Assistance required for telepathy proof

I genuinely think, next time you see your doctor, you enquire about Narcissus Complex - testing for this maybe the only objective testing you need.
 
Narcissism and understanding reality are not the same thing. I was asked for an example and I gave one - queue scorn and derision.

Objective testing will prove me to be correct.

golfy
 
golfy said:
And where will putting my understanding of what is going on get me on a forum, more criticism from game players against someone who cannot prove his ability as yet.

As for the sport thing, I have many examples but here is one for you to now deride and ask me to prove when I can't as it happened a long time ago. It is a fact non the less.

I caused the only multiple false start in F1 in 1999 at the Nurburgring

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e4W17xMVErw

You will see Eddie Jordan who owned Jordan F1 (the yellow car) looking into the camera with a glare of derision. This is Eddie telling me off for causing the false start by shouting "Go!" before the lights went out. I was in Ipswich, England watching it live.

People can hear a lot about me, when I talk, when I think etc. If I hear it then they do. I could write hundreds of examples but what good will that do – you will never accept that as reality unless I can back it up with objective evidence.

I asked a girl in a night club for a dance and she looked at me and said "Yes." and then said “You’re the guy with the guitar in your head, aren't you.” I get called freak by complete strangers etc etc. A hundred examples will not change your opinion, objective proof will.

What they hear in their heads is not necessarily the same as what a schizophrenic hears in his/hers. You are not comparing apples with apples, Pioxel42.
Click to expand...


Anyone still think that test results of any kind are going to convince golfy he's not telepathic?
 
Narcissism and understanding reality are not the same thing
Click to expand...

That's the first true thing you have said - the reality is that you do not have a super power. You are now claiming you affected an F1 race! Can you not see how ludicrous that is?

Seriously, golfy, this sounds like it has gone beyond mere delusion. I hope your doctors can help you because I predict a road to disappointment, frustration and further psychological issues when you fail to demonstrate any paranormal ability whatsoever.
 
golfy said:
Objective testing will prove me to be correct.

golfy
Click to expand...

How could it possibly prove anything when we already know that everyone will lie about the results. Perhaps the testing will prove something to you, but you already know the answer (and so does everyone else, but they will continue to lie), so what's the point?

Ward
 
The point is that lying so that your opinion is accepted rather than the truth is not the same thing as denying actual scientific evidence from a credible source.

Evidence that speaks for itself is different to a verbal denial.

golfy
 
So why won't everyone just lie and say the evidence isn't there? If everyone is already denying they can hear your thoughts, why are they going to tell the truth when you show them the blinky lights on your magic box?
 
golfy said:
As for the sport thing, I have many examples but here is one for you to now deride and ask me to prove when I can't as it happened a long time ago. It is a fact non the less.

I caused the only multiple false start in F1 in 1999 at the Nurburgring

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e4W17xMVErw

You will see Eddie Jordan who owned Jordan F1 (the yellow car) looking into the camera with a glare of derision. This is Eddie telling me off for causing the false start by shouting "Go!" before the lights went out. I was in Ipswich, England watching it live.
Click to expand...

Why are you telling us this? We already know all this, we heard it at the time.

In fact, why bother posting at all? We already know what you're going to write, when you think about it.

(You may not be aware that we can all hear your thoughts all the time, whether you want us to or not. We're keeping quiet about that bit as well.)
 
Don't you think it's a bit narcissistic to assume you were the only telepath yelling "Go!"? That race was watched by millions, many of whom were much closer to the Nurburgring than you were.
 
golfy said:
The machine has never produced an incorrect indication in its trials. The inventor describes it as 99% accurate but claims that no mistakes have ever been produced by it in trials with the FBI and other tests and has been in service since 2004. It has released previously convicted criminals by proving them innocent and is admissible in court due to its accuracy.
Click to expand...
If this were true, every government and agency around the world would be using them. Didn't you read the link I gave earlier, giving the results of the Office of Technology Assessment’s (OTA) review and assessment of the scientific evidence on the validity of polygraph testing?
 
Beaver Hateman said:
Why are you telling us this? We already know all this, we heard it at the time.

In fact, why bother posting at all? We already know what you're going to write, when you think about it.

(You may not be aware that we can all hear your thoughts all the time, whether you want us to or not. We're keeping quiet about that bit as well.)
Click to expand...


I did not say that you could only hear me when I think to you. You assumed that (or acted that way - you being the forum) but I am "on" 24/7 and cannot turn my telepathy off. I am quite aware that people can hear every thought I have - I have been aware of my ability for a long time, why would I not have known that by now?

If you already know that then why ask questions.

I assume you may have tried to look sarcastic but the statement is factual.

To Pixel42 - why would you not be surprised - if a normal guy walks down the street, what would be the resson for calling him freak?

golfy
 
Last edited:
Is there really any point in trying to have a rational discussion with someone who has admittedly been diagnosed as schizophrenic? :confused:
 
golfy said:
I did not say that you could only hear me when I think to you. You assumed that (or acted that way - you being the forum) but I am "on" 24/7 and cannot turn my telepathy off. I am quite aware that people can hear every thought I have - I have been aware of my ability for a long time, why would I not have known that by now?
Click to expand...

If everyone hears your thoughts all the time, they all know everything about you and your 'telepathy' already. Who are you trying to convince, and why?

I notice you just ignore these questions - why is that?
 
golfy said:
Did you have a look at the link I posted - it is not as polygraph. Get a grip.
Click to expand...

Sorry, my mistake - you've decided to abandon the polygraph (and/or the GSR) and use an EEG to measure the P300, have you?

No, I thought not.
 
dlorde said:
If everyone hears your thoughts all the time, they all know everything about you and your 'telepathy' already. Who are you trying to convince, and why?

I notice you just ignore these questions - why is that?
Click to expand...


Answering endless questions has got me how far forward?

golfy



dlorde said:
Sorry, my mistake - you've decided to abandon the polygraph (and/or the GSR) and use an EEG to measure the P300, have you?

No, I thought not.
Click to expand...


You evidently do not understand the cat ship test as being objective - I can't be bothered to educate you with something that I understand already and it has been covered with Sledge who also quoted out of context poly literature.

You have just demonstrated my above point about your first question. I need to understand how to prove my ability. What you understand is not really relevant as you are not capable of grasping poly objectiveness in a cat ship test in the first place and quote poly literature when I made a statement about a P300 test which is admissible in court and is backed up scientifically.

You are slowing me down with a burden of mental inability to comprehend the basics.

golfy
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom