Another pedophile running for Congress

Didn't the Netherlands and/or Belgium have explicitly "pro-pedophilia" parties stand for election one or two decades ago? Embarrassing i guess but who cares.



Civilized countries don't strip their citizens of their democratic rights no matter how foul or otherwise terrible any crimes they may commit, except perhaps if said crime is directed against democracy. As soon as you start restricting democratic rights for one reason or another someone will demand that you expand those restrictions until only "acceptable" people are able to vote.

I mean this guy is hardly worse than any one of the millions of Americans who voted for Trump and supports his attacks against the entire democratic form of government.

Are you serious?
 
I think it means : I want to be defined as Libertarian, but I was kicked out of there, so I'm using the closet name I can come up with.

Of course I don't understand how can a libertarian be a white supremicist, the 2 seem to be contradicting.

If he's "pro free market" and thinks that it's reasonable for slaves to exist that's one horrible thing but at least it doesn't contradict.

But having specifically calling out whites to be in charge seems like it would require government interference.

If you believe white superiority is the natural order and the government is creating laws to prevent that natural state of things from occurring then libertarianism is a good fit.
 
Are you serious?

What i meant was that letting him vote isn't any worse than letting any of the Trump voters keep on voting despite supporting a candidate who openly undermines and tries to subvert democracy itself.

If anything the latter is far more objectionable given that they actually represent a realistic threat to democracy, where as pedophiles and other crazy voters do not.
 
What i meant was that letting him vote isn't any worse than letting any of the Trump voters keep on voting despite supporting a candidate who openly undermines and tries to subvert democracy itself.

If anything the latter is far more objectionable given that they actually represent a realistic threat to democracy, where as pedophiles and other crazy voters do not.

Collectively, they represent a greater threat to democracy I agree. However, I believe there are some "citizens" who have de facto forfeited their right to vote, this POS included. That's just me.
 
Nathan Larson has been arrested for "misdemeanor harboring a minor" in Colorado, but is expected to be extradited to California on felony kidnapping and child pornography charges.

Larson allegedly began online communication with a 12-year-old girl in California, coaxing her to send him nude photographs of herself, and eventually convincing her to "run away" from her home to be with him. Larson flew to Fresno, waited and picked her up after she left her house in the middle of the night, then took her with him on an airline flight to Washington DC. He was arrested and the girl rescued during a layover in Denver; she was immediately returned to her family.

More here https://www.kctv5.com/known-white-supremacist-pedophilia-advocate-nathan-larson-arrested-at-dia/article_80e3d26e-534e-5d6d-8a37-afb02c3414f8.html
 
Has there been a professional assessment of his mental health? Is he actually mentally incompetent, or is he just another two-bit attention whore playing to the crowds?
 
Has there been a professional assessment of his mental health? Is he actually mentally incompetent, or is he just another two-bit attention whore playing to the crowds?

He's a Neo-Nazi petaphile who advocates raping children. I really don't care about his possible mental illness defense.
 

Back
Top Bottom