Apollo 11 Moon Landing Revisited: Hoax ~vs~ Debunk

[Thermal]

How would you know what a Photoshopped picture looks like? You know nothing about Photoshop or image editing and compositing and you have no experience or knowledge of how to detect a Photoshopped image.

Your powers of observation are also so atrocious and lacking that you think the Far Ultraviolet Camera/Spectrometer on the left and right images below are "identical", despite them being blatantly and obviously not the same image of it.

View attachment 77358

You're also so lacking in your abilities to interpret images that you posted the following image, claiming that it was an "official NASA photograph taken by Artemis II", despite it obviously being either AI slop or a composite.
View attachment 77359

You also posted the following, thinking it was a genuine photo of a starry sky, thinking that it proved something about film photography, despite it being a digitally generated piece of clipart.

View attachment 77360

Why should anyone take you seriously when you claim to be able to detect something like Photoshopping in an image?

Worse than being clueless about how things like digital images and compositing works (which isn't a sin, most people don't understand it on a technical level), you actually think you know what you're talking about, when you're laughably clueless about the subject.

By 'Photoshopped', it will come to pass that she really meant 'airbrushed'. It will take about 70 pages of bobbing and weaving and ducking dozens of repetitions till she says "well why didn't you just say so? Sheesh!"

 

[Mojo]

Eta: as many have said, you fancy yourself a clever, outside-the-box thinker. You are not.

To be an "outside-the-box thinker", you need to know where the box is. And that's something that "outside the box thinkers" rarely seem to know.

See also "triple niners".

 

[Lukraak_Sisser]

While the science is fascinating in this thread, thanks to all those who add to that, it's also an interesting dive into the mind of someone who refuses to accept she is wrong and will keep digging deeper in order to avoid having to admit that.

 

[Mojo]

The better question is...

The membership agreement doesn't permit me to ask the best question.

 

[Thermal]

To be an "outside-the-box thinker", you need to know where the box is. And that's something that "outside the box thinkers" rarely seem to know.

The box being "reality" does seem to elude them, yes.

See also "triple niners".

That's the frustrating part. She really does seem to think she is fooling everyone here, transparent though she is. The juxtaposition of claiming she is brilliant with the dip ◊◊◊◊ arguments presented is kind of awesome, in a way.

 

[GlennB]

The box being "reality" does seem to elude them, yes.

That's the frustrating part. She really does seem to think she is fooling everyone here, transparent though she is. The juxtaposition of claiming she is brilliant with the dip ◊◊◊◊ arguments presented is kind of awesome, in a way.

I'd say that the 'triple niner' thing is part of the trolling.

 

[Mojo]

You are regurgitating conspiracy theory claims that you don't even understand the details of, which is why you step on your dick so often.

Vixen will not understand that this is a metaphor.

 

[JayUtah]

Trotting out all the old chestnuts. Ten more pages. Zero content.

 

[The Common Potato]

It's worth noting that the sight visible in the shot from the lab was called the "earth sight", as it was literally used to sight the instrument on the earth to get images like this.
View attachment 77338

The elevation scale visible in the other "identical" photo was used in conjunction with the azimuth scale on the base to point the instrument at specific objects which were not visible to the astronauts in bright sunlight, like the Large Magellanic Cloud seen in this image. You can hear Mission Control telling Young to reset the UV to azimuth 275 and elevation 66 less than two minutes into the second video posted by threadworm earlier.

That's a superluminal space peanut.

 

[Reformed Offlian]

Why did Norgay take a photo of Hillary on the summit of Everest if no-one wants pictures of a poxy flag?

Actually, it was Hillary who took a picture of Norgay. Sherpa Tenzing wasn't comfortable with a camera. He's kinda the Buzz Aldrin of Mount Everest.

 

[W.D.Clinger]

Im asking a very simple question. How can you not possibly understand what I’m asking? Are you really this thick?

What do you mean by the phrase “geopositioned satellite”?

No, she isn't this thick. She is considerably thicker.

Stop playing dumb, unless you have no alternative.

For her, the alternative is not to play dumb, but to be dumb. She has put enormous effort into mastering that skill.

She has, for example, invested a great deal of her precious time in failing to understand that electromagnetic waves are not only capable of traveling in straight lines, but generally prefer to do so:

The discussion was to do with the logistics of beaming live tv broadcasts from another planetary body with its own orbit (albeit a moon orbiting Earth) from 250,000 miles away in 1969 when tv broadcasting was pre-cable and largely by antennae reception. Your claim it was a doddle and just like turning on the wireless was what was being weighed up.

We discussed the problems and unless there is anything further you wish to add about the logistics of this broadcast without satellite assistance then do please carry on.

Do you understand that electromagnetic radiation travels in straight lines?

Her ignorance of electromagnetic radiation is settled non-science.

Not everyone is a problem solver.

@Vixen has proved that point to everyone's satisfaction. She is not a problem solver. She is an inveterate creator of imaginary problems.

 

[Andy_Ross]

The discussion was to do with the logistics of beaming live tv broadcasts from another planetary body with its own orbit (albeit a moon orbiting Earth) from 250,000 miles away in 1969 when tv broadcasting was pre-cable and largely by antennae reception. Your claim it was a doddle and just like turning on the wireless was what was being weighed up.

It's a good job they used an antenna then isn't it?

 

[Andy_Ross]

Why didn't I see it sooner? Vixen is actually an Alexa fed into a laptop.

I would ask for a refund.

 

[Jack by the hedge]

That's a superluminal space peanut.

I think I saw them supporting Hawkwind at the Roundhouse in '72.

 

[Andy_Ross]

Yes and this is what was being discussed. If it is so mortifying to have a fond belief put to the test then perhaps avoid contributing to the debate. Just because it is perfectly natural to you for Nixon to ring up the Apollo11 crew on the Moon from his White House phone, for the sceptics amongst us, this needs further consideration as to the logistics of it all. It is not a reflection on you if you don't get what the problem is. Not everyone is a problem solver.

When I was at sea in the 80s and when my dad was at sea in the 50s, 60s and 70s, it was possible to arrange a call from a ship to a shore land line and vice versa.
Why wouldn't it be possible for the US President to do it?

 

[Andy_Ross]

The Carruthers/Conway camera pic looks photoshopped on to me. There is no need for you to go into meltdown heavy sarcasm mode like it's the end of the world.

What about rhe other photos and film that it appears in?

 

[Mojo]

When I was at sea in the 80s and when my dad was at sea in the 50s, 60s a d 70s, it was possible to arrange a call from a ship to a shore land line and vice versa.
Why wouldn't it be possible for the US President to do it?

Vixen is still all at sea.

 

[Mojo]

What about rhe other photos and film that it appears in?

Too inconvenient to Vixen's 'argument'.

 

[Andy_Ross]

I think I saw them supporting Hawkwind at the Roundhouse in '72.

Did you put up the posters for it around town though?

 

[wollery]

I for one am shocked, shocked I say, that 2 separate photos of the same object from very similar angles look roughly the same.