• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Merged Artificial Intelligence Research: Supermathematics and Physics

fuelair said:
Yes, we do - for people who ask intelligent questions and/or give explanations that are clear and easy to check/verify because they are capable of providing such. Far too many of those we disparage are so treated because they make no attempt to meet such criteria and clearly do not have the ability to do so.
Click to expand...

Regardless, (a few people from this forum), people from other forums, and or people with actual machine learning experience, have given helpful responses, notably with some of the same questions or content presented by me here (where 99% of the responders here fail to give sensible remarks)...
 
ProgrammingGodJordan said:
Regardless, (a few people from this forum), people from other forums, and or people with actual machine learning experience, have given helpful responses, notably with some of the same questions or content presented by me here (where 99% of the responders here fail to give sensible remarks)...
Click to expand...

That is perfectly lovely for you!!!!!:)
 
Well then

uVGFaLa.jpg


Any comment PGJ?
 
He did have one quite ludicrous one:

ProgrammingGodJordan said:
...

This prior response is information that shows that I had long acknowledged that Bengio had issues parsing some of my queries. (Maybe it has something to do with his French nature?)

...
Click to expand...

Strange then that Bengio's reply is in quite coherent English.

I would again suggest that it is rarely the failing of the reader when trying to parse PGJ posts.

PGJ, listen to people who can actually communicate clearly in English, you could learn a lot, but probably won't.
 
abaddon said:
Well then

[qimg]https://i.imgur.com/uVGFaLa.jpg[/qimg]

Any comment PGJ?
Click to expand...

Consider a following quote of mine:

ProgrammingGodJordan said:
Old data.

This prior response is information that shows that I had long acknowledged that Bengio had issues parsing some of my queries. (Maybe it has something to do with his French nature?)

In that first url above, you will notice another exchange with some one who deals with cosmology/particle physics, who didn't appear to exhibit any sign of parsing problems...
Click to expand...
 
abaddon said:
Oh and let's just note permissions and how bengio is a nice guy

[qimg]https://i.imgur.com/in8tlka.jpg[/qimg]
Click to expand...

What does your message above uncover, especially when the very first gmail exchange screenshot I showed you, already showed that I rephrased a question to put to Bengio?

Also, you should consider:

(1) Bengio is French speaking, as indicated here. (Might have something to do with why Bengio had parsing problem, whereas the person below didn't)

(2) I've talked with another, who didn't exhibit any sign of parsing error, as indicated here.



What do you hope to achieve?
 
Last edited:
ProgrammingGodJordan said:
What does your message above uncover, especially when the very first gmail exchange screenshot I showed you, already showed that I rephrased a question to put to Bengio?

Also, you should consider:

(1) Bengio is French speaking, as indicated here. (Might have something to do with why Bengio had parsing problem, whereas the person below didn't)

(2) I've talked with another, who didn't exhibit any sign of parsing error, as indicated here.

What do you hope to achieve?
Click to expand...
How interesting, now that your claims are being fact checked, you get all defensive. I wonder why that is?
 
abaddon said:
Oh and let's just note permissions and how bengio is a nice guy

[qimg]https://i.imgur.com/in8tlka.jpg[/qimg]
Click to expand...

[IMGw=180]https://i.imgur.com/CIpHftz.jpg[/IMGw]

Also, where did I supposedly claim to collaborate with Bengio? (Can you provide us with a quote, or any indication that I had made such a claim?)
 
Last edited:
abaddon said:
How interesting, now that your claims are being fact checked, you get all defensive. I wonder why that is?
Click to expand...

Well, it is only reasonable to point out the irrelevant posts you are making.

Why bother, when I had long presented a screenshot, showing that I had rephrased the question to Bengio?

Do you not recognize that your messages aren't novel or contain any new information?

PS: Your posts, although not entirely true (such as your accusation that I claimed to have collaborated with Bengio) are actually somewhat helpful, they at least dispel peoples' doubts on whether I had lied about exchanging words with Bengio...
 
fagin said:
Most of us here speak English. Some of us even live in England.

Your use of English is a joke.

Most people here have mentioned that. Do you have problems with comprehension as well as usage?
Click to expand...

I don't know where Bengio's French nature caused his parsing error, but, I can see where others have understood my expressions quite well.

[IMGw=180]https://i.imgur.com/uF9FVel.jpg[/IMGw]

..but I predict you guys shall probably ignore item 2 in this quote, I ponder why?
 
Last edited:
ProgrammingGodJordan said:
Well, it is only reasonable to point out the irrelevant posts you are making.

Why bother, when I had long presented a screenshot, showing that I had rephrased the question to Bengio?

Do you not recognize that your messages aren't novel or contain any new information?

PS: Your posts, although not entirely true (such as your accusation that I claimed to have collaborated with Bengio) are actually somewhat helpful, they at least dispel peoples' doubts on whether I had lied about exchanging words with Bengio...
Click to expand...
Well, I am not entirely without empathy so...

Imagine you sent me a mail demanding that I had over my home to you. Imagine further that I sent a reply telling you to "get lost" or similar.

By any measure, that would be "exchanging words". The term "exchanged words" is thus meaningless without reference to exactly which words were exchanged.

As for "collaborated", while you may not have used that precise word, you strongly implied exactly that. You progressively downgraded it to "had a conversation with", to exchanged emails with", to "sent incomprehensible emails to" as you were pressed by I and others here and finally blamed him for not understanding you in a blatantly racist statement. The one reply you cited was a correction he sent to you and a recommendation that you read his book. You failed to have the basic respect to even ask for permission to cite and then misrepresented the one reply to did cite without permission.

In the face of all of that behaviour, how motivated do you think I am to trawl back through the thread for evidence you will simply ignore anyway?
 
fagin said:
Sounds like you sent him a bunch of emails, most of which he ignored.

He responded to one and suggested you read his book.

That's not collaboration, that's pity.
Click to expand...

[IMGw=180]https://i.imgur.com/hSkXGk6.png[/IMGw]

What is the matter with people on this forum and their bandwagons?

I said that there was no such collaboration, I had asked Bengio some questions.

As he made clear, he couldn't make sense of some of my questions, but later responded after a rephrasing.

He also responded to others as well:


x3RM20F.png



Abaddon, you can fact check the image above too.... (no parsing errors detected though)
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom