• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Merged Apollo "hoax" discussion - continuation thread

How do people who deny that the U.S. went to the moon explain the Soviet Union part of the equation?

They were all in it together, financial double dealings, secret stuff blah blah blah, you know the drill.
 
How do people who deny that the U.S. went to the moon explain the Soviet Union part of the equation?

They were being blackmailed for - take your pick: corn food being delivered, nuclear threat, they are government and all governments are in on it.

The USSR and the European governments would have seen thru the falsehood because of whole range of issues but the idea that the USSR would have remained silent is just hilarious.
 
They were being blackmailed for - take your pick: corn food being delivered, nuclear threat, they are government and all governments are in on it.

The USSR and the European governments would have seen thru the falsehood because of whole range of issues but the idea that the USSR would have remained silent is just hilarious.


....and if the USSR knew that Apollo was a hoax, then so too would the current Russian government... why would they continue to remain silent.

If Putin has hard evidence of the hoax, I have no doubt he would either let the cat out of the bag, or use the information to exact huge political and/or economic concessions from the US. I see no evidence of either.
 
Last edited:
How do people who deny that the U.S. went to the moon explain the Soviet Union part of the equation?

The more fringe elements claim the Soviets were complicit because both the U.S. and Soviet governments were simply part of the same new world order or shadow government. That's not credible for obvious reasons. A variant claims that both the U.S. and the Soviet space programs were shams, and that despite Cold War enmity they agreed not to tell on each other.

A greater number of claimants theorize the Soviets' complicity in hiding the hoax was purchased as a condition of the controversial 1972 grain sale.
 
They were all in it together, financial double dealings, secret stuff blah blah blah, you know the drill.

They were being blackmailed for - take your pick: corn food being delivered, nuclear threat, they are government and all governments are in on it.

The USSR and the European governments would have seen thru the falsehood because of whole range of issues but the idea that the USSR would have remained silent is just hilarious.

I figured as much, but thanks for replying. The everything-is-a-hoax believers are a tad strange in their beliefs. For the Soviet Union to be involved in the moon landing hoax, they must believe that the Cold War was a giant hoax too? There are some, like at Let's Roll, who believe that nukes are not real. For that to be true...the arch of which is impossibly large and complex.
 
I figured as much, but thanks for replying. The everything-is-a-hoax believers are a tad strange in their beliefs. For the Soviet Union to be involved in the moon landing hoax, they must believe that the Cold War was a giant hoax too? There are some, like at Let's Roll, who believe that nukes are not real. For that to be true...the arch of which is impossibly large and complex.

It's all faked and part of an incredibly complex web of deceit, shadowy cabals and secret plots to rule the world stretching back hundreds of years whose revealing to the world is punishable by death. Easily discovered on youtube though.
 
I figured as much, but thanks for replying. The everything-is-a-hoax believers are a tad strange in their beliefs. For the Soviet Union to be involved in the moon landing hoax, they must believe that the Cold War was a giant hoax too? There are some, like at Let's Roll, who believe that nukes are not real. For that to be true...the arch of which is impossibly large and complex.

I've met a number of Arab and Muslim's who felt that not only was the Cold war fake but that all of modern wester history is distorted to hide that the Christian world has been trying for centuries to 'destroy the Ummah (Islamic community). ie the only part of history that really happened was this conspiracy. Example one professor I worked with a Pakistani Electrical Engineer felt that England conquered India solely to use its man power to destroy Islam but that Allah prevented that...in some way.....

When we interviewed him for the job (his resume and credentials were impressive and we checked them closely - real too) that he had left civil employment in Karachi running the traffic light system because Israeli agents sabotaged the entire system and sold off the stock of spare parts.
 
Last edited:
The same kind of failed thinking that brings us 911 truth and JFK conspiracy theories.

You think it's wrong to have an emergency number for Americans to call when they're in need of assistance? Or were you referring to the ECW wrestler whose only moves were the big boot and chokeslam?
 
Last edited:
I can see how one or more who'd profit from it might be tempted to spin up a scary threat that doesnt exist, or is not as big as it really is.

Think of the fat kegs of gold one or more without scruples could accrue by inflating that cold war threat. Even by a tad.
 
I can see how one or more who'd profit from it might be tempted to spin up a scary threat that doesnt exist, or is not as big as it really is.

Think of the fat kegs of gold one or more without scruples could accrue by inflating that cold war threat. Even by a tad.

So you think all those nuclear weapons and their delivery systems were 'faked"?

The proxy wars? Fiery propaganda.....I presume you are quite young then.

You can take a look at what business sectors did well in from the 1950 to 1990
 
So you think all those nuclear weapons and their delivery systems were 'faked"?

The proxy wars? Fiery propaganda.....I presume you are quite young then.

You can take a look at what business sectors did well in from the 1950 to 1990

No, but it is a historical fact that one side overestimated the other's capabilities habitually.

Proxy wars were real too. Millions died.

The MIC did well for itself, as did the industries who were aided by the MIC, like those of oil, copper, bananas and telecommunications.
 
Hypothetical discussion:


So you think all those nuclear weapons and their delivery systems were 'faked"?


Mostly not.
That'd be my point, thanks.
I'd think follow the $.


The proxy wars? Fiery propaganda...


Thank you for your support.

The proxy wars? Fiery propaganda.....I presume you are quite young then.


Presume away per your perception.
Met any veterans of the (US) civil war?

Every day, I try not to fall for propaganda from every angle. I'm sure you'd do the same, as a wise and seasoned skeptic. (seriously) I'll not presume you are quite young.

You can take a look at what business sectors did well in from the 1950 to 1990.

Yep Thanks again for supporting my (hypothetical) theory.

I think exaggerating for profit happens all the time. I'd never bet against old family ties between Wall St and covert ops which benefit them. Would you?

(I heard they make movies about that.)

What Smedley Butler said.
 
I can see how one or more who'd profit from it might be tempted to spin up a scary threat that doesnt exist, or is not as big as it really is.

Think of the fat kegs of gold one or more without scruples could accrue by inflating that cold war threat. Even by a tad.

Ok, you'll be someone who is too young to have experienced first hand what it was like to live in a world where some idiot might push the button at any time and initiate a full nuclear exchange?

Got it!
 
If the MIC was running everything why did the Berlin wall fall and the USSR collapse and China go capitalistic?

Obviously they lacked some political oomph. I've heard the Cold war described as two groups (e & W) of right wingers stirring the pot and beating the drums for two generations.
 
Ok, you'll be someone who is too young to have experienced first hand what it was like to live in a world where some idiot might push the button at any time and initiate a full nuclear exchange?

Got it!

I remember it clearly and later I was involved with the pointy end of nukes and it was not a cheerful association. I remember our Battalion in Germany figured we'd take 50% casualties the first day the Soviets hit the Fulda Gap -and be reduced to zero combat power by the second day.
 
Ok, you'll be someone who is too young to have experienced first hand what it was like to live in a world where some idiot might push the button at any time and initiate a full nuclear exchange?

Got it!


Really?

He who jump to conclusion risks unsafe landing.
-Confucius
(I think)

I remember it clearly and later I was involved with the pointy end of nukes and it was not a cheerful association. I remember our Battalion in Germany figured we'd take 50% casualties the first day the Soviets hit the Fulda Gap -and be reduced to zero combat power by the second day.

Good thing some idiot never pushed the button. Just because you lived thru it all and believed what they told us doesnt mean there was no room for hype for profit and or advantage. Ike warned us. Propaganda, in other words. We all know about propaganda.

Hypothetically, even if it was not as dangerous as we were told, I recognize how all our firsthand military and civilian experiences would tend to convince one that it was as serious as we were told it was.

I believed all that they told us back then. Duck and cover. We had little reason to distrust them. Except for those paying attention to what Ike mentioned.

I'm not saying it wasnt real and dangerous.

Nonetheless, I can see how one or more who'd profit from it might be tempted to spin up a scary threat that is not as big as it really is.

Think of the fat kegs of gold one or more without scruples could accrue by inflating that cold war threat. Even by a tad. Profit includes gaining power, not just gold. More power can lead to more gold.


...you'll be someone who is too young to have experienced...


I shook hands with a civil war vet. Not that unusual. Some were still with us in the fifties. He was way old.
.
 

Back
Top Bottom