• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

August Stundie nominations

Most of Patrick1000's posts are far too wordy to make good Stundie noms, but this one works well:


Patrick1000 said:
A final point before I conclude for the day. There is the famous visor down photograph of Armstrong "walking across the surface of the moon". We are all very familiar with this image. This cannot be an authentic moonscape shot. They would not allow Armstrong to do this and of course Armstrong would not do such a fool hardy thing in the context of genuine potential for exposure to laser light of that intensity. There must not be any authentic risk of exposure to ruby red light in the "context" of this famous photo, and so one may conclude Neil Armstrong is not on the surface of the moon on July 20 1969. Pat
Click to expand...


...particularly when you consider how he completely ignored my earlier post.

In fact, this would make a great comic.....
 
It's not related to a conspiracy, but I thought the highlighted phrase might be enjoyed by Stundie readers.
EzikeltheProphet said:
I will only address people with sense an respect.

You seem cool.
Yes it is true, people see stuff in the sky they cannot identify all the time but not when it comes to me. I have recorded the skies for years and i am ex-military . Working with the Air-force and Being stationed near Air bases helped and adds to my experience identifying ANYTHING in the sky.
You are incorrect about invisible UFO being unproven. I can sense when they are there and i can record them with the help of Infrared devices. UFO have multi-spectrum cloaking technology and there have been times when i was able to get them to display their cloaking to me.

To establish that UFO are there because i summoned them is easy.
The sky wont have any UFO visible before i summon but within seconds to a couple of minutes after my summons the sky will have objects that glow like a star but is not , flying above us. Now if the JREF wants to claim they are NOT what i say they are then they must prove it, because they will not appear before i summon. I proved my ability. Any claim to a hypothesized identity by either the tester or the JREF must be proven with data... if they say airplane- show me the wings and FAA safety lights...... if they say satellite then show me the data backing up that claim (SHOULD BE EASY SINCE ALL SAT. DATA IS ON THE WEB)
However, till this day I AM UNDEBUNKABLE . Not a soul on this planet can debunk my sightings.... just make guesses and theories.
For the 1st test i suggest the location be in NYC (anywhere in NYC) where i live and that it be a clear night that stars are visible. Anyone may attend and the location can be kept secret from me. I have FAITH in God and believe I cannot fail .


Its only mundane to the mundane.:cool:
Click to expand...
 
Sounds like a new super hero.

Look, up in the sky. It's a bird! It's a plane! No, it's Captain Undebunkable!!!!!!
 
carlitos said:
It's not related to a conspiracy, but I thought the highlighted phrase might be enjoyed by Stundie readers.
Click to expand...

Okay, so let me see if I got this straight...he can make objects appear "that glow like a star, but is not", but will only demonstrate this power on "a clear night that stars are visible"...
 
He clearly has a different idea of what "debunkable" means.
 
Horatius said:
In fact, this would make a great comic.....
Click to expand...



full.png
 
Here's tmd2_1 commenting on the "flash" seen on some videos of the WTC crashes, and suggesting that it must have an unusual explanation.

tmd2_1 said:
There's been millions of commercial flights in history right? As far as I could find these were the only two that exhibited anything like that.
Click to expand...

Because, of all the millions of commercial airliners that were filmed crashing into high-rise buildings, only these two gave flashes.

Dave
 
There must be thousands of high-resolution films of large jetliners crashing into huge skyscrapers at high speed. I want to know why only the two on 9-11 had those flashes!!!!!111!!1!
 
Last edited:
Dave Rogers said:
Here's tmd2_1 commenting on the "flash" seen on some videos of the WTC crashes, and suggesting that it must have an unusual explanation.



Because, of all the millions of commercial airliners that were filmed crashing into high-rise buildings, only these two gave flashes.

Dave
Click to expand...

Of course,,, why didn't I think of that?
,,, and by 'that' I mean nominating tmd's quote for a Stundie:D
 
Because I am jealous that Dave niminated tmd for the above quote,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

Here's tmd again;
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=7504547&postcount=502

Ah I have found something I think demonstrates the concept of what could (I emphasize could have been used). Missile fires 3 sub missiles are fired from that missile. Full description here. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Starstreak_(missile)

Please do not bombard me with questions, about how this weapon could not have been used. I am not saying it was...only that the concept would be similar, right down to the self detonation of the sub missiles. Which is something I'm sure the conspirators would have made sure happened. Technology was developed in the 80's way in advance of 2001.
Click to expand...

Is this a Yosemite Sam "I don't know how they done it but I knows they done it arguement?

Somewhat circular reasoning. Its a missile that explodes on impact and that proves that 911 was an inside job. I know it because the perpetrators would have made sure to use such a weapon and therefore such a weapon would have been employed and therefore 911 was an inside job.
 
Last edited:
From here...

UNHOLY SPIRITS
Occultism and New Age Humanism
Dr. Gary North​

Here is a simple, straightforward idea which has implications you probably never dreamed of. There are unexplained events in this world: UFOs, telepathy, demonic healing, accurate predictions of future happenings. These events really happen, and fm men can simply push them aside by attributing their origin to the random events in a change-created world. Science has tried to hide them for centuries, but these and other "irrational happenings are creeping out of the closet to challenge the sacred cows of rationalism. There may be future "logical" explanations, but the best one is probably the simplest: evil, supernatural, and highly personal powers are hard at work in today's world.

UNHOLY SPIRITS demonstrates beyond a shadow of a doubt the active existence of demonic forces in our rational, humanistic 20th century. What is even more unnerving, however, is Dr. Gary North's argument that the fundamentals of humanism are identical to the basics of Satanism. This is not to say that all humanists are demonists. But it does mean that a commitment to the philosophy of humanism is no longer a shield against the demonic. It does not prevent men from dabbling in the occult or even embracing it, nor does it prevent a radical new class of scientists from opening up a Pandora's box of satanic experimentation which could change the way you live. As C.S. Lewis' demon, Screwtape, wrote to his nephew Wormwood in The Screwtape Letters, when the materialists believe in demons but not in God, the battle is over.
Click to expand...

By the way, the link is from an anti-D&D pamphlet that is still distributed among some fundamentalist Christians today.
 
jaydeehess said:
Because I am jealous that Dave niminated tmd for the above quote,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

Here's tmd again;
Which is something I'm sure the conspirators would have made sure happened. Technology was developed in the 80's way in advance of 2001.

Is this a Yosemite Sam "I don't know how they done it but I knows they done it arguement?

Somewhat circular reasoning. Its a missile that explodes on impact and that proves that 911 was an inside job. I know it because the perpetrators would have made sure to use such a weapon and therefore such a weapon would have been employed and therefore 911 was an inside job.
Click to expand...

Hey, give him credit - he got one thing right: the 1980s were way in advance of 2001.
 
Patrick1000 seems to have stayed out of the running so far by never saying anything comprehensible. On the rare occasions when he does, we can see why he'd rather not.

Patrick1000 said:
Since the astronauts were not on the moon, they feared lasers. Not necessarily just "our own" ruby red laser at Lick Observatory, but any laser. You see, others could not take a picture of the landing site to prove or disporve the landing's authenticity, but they could shine light from the earth, and just like the argon laser filmed/photographed in 1968 by surveyor VII, it would be anticipated for a laser image to appear in astronaut filmings/photos, if they were shots that included the earth at a time when anybody's laser was fired.

This by the way is why Alan Bean purposely breaks the tv camera during the Apollo 12 mission. Because everyone including the Russians and French know those guys are supposed to be at the Surveyor 3 site. It can easily be targeted. If the Russians or French or whomever shoot a laser of any type, one at least as bright and visible as the 1968 Surveyor VII filmed argon laser, then the light should appear in video, photos of the earth.
Click to expand...

They weren't worried about the Soviets being able to figure out they weren't on the moon by tracking radio signals and finding out there weren't any, but one single laser could have blown apart the whole conspiracy.

Lasers... is there anything they can't do?

Dave
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom