• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

August Stundie Nominations

He plans to use windows that let in the wind but keep out that pesky oxygen.
 
I nominate Jammonius (as if he doesn't have enough nominations).
Here he is in peak form, once again using something as evidence that the opposite occured.


jammonius said:
No actual statement of plane crashes.
Here is the source of United's convoluted press release issued close on to Noon on 9/11:

http://web.archive.org/web/20010911...onse/PressReleases/0,11641,-1__1750_1,00.html

Content:

"United Airlines Confirms Incidents Involving Two UA Flight Numbers, Dispatch of Family Assistance Team 11 Sep 2001, 11:53 AM, EST

United Airlines has now confirmed that two of its aircraft have crashed. United Flight 93, a Boeing 757 aircraft, departed from Newark, NJ, at 8:01 a.m. local time, bound for San Francisco, with 38 passengers onboard, 2 pilots and 5 flight attendants. United Flight 175, a Boeing 767 aircraft, departed from Boston at 7:58 a.m. local time, bound for Los Angeles, with 56 passengers onboard, 2 pilots and 7 flight attendants."

<snipped by X>
Click to expand...


highlighting mine.


Right up there with his use of a witness who explicitly states they saw the aircraft crash as a no-plane witness, and with his use of a technical drawing showing the columns to be hollow as evidence that the columns were solid.

Jammonius plainly lives in opposite-land.
 
Yet another jammy gem:

jammonius said:
I wonder if you realize you have yet to post a source for any claim you are making about the matter of adequate simulation??

Excaza, you have not refuted anything because you have not provided a source, link or other form of confirmation of the claim you are making.

I am going to stick with this as long as necessary.

Either you are going to source your claim or you are going to be reminded that you have not refuted a darn thing for as long as it takes for you to source and therefore prove your objection that it is inaccurate to use a 747 simulator for a 767 flight.

The video claims it is valid to do so. That is an adequate source.

Once again, Excaza, you have yet to source your claim of objection.
Click to expand...

Not only does he claim that a 747 simulator is adequate to simulate a 767, he claims that the youtube video says it's true and the video itself is an adequate source for that info.
 
jammonius said:
You are not up to speed on this, EH. The issue of aircraft model is not the essential point. The essential point is whether a 747 simulator is an adequate vehicle for simulating the conditions presented in the data depicting the last 4min40sec of alleged Flight 175, based on the input into the simulator of that data.
Click to expand...
Flight 175 was a Boeing ... 767.

ETA - oops. EventHorizon's is better.
 
Guys, if we're going to include every Stundie worthy quote from jammy, there'll be no room for anyone else.
 
The answer, my friends, was blowing in the wind..:
How ? My speculation is that the USA military using "Magnetic Disruption", a classified ultra secret weapon system originally developed by Nicola Tesla, was used to cause every atom of the steel structure to separate from every other atom. Thus the entire structure just dropped down the way it did. Those free atoms then went blowing in the wind reacting with oxygen along the way. Creating the immense heat in the process. Only this can explain the observed events of 9/11/2001.
Click to expand...
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/single/9410529.html
 
if such a creature was still around,would'nt it have to surface ocassionally for air?
and just like other predators like cougars,lions,tigers,bear and sharks,find people as easy lunch should they wish to eat them?
Click to expand...

From another forum I'm a member of, in a thread that put up whether or not Megalodon survived to modern day to a poll.

Not as inane as some of these, but brain stopping to a point.
 
My speculation is that the USA military using "Magnetic Disruption", a classified ultra secret weapon system originally developed by Nicola Tesla
Click to expand...

Why do the kooks just seem to love ascribing all sorts of great weapons to Tesla? It's almost lazy at this point.
 
9/11 Investigator shows us his military skills with this bizarre analogy.

9/11-investigator said:
Again the example I used earlier. Weaker woman in parking garage is approached in straight by big silent man of undefined color. He probably wants to rob her. As soon as he has her wrists in his grip she has lost. She has one means of defense, that is strike first by grabbing the pepper spray from her purse and use it (preventive war) before he can grab her wrists. Fine 'choice' she has!

Perfect analogy of the German-Russia/France/Britain situation in 1914, the German-Britain/France situation in 1940, the German-Russian situation in 1941.
Click to expand...
 
From the Peiran Spring of nonsense, the Icke forums-

Context: http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=129547&highlight=stephen+hawking

Dr. Hawking says humanity has a place in space- forumite resonds with "well, no duh!"

In a clusterbomb of stundification, this is maybe my favorite:

" Originally Posted by angelthecat View Post

how can you be sure that steven hawking is saying it? it is possible that the information attributed to him has another source, I seriously believe that the talking chair is a two way radio and anything he is asked is answered by someone else [hence a monotone robotic voice], also most books are written by ghost writers I dont see his as any different and it is the same agenda as rothchilde funded sitchin, realise how easy it is to push an agenda through an innocent victim who cannot defend himself either verbally or physically"

you just might be right about this, i think thats likely."
__________________
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom