• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

August Stundie Nominations

dafydd said:
I stand corrected.
Click to expand...

Let's not forget good old Spooked911. he was a classic back in the day... Remember the flaming bunny cage? The tower of paper towel roles??

Travis said:
Why do the kooks just seem to love ascribing all sorts of great weapons to Tesla? It's almost lazy at this point.
Click to expand...

and they weren't even that good a metal band either.
 
Last edited:
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?postid=6236368#post6236368

Note that no firemen say outright that there were actual explosives . They say everything BUT that however . The reason for this is that they had all seen the plane crashing into the building and thereby had every reason to assume that to be the cause of the collapse. Therefore they are relectant to make positive atatements of explosives in the Towers . If there had not been any planes I think the firemen would have had no hesitation in making straight-out statements that the building had been explosively demolished.''
Click to expand...
 
I nominate icedragonknight12345 from you tube for the quote "eveyday ordinary roll of toilet paper, very good representation of one of the twin towers"
 
Davidg64 said:
I nominate icedragonknight12345 from you tube for the quote "eveyday ordinary roll of toilet paper, very good representation of one of the twin towers"
Click to expand...



You'll need a link. Leave off the www part, and we can fix it for you.
 
Davidg64 said:
Link. You tube physics at it's best. (not enough posts to post a link here yet)

youtube.com/watch?v=h0o_86aheFU
Click to expand...

Wow, I debated with the common sense guy 3 years ago. I think "Net force=0" guy is also his prodigy. Good times.
 
I forget what the rules are to nominating a Stundie, so I'm not sure if this counts because it's basically already won an award as a prize video at failblog.org but I can't help but think this embodies everything that is Stundie. I therefore nominate: Rainbows? How the **** do they work?


 
New poster ergo is putting up a strong showing in the increasingly dull 9/11 sub-forum.

ergo said:
Please explain how Conservation of Mass applies to rubble crushing through an intact building.
Click to expand...

Because, although it's universal at non-relativistic speeds for every other phenomenon, we still need to find out whether it's still the case in one specific instance.

Dave
 
Dave Rogers said:
New poster ergo is putting up a strong showing in the increasingly dull 9/11 sub-forum.


Because, although it's universal at non-relativistic speeds for every other phenomenon, we still need to find out whether it's still the case in one specific instance.

Dave
Click to expand...

Oh, man, that is going in the finals.
 
rodin said:
abbadon ire said:
rodin said:
My friend I am very aware Apollo is a very difficult hoax to prove, and that many have tried with cases of varying merit all the way to ludicrously uninformed. However, there are many 'discredited ideas' that turned out to be true.

Such as how WTC happened.

Or going back a bit further, that the Earth rotated around the Sun
Click to expand...


You claimed to have irrefutable proof. Now you say it is difficult to prove.

Which is it?
Click to expand...


both

I think
Click to expand...


Well, I thought it was funny.


Here are the two posts in question:

http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showpost.php?p=1059159945&postcount=426

http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showpost.php?p=1059164227&postcount=429
 
He has irrefutable proof that is is difficult to prove! :D
 
16.5 said:
Oh, man, that is going in the finals.
Click to expand...

Yep. It's a high quality Stundie. I like his post that started the mass issue as well:

ergo said:
Mass does not stay the same when an object is broken into many smaller pieces. The disintegration of any structure completely alters the way it functions, the way it moves, the friction it encounters, its ability to do work.

If you disagree, please tell me what laws of physics support this notion.
Click to expand...


The idea that someone one the internet has been able to type this with a straight face, thinking he has a serious point, thinking he has physics behind him. It hearts the brain. It is funny.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom