• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Ask a Muslim anything

Hello Ryan, and welcome to the forum. :)

I think this thread you started is fun and interesting.

I know that many muslims do not eat pork, while others do.

What is the basis for that restriction, and are there other dietary laws in the islamic faith?

Peace caniswalensis,

There are three major dietary restrictions in the Qur'an: Pig flesh, running blood and that which we do not invoke the name of God over. This is in various verses, but the one I reference is 16:115

He has only forbidden you what dies of itself and blood and flesh of swine and that over which any other name than that of Allah has been invoked, but whoever is driven to necessity, not desiring nor exceeding the limit, then surely Allah is Forgiving, Merciful.

Many different sects tend to use hadith to further restrict dietary customs. Some of the various examples would be things like alcohol, donkey, shellfish, dog, horse, goat, etc.
 
Hmmm... my own Koran says thusly:



And the rest of the surah goes on like this:



You may have to bear with this unbeliever too and I think you'll find most of us will be of the impression that this description of a pulsar is a little thin.

Is it now a majority opinion among interpreters of the Koran that this is a description of a pulsar or is it a personal interpretation?

Peace angrysoba,

There are other interpretations that translate it as "The Morning Star" as well as other things. Among other English translations, I am a big fan of Dr. Ghali's work, due to the fact that he recognizes the diverse amount of interpretive room in the Qur'anic language and attempts to bring them together as casually as he can. For example, here is his translation of 86:1

And (by) the heaven and the Night Visitant! (Or: "The Morning Star; literally: The Rapper).

As he points out, the literal translation of "tariq" is "Rapper" or "Knocker"

Hope that helps.
 
Sounds fair. Things were very different 1,500 years ago.

The Bible says that a child who curses his parents shall be put to death, but no one in their right mind argues today that this rule should be enforced.

Yep. The Bible also says that light came before the light source :)
 
Peace AdMan,

As I referenced, the Crab Nebula is an example on how powerful a pulsar is. The pulsar inside the Nebula is around 10 miles in diameter but generating enough light to illuminate around 6 light years of supernova remnants using only it's pulsing lighthouse effect.

Hope that helps. :)

While the Crab Pulsar sends high-energy electrons into the surrounding nebula, the pulsar remains visibly faint, even though it is one of the few "pulsating radio stars" that pulse in full spectrum (including visible light). It's basically an electrical generator -- not glowing itself, but providing energy for a system that glows.

It also pulses at 30 times a second. Can you relate this to "knocking"? Feature films pulse at 24 times a second and the human brain interprets this as flowing motion.

So, we know pulsars are visibly faint and your one example of a bright region surrounding a faint pulsar contains a pulsar spinning far too fast to be described as "knocking".

Given this, do you acknowledge that the Qur'an does not accurately describe a pulsar?
 
Peace AdMan,

As I referenced, the Crab Nebula is an example on how powerful a pulsar is. The pulsar inside the Nebula is around 10 miles in diameter but generating enough light to illuminate around 6 light years of supernova remnants using only it's pulsing lighthouse effect.
No. There is no "pulsing lighthouse effect", and pulsars do not generate light.

What pulsars do is spin. SN 1054 - the pulsar at the center of the Crab Nebula - rotates about 30 times per second. So if you could detect it, which certainly did not happen prior to the 20th century, you'd perceive it as a low hum.

None of this relates at all to the verse you cited; that's just really, really bad confirmation bias.

Edit: Damn, ninja'd.
 
Jinn another question :)

what do you think about same sex marriages?
should they be allowed? well secular marriages of course.
 
Do you believe that as humans had a hand in writing the Koran, that some of it might be just wrong, as a result of human error or fallibility?

Would it be possible for you to reject a portion of the Koran but still consider yourself a Muslim?

My biggest problem with most religions is that typically they hold their book to be infallible. With something so influential I just have a hard time believing that nobody compiling it would have put words into it for their own purposes, or at least be so eager for validation of their personal beliefs that they would "spin" it in their favor.

Peace gnome,

Muslims believe the Qur'an to have come straight from the mouth of Muhammad via divine revelation by the angel Gabriel. Whenever Muhammad was given a revelation, those around him would write down the verses on whatever they had on hand, bones, leaves, fabrics, etc. Muhammad would then reveal the chapter and verse of each one. The Qur'an was revealed over a period of 23 years, and after the final verse was revealed, Muhammad died. After his death, Caliph Uthman compiled all the verses into a single book. "Qur'an" simply means "Recitation" and therefore the English translation simply means: The Recitation

During the compilation, Uthman used the original writings as well as several compilations (the original writings were vastly spread out) as well as what are called "hafiz" which are people who have memorized the Qur'an word for word. There are people who are hafiz alive today as well. Several scribes attempted to modify the verses and even insert verses into the Qur'an to glorify Muhammad. When Uthman found out, he confiscated all copies with these insertions and burned them in public.

I personally do not believe the Qur'an to contain a clear error and through my studies have not found one. God has promised to preserve the Qur'an in it's original state and since it's inception there hasn't been a single change, something that even it's harshest critics will admit.

There is an offshoot group called 19ers or Submitters that removed 2 verses from the Qur'an because it didn't align with their fetish over the number 19, but the verses in question wouldn't impact the Qur'an at all in any known way even if everyone decided to remove them.

As far as the Qur'an being infalliable, it is the only religious text that I know of that actively challenges the reader to prove it to be false.
 
Jinn, where are you from and what's your ethnic background?

Peace Virus,

I am American, born and bred, and I am white. My bloodline can be traced back to the Mayflower and I am of English, Irish and Scottish descent after that.
 
What does the Quran have to say about homosexuality? Do you accept the teachings?

Peace AdMan,

The Qur'an strongly disapproves of homosexuality but again, I can't force people to believe the way I believe, as the Qur'an also says that I am responsible for my own salvation. No compulsion in religion.

Personally, I don't care as to whether somebody is gay or straight. I am an American and I do not agree with restricting rights of people based on sexual preference. I am a massive proponent of gay rights.
 
Why would God allow His Word to be open to interpretation?

Why not just be definitive?

He is God after all!

Peace Ross,

It goes with the whole "free will" thing :)

I've seen many christian-leaning interpretations of The Old Man and the Sea, but when Hemingway was asked about the symbolism in the book, he replied that there were no symbols... the man was a man, the boat was a boat and the fish was a fish.

I've even seen groups like PETA claim that Jesus was a vegetarian/vegan as well as gay rights groups claim that The Bible supports homosexuality.

Just as extremists will say the Qur'an allows free killing, I don't agree.
 
Peace Mattus,

This is a very interesting question and one that I can answer rather humorously.

Such issues have already been raised due to many various interpretations of the Qur'anic text. One such example was a fatwa issued by Grand Mufti Shiekh Ibn Baaz titled "The Transmitted and Sensory Proofs of the Rotation of the Sun and Stillness of the Earth" Long story short, the Shiekh claimed the earth was flat, the sun revolved around the earth and that all evidence to the contrary was a Western Conspiracy. Although his fatwa used a few verses from the Qur'an, they were taken incredibly out of their literary context of metaphoric descriptions.

However, the most recent hurdle for traditional Islam is that of Evolution, mostly because they take one interpretation to be absolute, when the language of the Qur'an is incredibly adaptable. I've seen it go both ways from both pro and anti-evolutionary stances. As for me and many other Muslims like me, we have no problem with Evolution and honestly do believe it aligns with the Qur'an. Although that would best be saved for another question if it comes up.

I guess the short answer is that the Qur'an, like any piece of literary work, is open to interpretation for those who want to achieve a slant. However, to date, I haven't encountered any passages that directly contradict what we know.

Salamo Alaykum Ryan,

If you say that the quran is like any other literary work..... how can it be the word of GOD?

If it is the word of GOD then it should NOT be open to interpretations like any other literary work.

If the quran was written by God then it ought to be interpreted UNAMBIGUOUSLY.

Otherwise the quran WOULD BE POINTLESS.....because how would we know which interpretation is the CORRECT one?? What would be the point of a revealed book that cannot be CORRECTLY understood.

How should I know that one interpretation of a MULLAH is better than another interpretation of an IMAM and whether either is better than that of Ibn Katheer or yours or mine or whoever????

If GOD should write a book it should be extremely miraculous that every time one reads it the words should IMPRINT INTO ONE’S BRAIN or SOUL or INNER MIND the CORRECT INTENDED meaning and as such ANY AND ALL who read it should GET IT RIGHT.

The problem of Christianity is they cannot read the Bible in its ORIGINAL language and not even Jews can do that either.

BUT....the Quran is supposed to be preserved and available in its ORIGINAL language. And the Arabs can read it and presumably understand it....no?

Then any arabic speaker SHOULD be able to GET IT RIGHT.

But it seems to me that many are NOT AGREEING.

By the way....what is the meaning of those 3 or 4 letter words that start some of the Suras .... NO MOSLIM knows their meaning.....so are they a SECRET CODE..... do you know that in Judaism there are LETTER CODES that are meant to indicate some meaning to the INITIATED..... does that mean the Muhammad was using Hebrew CODE to indicate some secret code to some RABBIS who only them understood these letter codes?


e.g. ALM in Sura 1 (The Cow)

or ALMS in Sura 7 (A-raaf the Heights)

﴿المص - كِتَـبٌ أُنزِلَ إِلَيْكَ فَلاَ يَكُن فِى صَدْرِكَ حَرَجٌ مِّنْهُ لِتُنذِرَ بِهِ وَذِكْرَى لِلْمُؤْمِنِينَ - اتَّبِعُواْ مَآ أُنزِلَ إِلَيْكُم مِّن رَّبِّكُمْ وَلاَ تَتَّبِعُواْ مِن دُونِهِ أَوْلِيَآءَ قَلِيلاً مَّا تَذَكَّرُونَ ﴾

(1. Alif-Lam-Mim-Sad.) (2. (This is the) Book (the Qur'an) sent down unto you, so let not your breast be narrow therefrom, that you warn thereby; and a reminder unto the believers.) (3. Follow what has been sent down unto you from your Lord, and follow not any Awliya' (protectors), besides Him (Allah). Little do you remember!) We mentioned before the explanation of the letters ﴿such as, Alif-Lam, that are in the beginning of some Surahs in the Qur'an﴾.


or KHYA'S in Sura 19 (Maryam = Mary)

﴿كهيعص - ذِكْرُ رَحْمَتِ رَبِّكَ عَبْدَهُ زَكَرِيَّآ - إِذْ نَادَى رَبَّهُ نِدَآءً خَفِيّاً - قَالَ رَبِّ إِنِّى وَهَنَ الْعَظْمُ مِنِّى وَاشْتَعَلَ الرَّأْسُ شَيْباً وَلَمْ أَكُنْ بِدُعَآئِكَ رَبِّ شَقِيّاً - وَإِنِّي خِفْتُ الْمَوَالِىَ مِن وَرَآئِى وَكَانَتِ امْرَأَتِى عَاقِرًا فَهَبْ لِى مِن لَّدُنْكَ وَلِيّاً - يَرِثُنِى وَيَرِثُ مِنْ ءَالِ يَعْقُوبَ وَاجْعَلْهُ رَبِّ رَضِيّاً ﴾

(1. Kaf Ha Ya `Ain Sad.) (2. A reminder of the mercy of your Lord to His servant Zakariyya.) (3. When he called his Lord ﴿with﴾ a call in secret.) (4. He said: "My Lord! Indeed my bones have grown feeble, and gray hair has Ashta`al on my head, and I have never been unblessed in my invocation to You, O my Lord!'') (5. "And verily, I fear Mawali after me, and my wife is barren. So give me from Yourself an heir.'') (6. "Who shall inherit me, and inherit (also) the posterity of Ya`qub. And make him, my Lord, one with whom You are well-pleased!'')




How do you interpret the following

Sura 13 (Ar-Rad = Thunder)

﴿اللَّهُ الَّذِى رَفَعَ السَّمَـوَتِ بِغَيْرِ عَمَدٍ تَرَوْنَهَا ثُمَّ اسْتَوَى عَلَى الْعَرْشِ وَسَخَّرَ الشَّمْسَ وَالْقَمَرَ كُلٌّ يَجْرِى لأَجَلٍ مُّسَمًّـى يُدَبَّرُ الاٌّمْرَ يُفَصِّلُ الآيَـتِ لَعَلَّكُمْ بِلِقَآءِ رَبِّكُمْ تُوقِنُونَ ﴾

(2. Allah is He Who raised the heavens without any pillars that you can see. Then, He rose above (Istawa) the `Arsh ﴿Throne﴾. He has subjected the sun and the moon, each running (its course) for a term appointed. He manages and regulates all affairs; He explains the Ayat in detail, that you may believe with certainty in the meeting with your Lord.)
 
Last edited:
Peace Ross,

It goes with the whole "free will" thing :)

I've seen many christian-leaning interpretations of The Old Man and the Sea, but when Hemingway was asked about the symbolism in the book, he replied that there were no symbols... the man was a man, the boat was a boat and the fish was a fish.

I've even seen groups like PETA claim that Jesus was a vegetarian/vegan as well as gay rights groups claim that The Bible supports homosexuality.

Just as extremists will say the Qur'an allows free killing, I don't agree.

What about those that claim the Qur'an describes/predicts specific scientific discoveries? This remains your interpretation, though it is demonstrably incorrect?
 
Fascinating to have a muslim here for a change.
Welcome :)

I do have a question, which I've also seen asked (and not answered by) to christians.
Why did your god, assuming he/it is the only true and all powerful being, chose to reveal its teachings in such an incredibly limited and unconvincing way as revealing a chosen text in secret to a single man somewhere in a desert?
Regardless of its teachings of peace, islam was spread relatively violently and in a human way and then split into many factions disagreeing with each other.

Wouldnt revealing the quran to everyone on earth at the same time in an incontrovertably godlike way (say flaming writing in the sky anyone can read at any time) have been a much more convincing way to do so?

I know the quran says god will judge those that have been good and not muslim anyway, but that seems a human written cop-out as to why their all powerful god did not show its power at all. After all, if that is the case, there is no need for a religious text to follow at all since god will judge you by your deeds, not the ability to follow some random arbitrary rules.

Have you ever considered the fact that the quran might not be divinely inspired at all, but rather written by a man? And that all the wisdom you take from it did not come from some nebulous outer source, but rather from the creativity of our own species?
 
Do you at least acknowledge the possibility that this is a REALLY reaching interpretation, and that those verses could have been used post hock
to supposedly explain any number of later discovered phenomena?

Can you also explain the purpose of putting vaguely phrased references into a supposed book of revelation? Surly Revelation should result in knowledge. Can you cite one scientific discovery made BECAUSE of Quoranic interpretation, rather then ascribed to a verse in the Quoran AFTER it was discovered independently?

Peace Ross,

I wouldn't see it as reaching when the word "tariq" literally translates into "Knocking" "Rapping" "Pulsing" etc. but I take your point.

I wouldn't exactly say that western scientists had a Qur'an in their back pocket, but while we're on the topic of space (I love space!) I can give you verses that accurately predicted several recent discoveries.

The Big Bang Theory is described in 21:30:
Do not these disbelievers see that the heavens and the earth were an integrated mass, which We then split, and from water We made all living things? Will they not believe even then?

The expansion of the universe, proven by Hubble's Red Shift in 51:47:
With power did We construct the heaven. Verily, We are expanding it.

The Cosmic Crunch Theory is described in 21:104:
On that Day We will roll up the heaven, like a scroll rolled up for books. Just as We initiated the first creation, We will revert it. This is Our promise. We will certainly fulfill it.

The Cosmic Crunch theory states that the universe will collapse back in upon itself. Some proponents believe it will create another singularity.

Hope that helps.
 
Peace Ross,

I wouldn't see it as reaching when the word "tariq" literally translates into "Knocking" "Rapping" "Pulsing" etc. but I take your point.

I wouldn't exactly say that western scientists had a Qur'an in their back pocket, but while we're on the topic of space (I love space!) I can give you verses that accurately predicted several recent discoveries.
None of these are in any way "accurate". They can best be described as somewhere between "hopelessly vague" and "completely wrong".
 
I'm sorry, Jinn, but this is really a bad, bad misinterpretation.

Pulsars are not bright. At all. They were discovered by radio emissions, not optically.

Although there is a pulsar at the center of the Crab Nebula, it is faint. The bright glow of the nebula comes from gas and filaments (atmospheric remnants) that are the result of the supernova explosion that created it.

These are facts of science that you can verify through research.

Given this, do you acknowledge that the Qur'an does not accurately describe a pulsar?


I would tend to disagree, since I take my reference from astrophysicist Alex Filippenko and others.

An example of his views (15:00 in):

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nLHUNkXGXqI
 
Peace Ross,

I wouldn't see it as reaching when the word "tariq" literally translates into "Knocking" "Rapping" "Pulsing" etc. but I take your point.

I wouldn't exactly say that western scientists had a Qur'an in their back pocket, but while we're on the topic of space (I love space!) I can give you verses that accurately predicted several recent discoveries.

The Big Bang Theory is described in 21:30:


The expansion of the universe, proven by Hubble's Red Shift in 51:47:


The Cosmic Crunch Theory is described in 21:104:
On that Day We will roll up the heaven, like a scroll rolled up for books. Just as We initiated the first creation, We will revert it. This is Our promise. We will certainly fulfill it.

The Cosmic Crunch theory states that the universe will collapse back in upon itself. Some proponents believe it will create another singularity.

Hope that helps.

These are terribly vague. Do you also interpret Nostradamus quatrains?

Do you understand what a prediction is? That it is not taking a recent discovery and then going back into an ancient book and finding a particular translation that might be twisted into suggesting that discovery?
 
Peace Ross,

I wouldn't see it as reaching when the word "tariq" literally translates into "Knocking" "Rapping" "Pulsing" etc. but I take your point.

I wouldn't exactly say that western scientists had a Qur'an in their back pocket, but while we're on the topic of space (I love space!) I can give you verses that accurately predicted several recent discoveries.

The Big Bang Theory is described in 21:30:


The expansion of the universe, proven by Hubble's Red Shift in 51:47:


The Cosmic Crunch Theory is described in 21:104:
On that Day We will roll up the heaven, like a scroll rolled up for books. Just as We initiated the first creation, We will revert it. This is Our promise. We will certainly fulfill it.

The Cosmic Crunch theory states that the universe will collapse back in upon itself. Some proponents believe it will create another singularity.

Hope that helps.
but in 51:49 he screwed it up totally.

And of everything We have created pairs, that you may remember (the Grace of Allah).

Leiolepis ngovantrii debunk the Koran :)
 

Back
Top Bottom