Random attacks are possible, but a constant attack system is quite impossible without risking betraying your own ip address, which for FBI is as good as a street address complete with a flat number. You would need a virus to create an attack that keeps going on without your personal attendance, and the virus would soon be discovered and neutralized.
So what?
If they are going to shut down the internet website, how does it affect investors that are physically there doing the transactions? Are anonymous really naive thinking that the stock market works only through internet??
JJM? Nobody uses their OWN IP address for this.
I do. Connect to the website and hammer F5.
No. A bunch of poseurs with delusions of their importance.http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2394071,00.asp#fbid=GyycdNN5pgL
This might be interesting.
Do you think "they" really can?
Exactly.As usual, xkcd already has this covered:
http://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/cia.png
A threat was first made on Oct. 5, as demonstrators massed on the streets in lower Manhattan. But a YouTube message posted shortly after that said, "Anonymous wouldn't attack NYSE on a HOLIDAY -- it is debatable if Anonymous would ever even attack NYSE."
Then came a YouTube video posted on Saturday, using a computer-generated voice which said, "Many people refuse to accept that Operation Invade Wall Street is a reality. ... I am here to clarify that factions of Anonymous are going with the operation. Other factions are opposing it."
The voice, flat and idiomatic, concluded, "Those who are going to be part of the attack have a message to the NYSE: We have you because we don't like you. We are all anonymous. We are all one legion. We do not forgive. We do not forget. NYSE, expect those of us who plan to destroy you."
Ray Pellecchia, a spokesman for NYSE Euronext, said, "We don't comment on security." Separately, a source said the exchange was functioning normally. At the close, the Dow was up 330 points.
It will impact negatively on their credibility now.
"We are all one legion"
-- that language alone is enough to have made me believe it wasn't the ... shall we say, "real" anonymous. They seem to have a better command of English idioms than the "fake" anonymous mouthpieces do.
And of course this will be used to justify elaborate cyber security provisions which will be more for spying and aggregating data on Americans without any suspicion of wrongdoing than actual cyber-security protection. It will also be used to justify an internet-kill switch, and internet censorship.

And of course this will be used to justify elaborate cyber security provisions which will be more for spying and aggregating data on Americans without any suspicion of wrongdoing than actual cyber-security protection. It will also be used to justify an internet-kill switch, and internet censorship.
And of course this will be used to justify elaborate cyber security provisions which will be more for spying and aggregating data on Americans without any suspicion of wrongdoing than actual cyber-security protection. It will also be used to justify an internet-kill switch, and internet censorship.
And of course this will be used to justify elaborate cyber security provisions which will be more for spying and aggregating data on Americans without any suspicion of wrongdoing than actual cyber-security protection. It will also be used to justify an internet-kill switch, and internet censorship.