Anthrax False Flag Conspiracy

[skepticalcriticalguy]

This reminds me of Penn Jillette's comment about how CTers "wank to tragedy."
The WTC attack was big and spectacular, therefore attractive.

Oh, there's plenty of CT stuff on the web regarding anthrax.

The main angle is: 9/11 was inside job, and on the eve of the Patriot Act vote, anthrax happened. Leahy and Daschle got it. And the main MSM outlets got it (except FOX). So it was a warning/threat. (That's the theory).

Oh, and American Media, which it has long been rumored has incriminating pictures of W. I've heard (read) dancing naked on a bar drunk, in his younger days, having sex with Victor Ashe, his S&B coffin-mate and lover, and/or snorting coke with Jeb and Bill Clinton. That might explain why The Enquirer was a target! And there was that picture they published of Jenna Bush falling down drunk.

So the theory is that it was a way to get the building evacuated and turned over to the government. It was sealed, and guarded by Wackenhut (a known CIA company), and Rudy Giullini's brand new bio-terror security company got to clean it and search it. Bye-bye photos!!

Oh, and Carlyle (Bush/Bin Laden) owns BioPort, the Cipro manufacturer.

OK, that's the theory that's been out there. I'm just relaying it. Don't kill the messenger. I know, anthrax isn't as "spectacular" or "attractive," (as Axiom pointed out), but this group won the 9/11 battle. Has the anthrax CT been dealt with here yet? I think it's juicy stuff.

 

[skepticalcriticalguy]

Are we saying that the cell the hijackers belonged to in the US was using anthrax to dispose of possible witnesses after the attack?

That's an interesting take.

Maybe dispose of, maybe warn?

 

[R.Mackey]

So the theory is that it was a way to get the building evacuated and turned over to the government. It was sealed, and guarded by Wackenhut (a known CIA company), and Rudy Giullini's brand new bio-terror security company got to clean it and search it. Bye-bye photos!!

Oh, and Carlyle (Bush/Bin Laden) owns BioPort, the Cipro manufacturer.

OK, that's the theory that's been out there. I'm just relaying it. Don't kill the messenger. I know, anthrax isn't as "spectacular" or "attractive," (as Axiom pointed out), but this group won the 9/11 battle. Has the anthrax CT been dealt with here yet? I think it's juicy stuff.

I'm not going to kill the messenger, merely point out that the "message" that, this anthrax scare was cooked up to stop the Enquirer from printing photos, is pretty darn kooky. No sense of scale. A simple arson would have sufficed, if that was the goal, so I don't buy it at all.

Also, tomorrow when I go to work and pass through Wackenhut-staffed security, I'll be sure to let them know that I'm on to the fact that they're all (fifteen-dollar an hour) CIA agents.

 

[skepticalcriticalguy]

I'm not going to kill the messenger, merely point out that the "message" that, this anthrax scare was cooked up to stop the Enquirer from printing photos, is pretty darn kooky. No sense of scale. A simple arson would have sufficed, if that was the goal, so I don't buy it at all.

Also, tomorrow when I go to work and pass through Wackenhut-staffed security, I'll be sure to let them know that I'm on to the fact that they're all (fifteen-dollar an hour) CIA agents.

I wouldn't do that! If they are agents, oh boy.

You keyed in on that one aspect of the CT I relayed. American Media would be an afterthought, right? The main targets would be Leahey/Daschle and the MSM, to get them to go along with the Patriot Act (they were threatening to stop it, up until that point). And/or to not question 9/11?

That's the CT theory.

 

[uk_dave]

I wouldn't do that! If they are agents, oh boy.

You keyed in on that one aspect of the CT I relayed. American Media would be an afterthought, right? The main targets would be Leahey/Daschle and the MSM, to get them to go along with the Patriot Act (they were threatening to stop it, up until that point). And/or to not question 9/11?

That's the CT theory.

The problem with the CT theory (conspiracy theory theory? Crikey!) is, as always, that we (or rather the CTers) assume that a threat from a vague source is going to acheive the desired result.

What if the anthrax scare had actually made the targets more opposed to the Patriot act? How about if their stubborness and bravery made them say "Well **** you secret govt conspirators, you touch me and there'll be hell to pay and no way am I going to bow to the threats you think are going to silence me!"

The conspirators (in the CT) have no way of knowing for certain that their actions will succeed.

In just the same way that to claim the 9/11 attacks were designed to achieve support for a war against Iraq we have to accept that the final outcome was guaranteed and that the US people would rally around the president and give him whatever powers he asked for rather than holding him to account for allowing their country to be attacked.

It's a fine balance and not something I would have wanted to put money on.

We have the benefit of hindsight and if we work back from the end result to the possible scenario which produces that result, we are fooling ourselves into thinking that history had no other paths to take and that it was a forgone conclusion simply because history took the path we see.

It's rather like the suggestion that the US or churchill knew of the impending attack on pearl harbour and allowed it to happen so that the US would enter the war against nazi germany. But it was only Hitler declaring war on the US that (IMHO) allowed the US to fight in europe as well as the pacific, instead of saying "well sorry guys we'd love to help but we've got our own problems with japan so you're on your own on this one"