Anonymous a internet sociological phenomenon?

At first I thought those masks were a little goofy, but after those pictures.. Very creepy. A good choice.
 
Luzz said:
LOL.
It is now difficult to distinguish, isn't it? :D
Click to expand...

Not at all. You've clearly made your point against Anonymous, yet it is Scientology that actively confronts others and not Anonymous at the 2/15 protests. It is the very definition of irony to insinuate Anonymous as inciting confrontation towards Scientology.
 
Kilgore,
Sexual abuse, defamation, harassment, etc. are situations that happen independently of your religious affiliation. I am for putting those criminals in jail, but to target a religious group and pretending that you are "confronting" their abuse is misleading. I do not agree on this.
If you and anons are really concern about their criminal actions then it would make sense to go to the police instead of uploading silly videos on youtube.

I do not expect you to agree with me. This is my opinion and I believe, the opinion of many others who frown upon anonymous.
 
Last edited:
You've clearly done no research into either Scientology or Anonymous. This is where our impasse lies. You are certainly entitled to base your opinion on ignorance, just realize how you've come to that conclusion.

I'm not even sure what angers me more, that you wish to wallow in ignorance, even when provided links and access to information, and still try to reply, or your assertion of the xenutv videos are "silly" which shows you to also be without conscience.
 
Last edited:
kilgore,
This is my last post addressed to you. I was referring to the youtube videos, that is the reason I edited my original post :rolleyes: I know the website xenu has grounds and good information, I even recognised the respectable work of its founder.
Bye
 
And the fact that that very site supports Anonymous, along with Mark Bunker, Tory Christman, and other critics and ex-Scientologists?
 
Luzz said:
kilgore,
This is my last post addressed to you. I was referring to the youtube videos, that is the reason I edited my original post :rolleyes: I know the website xenu has grounds and good information, I even recognised the respectable work of its founder.
Bye
Click to expand...

Xenutv has quite the number of YouTube videos; you might have found that if you had even the slightest inclination of looking things up. And Xenutv is not the same as xenu.net. Xenutv is run by Mark Bunker, while xenu.net is Operation Clambake, run by Andreas Heldal-Lund. Roll your eyes all you like, it's quite obvious you're content to hold your opinion even if it flies in the face of facts.
 
I find the anonymous group interesting though amusing. If the idea that they really are a "stand alone complex" is true then just us having this debate spreads the meme around. Also if true then the group is both innocent and guilty, in that since all act as autonymous units there's nothing preventing individuals in the name of anonymous from doing immoral acts, such as hacking. The group could in fact be splintered without even knowing it.

If it's not the case, then it has a leader and it can be sued.

One thing's for sure. Either it has leaders or it doesn't. A definition of "leader" for the group that says anyone that takes any action are themselves a leader pretty much makes the term "leader" meaningless.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom