• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Merged Artificial Intelligence Research: Supermathematics and Physics

ProgrammingGodJordan said:
Your words remind me of Dexter Morgan's sister's cursing on the "Dexter" series: "Christ on a ******** cracker".



Click to expand...


That’s the best you’ve got huh?

I guess you aren’t joking then. You really ARE that clueless about computer security.

At this point I hope you never get access to the computing power you need for your experiments. The last thing the world needs is an AI that’s been hacked, rooted and violated by every script kiddie with a port scanner.
 
ProgrammingGodJordan said:
If I drew a small sample of my exchange with Bengio, it would have been more valuable than almost the sum total/a great majority of my exchanges here.
Click to expand...


Why do you persist, then? Seriously -- and no offense intended, I'm genuinely curious -- I've often wondered why your type insists on spending hours and hours spewing your stuff on here. There are quite a few here, and the forum would have been poorer (in terms of entertainment) if that club didn't make an appearance here, but what motivates them to keep on posting here despite the constant ridicule? Now I realize you can't speak for the others in the club, so forget the club, but what about you?
 
Chanakya said:
Why do you persist, then? Seriously -- and no offense intended, I'm genuinely curious -- I've often wondered why your type insists on spending hours and hours spewing your stuff on here. There are quite a few here, and the forum would have been poorer (in terms of entertainment) if that club didn't make an appearance here, but what motivates them to keep on posting here despite the constant ridicule? Now I realize you can't speak for the others in the club, so forget the club, but what about you?
Click to expand...

There have been quite helpful comments/criticism by a few here.

Those criticisms have helped me to enhance thought curvature.

And yes, the responses of others here may be seen as entertainment...
 
ProgrammingGodJordan said:
Max Tegmark, probably has a better grasp than you on this topic, and as Max Tegmark expressed in a youtube video here, physicists have long neglected to define the observer in much of the equations. (The observer being the intelligent agent)
Click to expand...

Are you taking the quantum computing route because you believe that consciousness and quantum mechanics are linked (eg, it is not possible to produces consciousness on a classical computer, a quantum computer is required)?
 
Last edited:
ProgrammingGodJordan said:
[IMGw=180]https://i.imgur.com/4fCD9XZ.jpg[/IMGw]
So only you can choose the ones you want?....( well, you and your comrades here)
Click to expand...

Yep, because one of the things that I want is for people to understand me. Another thing I want with my word selection is for the words to not be rude, offensive, or to make people angry. Your mileage, it seems, varies.
 
RussDill said:
Are you taking the quantum computing route because you believe that consciousness and quantum mechanics are linked (eg, it is not possible to produces consciousness on a classical computer, a quantum computer is required)?
Click to expand...

While consciousness is probably achievable on a configuration of classical systems, that route alone would likely be bulky and impractical.

Instead, we already see exponential computational speed up from ever shrinking transistors, including now tensor processing units.

As this shrinking occurs, we naturally utilize more and more paradigms in quantum mechanics, and we also see non-trivial benefits of the quantum world with quantum machine learning platforms.

No belief required...
 
Last edited:
ProgrammingGodJordan said:
While consciousness is probably achievable on a configuration of classical systems, that route alone would likely be bulky and impractical.
Click to expand...

So you'd prefer to do completely theoretical work on the topic, designing things for systems that don't exist rather than actually carrying out the work using a classical system and building something bulky and impractical. Got it.
 
RussDill said:
So you'd prefer to do completely theoretical work on the topic, designing things for systems that don't exist rather than actually carrying out the work using a classical system and building something bulky and impractical. Got it.
Click to expand...

Yes, glad you do... (Those bulky costs though)
 
And what does Bengio say about that?

Let's see

It's a true excerpt. From a gmail exchange. Mostly one-way, him sending me e-mails. That time I responded. Usually I find it difficult to understand what he means in his messages.
Click to expand...

Now what? Jordan?

ETA: You understand, Jordan, that Bengio has given me express permission to repost his replies right here, yes?
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom