Atheism Plus/Free Thought Blogs (FTB)

Status
Not open for further replies.
I just gave you some examples of my non-conforming opinions. So am I lying, or would you like to clarify?

What "dissenting views" do you think are not allowed there? Be specific.

.

Well, for example, as you asked, the details/facts of the extent and nature of Ms Watson's original allegations about the "atheist community" are apparently not open to discussion.
Question them, ask for clarification, even politely and dispassionately , you get banned.

http://atheismplus.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=415

-
 
Last edited:
Are you saying this thread was without snark and condescension and putdowns?

I had to read how A+ was a bunch of Eighth Grade girls. And that they were inherently stupid and also evil.

It's not a snark-free zone. Wait, are you being sarcastic? I'll feel silly if you were just being sarcastic.



Oh, there's plenty of deserved (you know how to pronounce that right?) snark and putdowns. Links are posted and analysed logically.

Condescension? Maybe. Please point it out with a link.

Evil? Stupid? Eighth grade girls? Matter of opinion. And opinions are common.

My opinion is that A+ is nothing more than a bunch of over-zealous, invested and confused no-all, no-nothings masquerading as saviours of people who have no need or desire to be saved. Opinion is funny like that.

I note that you only quoted and replied to a part of my post.

And by the way, what is your position? Sorry but it's a bit hard to work out from this post.
 
Many years ago, a male student, was charged with staring at girls. When it came his time to defend his actions he stated the following, that he had the right to “life liberty and the pursuit of happiness” (I hear that is written down somewhere) and watching females was his happiness. The charges were dropped.


Aren't we all, maybe not, glad that our parents somehow got together.



Paul



:) :) :)


Heaven forbid, in an elevator.
 
Last edited:
First you say that a person shouldn't imply that JREF contains snark and putdowns, then on the same page you say there's plenty. That's all I was pointing out.

I note that you only quoted and replied to a part of my post.

I didn't reply to your suggestion that everyone's rude over there and somehow not here, or that you ascribe a motivation to A+ of wanting to speak for all atheism. I thought I kind of covered those before. I don't know what you'd want me to add.

And by the way, what is your position? Sorry but it's a bit hard to work out from this post.

If you just copy-and-paste this into multiple discussions, it's hard to work out if it's an honest question.
 
Many years ago, a male student, was charged with staring at girls. When it came his time to defend his actions he stated the following, that he had the right to “life liberty and the pursuit of happiness” (I hear that is written down somewhere) and watching females was his happiness. The charges were dropped.


Aren't we all, maybe not, glad that our parents somehow got together.



Paul



:) :) :)


Heaven forbid, in an elevator.

Coffee?
 
The thread exists. Find some evidence.

You're going to condescend to me, then ask me to provide evidence that the thread contains any condescension anywhere in it?

This is not a serious argument.

I don't know what you seek to prove.
 
The coffee and elevator jokes go a long way toward proving that the skeptical community doesn't contain people insensitive to sexism.
 
You're going to condescend to me, then ask me to provide evidence that the thread contains any condescension anywhere in it?

This is not a serious argument.

I don't know what you seek to prove.


I'm sorry. Really. I guess you didn't get the irony of that part of my post.

When you're ready to reply to the rest of the bits of my posts feel free.
 
Re: Atheism Plus

First you say that a person shouldn't imply that JREF contains snark and putdowns, then on the same page you say there's plenty. That's all I was pointing out.

I can insult public figures or ideologies all I want to here. But what can't do with out some reprimand is insult you. The idea is to not attack the arguer. But nothing stops me from declairing un flattering opinions I hold of a group.
 
I can insult public figures or ideologies all I want to here. But what can't do with out some reprimand is insult you. The idea is to not attack the arguer. But nothing stops me from declairing un flattering opinions I hold of a group.

Of course you can insult public figures or ideologies. Insult away.

I was pointing out that you asserted two arguments that contradicted.

Nothing stops you from doing this, but it makes your overall argument less convincing.
 
How gracious. I think I have already posted on the other parts of your posts, as I've posted. You must have missed them.


I made a number of points to which you have failed to respond.

It's all in pixels for the lurkers.

I'm happy to discuss the issues that you have raised and that I have responded to.
 
The coffee and elevator jokes go a long way toward proving that the skeptical community doesn't contain people insensitive to sexism.


A man asking a woman for coffee in an elevator is not sexism.



Paul



:) :) :)
 
I made a number of points to which you have failed to respond.

It's all in pixels for the lurkers.

I'm happy to discuss the issues that you have raised and that I have responded to.

What are you talking about?

I didn't reply to your suggestion that everyone's rude over there and somehow not here, or that you ascribe a motivation to A+ of wanting to speak for all atheism. I thought I kind of covered those before. I don't know what you'd want me to add.

If you just copy-and-paste this into multiple discussions, it's hard to work out if it's an honest question.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom