• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Another terrorist attack - London Bridge

Policemen off-duty are obligated (by honor, sometimes also by contract) to immediately put themselves on-duty if situation demands. This was one such case, though it doesn't have to be anywhere near as extreme. It's the same principle as with doctors, firemen and other emergency services. Being off-duty does not mean you're allowed to ignore problems you're able to and paid to solve.

As a result off-duty police are allowed to carry guns 24/7 in most jurisdictions, regardless of gun carrying laws.

McHrozni

Like I said that requires us to allow citizens to carry guns. Otherwise we'd have to have many accessible repositories of firearms for whenever a police officer decides they are now on-duty and can legally carry firearms.
 
Look, I don't know the statistical record of armed British cops shooting unarmed civilians. I don't know if it matches America and that it would make it more dangerous to arm more British police. I do know that two unarmed cops tangled with these attackers who were holding very large knives. That was before the armed cops arrived.

If this is the threat that needs to be addressed perhaps we should arm all the police with swords?
 
While these idiots might have been sucked in by the ISIS cult, there are usually other issues with these losers.

Pulse: Shooter's alleged lover shows face

Despite the fact the FBI said they found no evidence Omar Mateen was secretly gay despite rumors he had used a gay dating ap, according to a witness on Investigation Discovery, the Orlando shooter was an oppressed gay man and the trigger for the shooting was an encounter with a gay man at The Pulse who said he forgot to tell Omar he was HIV positive until after their sexual encounter.
 
Like I said that requires us to allow citizens to carry guns. Otherwise we'd have to have many accessible repositories of firearms for whenever a police officer decides they are now on-duty and can legally carry firearms.

No. As I said an off-duty policeman is not an ordinary citizen. He has duties that go above and beyond those of an ordinary citizen, duties which may also require him (her) to use a gun. As a result the police officer is allowed, but not required, to have a gun with him at all times where I come from - and our gun laws would make a stereotypical Democrat salivate.

Why would you need repositories is beyond me.

McHrozni
 
Weird country! :)

As they do in the UK!

Off duty police officers still have to behave as police officers, and still have the powers of a police officer in the UK. This is true for many professions, doctors still have their legal authority to e.g. prescribe off duty, and still have to behave appropriately, e.g cannot have sex with a patient off duty.
 
My uncle, when he was a cop in an L A burb, was required by his job to carry his weapon when he was off duty.

My guess is if police were routinely armed in GB (they are routinely armed in NI), then weapons would be issued coming on duty and returned coming off duty. They would only be permitted to carry official weapons. In NI police did carry weapons off duty, but that was a personal protection weapon as they were subject to attack by the IRA.
 
Last edited:
Pathetic to watch the politicians trying coming up with off-the-cuff platitudes about the solutions to Islamic terrorism. Some, like the SNP representative whoever he was, clearly had never even thought about it. When pressed repeatedly about what solutions he could put forwards for people like Butt, he eventually manages, "Er, we need to build stronger communities." Yeah, like the communities that harbour terrorists are not yet strong enough. They are without question the strongest communities in the UK, that's a big part of the problem, you idiot.
 
The police have said - or someone claiming to be a spokesperson for them - they took no action, 'as it's not possible to surveille up to 2,000 active 'jihadis'.

You recall police have been strapped for cash under this government.

Do you thinktthis would magically change under another?!!
 
Do you thinktthis would magically change under another?!!

The worst political grandstanding is from those attacking May for not preventing it, while they themselves abhor the idea of doing anything (Corbyn and his supporters).
 
No. As I said an off-duty policeman is not an ordinary citizen.

In the UK we only have one type of citizens, not citizens with extra rights and powers (an office or job may grant someone additional responsibilities and legal powers) so when an off-duty police officer i.e. a citizen like me is off-duty he has no more rights or legal obligations than I do (excluding contractual employment matters).

He has duties that go above and beyond those of an ordinary citizen,

No they don't.

duties which may also require him (her) to use a gun.

No they don't.

As a result the police officer is allowed, but not required, to have a gun with him at all times where I come from - and our gun laws would make a stereotypical Democrat salivate.

That you have different classes of citizenship is your issue to deal with, thankfully (beyond of course the HRH abomination) we have only one class of citizen.

Why would you need repositories is beyond me.

McHrozni

So that when a police officer suddenly decides she is back on duty she can grab a firearm.
 
Do you thinktthis would magically change under another?!!

The worst political grandstanding is from those attacking May for not preventing it, while they themselves abhor the idea of doing anything (Corbyn and his supporters).

Prior to the attacks at the start of the campaign the Labour party had already pledged to increase police numbers, the Tories started campaigning with further reductions in police numbers.
 
The worst political grandstanding is from those attacking May for not preventing it, while they themselves abhor the idea of doing anything (Corbyn and his supporters).

Similar to attacking Corbyn on the IRA while supporting and arming other terrorist orgs?
 
In the UK we only have one type of citizens, not citizens with extra rights and powers (an office or job may grant someone additional responsibilities and legal powers) so when an off-duty police officer i.e. a citizen like me is off-duty he has no more rights or legal obligations than I do (excluding contractual employment matters).

I have a feeling you have no idea how do professions in question work. These are not professions you leave behind when you come home, if you come across a situation that falls within your profession, you're supposed to help out whether it is within your contract or not.

Or if we turn it around, suppose an officer comes across a hot-tempered ******* he busted a few months ago, and the ******* holds a personal grudge against the officer in question and wants to stab him with a knife. Will the ******* in question have the courtesy to wait until the officer is on duty, or will he attack regardless? What will happen in most cases?

That's one of the reasons why permitting officers to carry weapons when off-duty isn't a bad idea. There are other ideas, such as the case in the OP and more.

So that when a police officer suddenly decides she is back on duty she can grab a firearm.

If the officer is permitted to carry a weapon when off duty that's rather unnecessary, I think.

McHrozni
 
Yes they did, and as you say they were already there! All they could have done was inform the security services of their suspicions, yet the security services had already been informed. Extra uniformed officers would have made no difference. The failing is that there are tens of thousands of wanabee terrorists out there and we don't have the resource in the security services to deal with even a tenth of them, nor could there ever be such capacity.



I don't object to the idea that there should be more beat cops but I suspect you, and Calum Macleod in the referencing post, has no experience of these communities. These aren't nice little communities where a friendly bobby can pop round for a cup tea and a chat, they are hostile ghettos where cop cars are bottled if they make the mistake of even showing up. Even those areas where beat cops are tolerated you can bet nobody will take them into their confidence.

I think you are wrong. The built up Muslim communities of East London, Birmingham and Yorkshire are NOT bottle-trhowing looters. It's important not to conflate the terrorism issue with some of the riots we have seen.

A few years ago a couple of cops knocked on my door and it was a friendly visit. They wanted to know if there was anything in my area that I had concerns about, and, despite living in what is often called 'the poor man's Hampstead' [Camden], I had no issues. Say this was Barking, I might have mentioned concerns of radicialisation in my Mosque, because you know, Muslims ARE reporting radicalisation to police, but many may be loath to actually pick up a phone.

I was surprised at how well-spoken the cops were (public school?) and true to urban myth, they were indeed very young, and awfully nice.

So that is another opportunity to shake off the myth cops are standoffish.

ETA In addition, a local college has signs in the lifts and toilets urging students to report radicalisation attempts.
 
Last edited:
Do you thinktthis would magically change under another?!!

It could, especially if that government wasn't quite so tied to austerity.

Naturally there would have to be an associated change in spending priorities, increase in taxes, increase in the deficit or a combination of those things and it would take a certain amount of time until the additional police officers were recruited and trained....
 
I have a feeling you have no idea how do professions in question work. These are not professions you leave behind when you come home, if you come across a situation that falls within your profession, you're supposed to help out whether it is within your contract or not.

Or if we turn it around, suppose an officer comes across a hot-tempered ******* he busted a few months ago, and the ******* holds a personal grudge against the officer in question and wants to stab him with a knife. Will the ******* in question have the courtesy to wait until the officer is on duty, or will he attack regardless? What will happen in most cases?

That's one of the reasons why permitting officers to carry weapons when off-duty isn't a bad idea. There are other ideas, such as the case in the OP and more.



If the officer is permitted to carry a weapon when off duty that's rather unnecessary, I think.

McHrozni

As a chartered accountant I had to attend various seminars in my workplace and for CPD in respect of the new Money Laundering Regulations that came in circa 2007. A question that often came up was whether we were expected to report money laundering suspicions if overhearing a conversation at a party, for example, and the answer was , no, it is only mandatory within the course of one's work.
 
As a chartered accountant I had to attend various seminars in my workplace and for CPD in respect of the new Money Laundering Regulations that came in circa 2007. A question that often came up was whether we were expected to report money laundering suspicions if overhearing a conversation at a party, for example, and the answer was , no, it is only mandatory within the course of one's work.

That's an accountant and money laundering. Those can (and do) have different rules than other trades.

McHrozni
 
I suspect we are going to have to agree to disagree whether we should have different classes of citizenship with different rights, you are for that, I am not.

You're well into loonytown with these "different classes of citizenship". We have different professions, which have different requirements, different obligations and therefore different rights. It has nothing to do with citizenship, that's Alex Jones level of argumentation.

McHrozni
 

Back
Top Bottom