Hello Ziggi,
your blog "http://nanothermite911.blogspot.com" started on December 11, 2012, with an article "
Fund Raiser for New Objective Study of WTC Dust".
The part that actually talks about Mark's upcoming study and the fundraiser links to:
http://aneta.org/markbasile_org/study/
That link is dead now, but you know, we know that "Aneta" is Rick Shaddock's website and project.
It seems you were piggy-backing Aneta, and that actually Rick was the original fundraiser. Please comment on this!.
Oystein, this blog you refer to
http://nanothermite911.blogspot.com is in fact run by JM Talboo just as he runs our main blog 911debunkers.blogspot...I contribute to both but cannot call them "mine" - that honor belongs to JMT. I and JMT posted ALL the original articles and updates for the fundraiser via these blogspots and Rick Shaddock simply copied them to his ANETA page. Our blogspot articles referred readers to Rick´s ANETA page because it hosted the donation page for the project
http://aneta.org/911Experiments_com/WTCdust/index.htm - that was Rick´s part in all this - and since Talboo and I were handling the fundraising and promotion for the study we obviously referred readers to the page where they could donate money
http://aneta.org/911Experiments_com/WTCdust/index.htm. Some of our short promotional articles said something like "if you want to know more about the study/why you should donate then clink this link" and that would refer them to the ANETA page that hosted the donation...and if people did go there and choose to read more about the study before donating money Rick had link named
...that lead them right back to a specific blogspot essay by myself and Talboo,
reposted on ANETA.
Keep scrolling down Ricks donation page and you see that Rick provides links for study updates, again linking to Talboo/Zugam blogspot page and a separate link to a status update report from Basile given to me then posted by Talboo on that blogspot page - again Rick just
reposts it as his own PDF:
Most Recent Status Report
Report on Independent Lab Study of the WTC dust
project_status_august_2014.pdf
Nanothermite911.blogspot.com
And near the bottom of Ricks donation page he again
reposts my work from Talboo´s blogspot to provide his readers with an update
Sunday, August 2, 2015
Mark Basile Red/Gray Chip Study Back on Track
By Ziggi Zugam
So Oystein, Rick´s page was basically copying/relying on our work not the other way around. And for the record, JM Talboo is the originator of this project and the "original fundraiser"...Rick and I came on board later to help JMT.
.......You and JM wrote back then:
....You clearly, personally (you, Ziggi) back then raised the expectation that 100% the analysis would be done by independent labs - NOT by Mark himself. Mark would be at most selecting the specimens. Clearly, by apparently doing analysis himself (dependently), not via independent labs, Mark is ignoring and breaking that expectation. Please comment on this!.
WOW Oystein, how impressive, you accuse me here of having fooled donors when I ran the fundraiser yet you also claim a couple of hours later in another post that there is no evidence that I ever ran the fundraising..
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=11458882&postcount=459
We need to see evidence from Ziggi that he is in fact in contact with Mark Basile, has in fact run the fundraising, etc. All these are unsupported bare assertions as of now
Anyway, it should be blatantly obvious that we raised money to pay independent labs to replicate tests that Basile has done. Basile has been adding to his list of tests that will need to be replicated, and once done adding to that list the independent replication tests can begin and the money raised gets spent on that. Very simple. There is no conflict. And you of all people that has spent years making up stories about Harrit et al not doing tests with enough kinds of equipment should applaud Basile for expanding that list instead of trying to make it look suspicious.
...Ziggi, you now tell us that "the money will most likely not be accounted for until it has all been spent. Some of it may have been spent already." - in other words, that the promise will be consciously, deliberately broken - but you provide no reason for breaking the promise. Please do so now!.
What non-sense. Rick posted a partial email from me as a project update a few months ago where this was discussed. Basile is too busy to meet deadlines/schedules for regular project updates as originally planned so the plan changed. You know this because someone posted a comment on this forum to notify you all of this update:
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=11108021&postcount=334
All the money goes to independent tests as promised and it will all be accounted for once it has been spent as promised. The only difference is that the accounting will most likely be done in one fell swoop once it is all done instead of in installments as money is spent. No need to get your nickers all twisted up dear.
I understand that Rick Shaddock is a donor, and had lost patience at some point. I'll ask him if he agrees with what you say.
I was referring to donors from the general public not people that worked on the project. Rick recently assured both JMT and Basile that no donors have asked for their money back.
