Atheists destroy churches, attack the faithful

Another slandering thread rears its ugly head.

"Republican Christians in America put children in cages, stage executions (I know!) and support torture. Christianity is totally, entirely to blame. Nya, nya."
 
Last edited:
Another slandering thread rears its ugly head.

"Republican Christians in America put children in cages and support torture. Christianity is totally, entirely to blame. Nya, nya."

"slandering"... Hoo boy

"Marxist Atheists put Muslims in cages and demand that they denounce their religion."

And you suggest that suggesting that Atheism had something to do with it is 'slander"?

Or "hate speech" like another poster did earlier?

Yeah, this guy is going to disagree, and go ahead and strongly hope that atheists stop making themselves out to be the aggrieved parties here?

Just a bit?
 
I think you guys are being a bit too hard on TBD. The way he takes Faux Internet Outrage and elevates it to a form of art is truly fascinating. And he manages to do so not just in this thread, but all over the forum, with surgical precision.

I think he deserves some credit for that.
 
Quick to judge, aren't we?
Seems to be more and more his MO.


I'm not endorsing China's repressions - but I can see the rationale from the POV of the Leadership.
The brutal re-education of the masses of the Muslim minority is most likely the biggest (by scale) human rights violation in decades.
It is also what is keeping Radical Islamism from gaining a foothold in China.
I wonder if that will help more or hurt more compared to many western countries which accept Muslim immigrants with no restrictions on religious practice.
 
TBD, if you're going to start chasing around grammar mistakes like a priest in a kiddie pool that's really going to clog up the thread.

The goal is reaching post #500. Then (or "than"?;)) all TBD threads come to an end. It doesn't happen when everybody starts to beat a dead horse, but when the dead horse starts to stink and the sticks get covered with some kind of pestilent gunk.
 
No,

Think of it like a Venn diagram.

The subset of the people responsible for this atrocity all fall directly within the set of "atheist."

Sure, like the subset formed by the Son of Sam and his looking alike colleagues fall directly within the set of "white people". We got if from the very OP, why do you insist repeating it?
 
Oh my, you do love your rice analogy.

Say, maybe if instead of Firm Marxist Atheists persecuting religious people, instead we have Firm Marxist Rice marketing board persecuting people who didn't eat rice, and then TBD would come in and explain it is because of the fact they market rice, and then pro-rice snowflakes would come in and say, no, it has nothing to do with rice, it is because dictatorship.

"Rice, it is what Marxist Atheists eat when persecuting religious people."

I have always been in favor of rice snowflakes. This much is true.
 
Didn't Australia do the same thing after they elected an atheist? I'm pretty sure they burned all the churches or filled them with spiders or something.
 
Didn't Australia do the same thing after they elected an atheist? I'm pretty sure they burned all the churches or filled them with spiders or something.


Ah yes those were some interesting times. The god botherers garrisoned themselves in the churches and armed themselves to the teeth. Nothing happened however and it was business as usual for all religious creeds.

It would be Bob Hawk you are referring to I assume, although there have been many atheists elected to parliament in Australia. The parliament in turn then elects the Prime Minister.
 
Didn't Australia do the same thing after they elected an atheist? I'm pretty sure they burned all the churches or filled them with spiders or something.
Were they atheist spiders? Because that's what really matters here. And they have big spiders, so it wouldn't take many to discourage the faithful from entering the building....
 
Didn't Australia do the same thing after they elected an atheist? I'm pretty sure they burned all the churches or filled them with spiders or something.
No, we didn't.

We filled the churches with spiders first. Then we burned the spiders. It was great.

Honestly, this is just another TBD piss-take. His argument tripped over right at the front doormat and he has been trying to drag it down the street from then on.
 
No, we didn't.

We filled the churches with spiders first. Then we burned the spiders. It was great.

Honestly, this is just another TBD piss-take. His argument tripped over right at the front doormat and he has been trying to drag it down the street from then on.

Wait you mean pointing out that marxist atheists were surpressing religious people was unfair, slander, hate speech, tripped right out of the box.... which then would have been a post declaring that my opening post was more appalling than putting a million people in detention.

Huh
 
Wait you mean pointing out that marxist atheists were surpressing religious people was unfair, slander, hate speech, tripped right out of the box.... which then would have been a post declaring that my opening post was more appalling than putting a million people in detention.

Huh

See what I mean? Innerwebz High Art Faux Rage.

Kudos, TBD. You are truly a master at work.
 
See what I mean? Innerwebz High Art Faux Rage.

Kudos, TBD. You are truly a master at work.

Say, I have been remiss in not welcoming you to the site! So welcome!

Now, just as a bit of a protip? A post that is dripping sarcasm about hyperbolic overreactions from your side and ends up with the word "Huh" should not in any sense of the word be declared:

Rage
 
Wait you mean pointing out that marxist atheists were surpressing religious people was unfair, slander, hate speech, tripped right out of the box.... which then would have been a post declaring that my opening post was more appalling than putting a million people in detention.

Huh
Look, now it fell again, this time in the gutter and got all dirty. And still he's trying to drag it along to the town hall for display.
 

Back
Top Bottom