• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Army Strong

JihadJane said:
I don't respond to patronizing idiocy.
Click to expand...

No, what you dont respond to is factual accuracy from those who have forgotten more about the subject from REALITY and actually doing it because your agenda doesnt like it.

It leaves you with nothing left to say. When your points face the cold hard facts, they melt like pouring gasoline on styrofoam leaving nothing but hot air and emotionally charged rhetoric.

Sorry, but more often than not- the truth hurts. I didnt make it the truth and I'm not the one running from it and avoiding it.

It does publically demonstrate the inherent weaknesses in your position.
 
JihadJane said:
What is my "post history"?



So just partial genocide will do the trick, then?

Welcome to the Empires' grave yard.
Click to expand...

Your post history is ignorance, plain and simple. And as far as taking out the Taliban goes, if they were all in one spot I would definitely drop the largest bomb possible on them. Same goes for AQ and any other terrorist organization.
 
LONGTABBER PE,
The Sandinista won, and are therefor not terrorists but freedom fighters.
It is important to notice that as it is one of the only two ways the tell them apart.Agreeing with their goals or not is the other one.
 
Toke said:
LONGTABBER PE,
The Sandinista won, and are therefor not terrorists but freedom fighters.
It is important to notice that as it is one of the only two ways the tell them apart.Agreeing with their goals or not is the other one.
Click to expand...

Thats not entirely correct ( very complex issue)

The dividing line ( once again) is in the targeting as to defining terrorists.

I can see ( and have dealt with) "freedom fighters" from various regimes.

I can make the same argument that the Revolutionary Soldiers of the colonies were "freedom fighters" as well. OR were they "terrorists" ( by the modern definition)

Its a vague line- I grant you. Its open to interpretation- thats true also.

I also acknowledge that history has painted both in different lights ( written by the winner)

The US ( and me personally) understands that "freedom fighters" from a politically different regime have a different end goal and "crimes against humanity" may happen.

That happens in every war. ( thus the standing militaries who commit terrorist acts)

Thats much different from groups who start out with no such aspirations
 
funk de fino said:
At lot of false claims, spamming posts and threads.

How proud you must feel.
Click to expand...

Yeah, she wont. I deal with liberals all the time.

They argue from emotion, feeling and the ignorance of the moment.

Always remember- they are driven by emotions, have no clue, cannot think for themselves, dont concern themselves with facts or truth or digging to the root of an issue, they dont consider the complexities or consider the fallout of their actions.

They simply argue- because they dont know any better and cannot do any better
 
PixyMisa said:
If you get hit by a tank round, it doesn't matter much what it's made of.

If you don't get hit, depleted uranium isn't particularly dangerous. I wouldn't suggest that you grind it up and eat it - it's still a toxic heavy metal, though nowhere near as dangerous as cadmium or mercury. But if it's intact it's quite safe to handle.
Click to expand...

Why did Iraq suffer a massive spike in birth defects upon the American invasion? Why are servicemen & women coming home and getting sick and or having deformed children of their own upon exposer to depleted uranium use battlefield?
 
Nosi said:
Why did Iraq suffer a massive spike in birth defects upon the American invasion? Why are servicemen & women coming home and getting sick and or having deformed children of their own upon exposer to depleted uranium use battlefield?
Click to expand...
Evidence? A nice citation to an actual research paper would be really nice.
 
Nosi said:
Why did Iraq suffer a massive spike in birth defects upon the American invasion? Why are servicemen & women coming home and getting sick and or having deformed children of their own upon exposer to depleted uranium use battlefield?
Click to expand...

This is a ridiculously absurd statement. Provide evidence immediately.
 
Nosi said:
Why did Iraq suffer a massive spike in birth defects upon the American invasion? Why are servicemen & women coming home and getting sick and or having deformed children of their own upon exposer to depleted uranium use battlefield?
Click to expand...

What would those (armour piercing) DU-rounds be used against in Iraq?
 
I read of the Bradley's 25mm cannon using DU ammunition as standard.
Since there are no armored vehicles left to shoot at I assume it have been replaced with something cheaper and more explosive.
 
Nosi said:
Why did Iraq suffer a massive spike in birth defects upon the American invasion? Why are servicemen & women coming home and getting sick and or having deformed children of their own upon exposer to depleted uranium use battlefield?
Click to expand...

How do you know this?
 
Toke said:
I read of the Bradley's 25mm cannon using DU ammunition as standard.
Since there are no armored vehicles left to shoot at I assume it have been replaced with something cheaper and more explosive.
Click to expand...

I have been on Bradley's as well as Abrams and yes, we shoot mainly HE rounds nowadays, not sabots.
 
LONGTABBER PE said:
No, what you dont respond to is factual accuracy from those who have forgotten more about the subject from REALITY and actually doing it because your agenda doesnt like it.

It leaves you with nothing left to say. When your points face the cold hard facts, they melt like pouring gasoline on styrofoam leaving nothing but hot air and emotionally charged rhetoric.

Sorry, but more often than not- the truth hurts. I didnt make it the truth and I'm not the one running from it and avoiding it.

It does publically demonstrate the inherent weaknesses in your position.
Click to expand...


An interesting attempt to appropriate, dominate, deny and alter another person's reality, sweetheart.


Quad4_72 said:
Your post history is ignorance, plain and simple.
Click to expand...

Empty ad hominem

And as far as taking out the Taliban goes, if they were all in one spot I would definitely drop the largest bomb possible on them. Same goes for AQ and any other terrorist organization.
Click to expand...


Interesting, abstract fantasy.

Am atom bomb?
 
Last edited:
Quad4_72 said:
No not an atom bomb. A few regular bombs would suffice.
Click to expand...

What is the point of your abstract fantasy?

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Getting back on topic, would anyone like to argue that this emotionally manipulative Army Strong recruiting video presents an accurate representation of what someone recruited into the army will experience in their job?

 
Last edited:
JihadJane said:
An interesting attempt to appropriate, dominate, deny and alter another person's reality, sweetheart.
Click to expand...

Not at all- it was a demonstration of what happens when fact meets fantasy.

It wasnt an "attempt" it was a slam dunk

It didnt dominate- it displaced a fasle one

One doesnt "deny" a falsehood- one disproves it

There is no such thing as "another persons reality"- there may be another persons PERCEPTION of reality but theres only ONE reality and it might be a good thing for you to actually learn about it. You may find the truth interesting
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom