andyandy
anthropomorphic ape
- Joined
- Apr 30, 2006
- Messages
- 8,377
From a populist perspective it plays quite well - it's the foreign company's responsibility -it's relatively easy to stoke up the nationalist sentiment (as Obama et al are doing)
And obviously BP share a large chunk of the blame....
however, there was some American right-wing idiot on the radio who was blaming Britain for this spill. It was explained that BP was a multinational (British) company - not state owned, but this seemed to cut no ice - no it was a British company therefore it was Britain's fault.
Then I was thinking, if the roles were reversed, and American Petroleum had caused a similar spill off the coast of the UK - well, we have plenty of morons here in the UK as well who'd probably blame America for that.....
So, is there anti-British sentiment in the US as a result of this?
Discuss
And obviously BP share a large chunk of the blame....
however, there was some American right-wing idiot on the radio who was blaming Britain for this spill. It was explained that BP was a multinational (British) company - not state owned, but this seemed to cut no ice - no it was a British company therefore it was Britain's fault.
Then I was thinking, if the roles were reversed, and American Petroleum had caused a similar spill off the coast of the UK - well, we have plenty of morons here in the UK as well who'd probably blame America for that.....
So, is there anti-British sentiment in the US as a result of this?
Discuss