a_unique_person
Director of Hatcheries and Conditioning
-
Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more
Anti-semitism hits record high in UK
- Thread starter Giz
- Start date
Information Analyst
Penultimate Amazing
Stop giving Israel excuses by continuing to chuck their over-sized but generally ineffective firecrackers over the border. Why it should be up to them to break the cycle of violence is another question. Maybe they should toss a coin.
Last edited:
dudalb
Penultimate Amazing
But HAMAS has been proclaimed a "revolutionary anti imperailist orgranization" by a lot of the Left, and that makes them beyond criticism.
Gulliver Foyle
Philosopher
A) By illegally invading and holding onto territory of what should be another soverign state Israel has broken the rules of war as recognised in international treaties and conventions.
B) Currently Israel aren't in a war, therefore what they do in Occupied Palestine is not subject to wartime law, but civilian law. In other words what they do now is illegal under the properly applicable rules.
One question are you a fundie christian, or just anti islam?
Also as claimed by the Basic Law of Israel*, let us not forget.
*What they have passing for a constitution in that country, because there is no point having a constitution according to Israeli legislators, while any of those stinking muslims are still around.
Last edited:
Gulliver Foyle
Philosopher
Seeing as he is quoting the Torygraph, owned by the weirdo Barclay twins who love supressing major news about their friends and major advertisers, I don't think evidence is exactly uppermost in his mind.
And the early part of the 20th century well into the 30s, indeed I would say it took the horror of the Holocaust to dampen anti-Semitism in the UK.
WildCat
NWO Master Conspirator
- Joined
- Mar 23, 2003
- Messages
- 59,856
What cycle? The Palestinians could have peace at any time, they just have to stop attacking Israel. Recognize it and they'd have their own state, as much as that's possible with 2 insane political parties fighting over control of it.
WildCat
NWO Master Conspirator
- Joined
- Mar 23, 2003
- Messages
- 59,856
They were victimized by immigration?
WildCat
NWO Master Conspirator
- Joined
- Mar 23, 2003
- Messages
- 59,856
When did this happen? Do you have a cite?
You are not being serious. That is a dishonest remark.
CapelDodger
Penultimate Amazing
That's not the reasoning, and it does your case no good at all to suggest that it is. The reasoning is that a constitution cannot be negotiated while a state of conflict still exists. Which, of course, it always will.
CapelDodger
Penultimate Amazing
Immigration by a group with the explicit intent of forming their own nation-state on the territory they were immigrating to. Describing this as simply immigration is so ridiculous even you must realise it.
WildCat
NWO Master Conspirator
- Joined
- Mar 23, 2003
- Messages
- 59,856
It's not dishonest. Jews immigrated and bought land. Starting in the late 1800s.
So? It was land claimed by another people that were doing the same damned thing. Then after a big war yet another country owned it, perhaps one you live in. Then after yet another big war the whole area was divided up into a bunch of different countries, Jews given the tiniest slice of all. For some reason it's only the Jewish country that is seen as illegitimate, and of course that has nothing at all to do with anti-Semitism, nosiree. It's just anti-Zionism, or anti-imperialism, but really (wink wink) nothing to do with anti-Semitism!
It was simply immigration, it certainly wasn't an invasion.
That's gibberish. Try to concoct something worth responding to.
WildCat
NWO Master Conspirator
- Joined
- Mar 23, 2003
- Messages
- 59,856
Why is Israel the only illegitimate country created after WWII?
dudalb
Penultimate Amazing
Because that the current Left Wing Dogma.
Rat
Not bored. Never bored.,
You would consider me to be left wing. I do not consider that to be true. Nobody that I consider to be politically similar to me would consider that to be true. Therefore your statement is wrong in every possible way.
I think the Amnesty International report described here is correct. You don't. You support attacks on civilians if Israel carries them out, but denounce them if committed by Hamas.
Not really, except all leave their lands and allow them to be occupied by Zionist settlers, and annexed by Israel. Then they might be permitted to do menial work on them as day labourers.
They are in the position of the native Irish in the days of the Plantations.
Neither Netanyahu nor his Christian Evangelical backers, nor the settlers, want peace. They want a pure Jewish state. The Zionist Christian fundies want Armageddon, as well. If you want that, ultra right Zionism is a pretty good bet for delivering it too.
I asked for something that isn't gibberish, and is worth responding to. So try again.