent used in its preparation. You would need to agree an actual test protocol with them, not with people posting on their forum. You have already been provided with contact details and links to information about the challenge.

Of course, this would not actually prove that homoeopathy works, so it would also be nice if you could prove via properly controlled and blinded tests that homoeopathic treatment produces better results than a placebo treatment.
Click to expand...
We will only prove that thing which we claim. ;)

we do not claim what you have written in your post.
Click to expand...
So you are now stating that you do not claim either that there is a difference between a high potency (i.e. over 13c) homoeopathic preparation and the solvent used to prepare it, or that homoeopathy works. Those are the two claims that I suggested you prove in the post you quoted.

What are you trying to prove?
 
Dr. MAS said:
We claim homeopathic potencies available in the market for treatment purpose have starting material otherthan the solvent. Avogadros law is not applicable in the right way as you are applying on the potencies which are available in the shops for sale.
Click to expand...
It appears from this that you are merely claiming that there are homoeopathic products on the market that are incompetently prepared. This may well be true, but it doesn't help your case. If anything, it makes you look even more of a quack than you did already.
 
Dr. MAS said:
We will only prove that thing which we claim. ;)

we do not claim what you have written in your post.

We claim homeopathic potencies available in the market for treatment purpose have starting material otherthan the solvent. Avogadros law is not applicable in the right way as you are applying on the potencies which are available in the shops for sale.
Click to expand...
I'm sure you are right. There will be lots of stuff in them, as there is not likely to be a single homeopathic pharmacy in the world capable of producing an unadulterated 12C remedy (in fact I doubt there is such a lab at all).

Now, since we got that aside, are you claiming that the effect of homeopathic remedies rests on the random contaminations that will exist in all of them?

Hans
 
Dr. MAS said:
Sheikh sahib is not me. He is famous homeopath of Pakistan. He is also using his real name at net. If you have anyother point to discuss then come in front. Otherwise don't waste our time.

Question: What we have to prove? Justify your demand with evidence?
Click to expand...

Famous? Are you sure?

A quick google suggests otherwise. All the hits either point to this forum or the nch forum. Me thinks you are trolling yet again.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom