Anomolies at ground zero

[Docker]

Poker term. Tell is giving away strategy or a secret you are giving away by consistent moves.

Oh right. Well I dont play.

 

[Garb]

Oh right. Well I dont play.

Which, like I said, is good.

 

[eeyore1954]

How did I mine it? I sourced the entire article.

Because you took a portion of what was said and implied it meant something different than what it meant in it's complete context. the whole article may have been sourced but do you claim yopu didn't just show the portion you did to mislead?

 

[Pardalis]

How did I mine it? I sourced the entire article.

A quick recap buddy boy:

It says that maybe they aren't allowed to investigate explosives.

What did you mean exactly?

Look at my Fire Engineering quote above. That is what I mean.

First off, this is from January 2002.

Also, there's nothing here that says anything about the hypothesis of explosives.

Yes thats when FEMA did its investigation while the evidence was being destroyed. I never said it mentions explosives but it suggests FEMA had been commandeered by political forces

So, Dorker, your claim that FEMA was not allowed to investigate explosives is baseless.

Pathetic.

I never claimed that.

Right, you have misrepresented me once too often. It's time to use the old ignore button methinks

Hey Docker? Did you abandon this thread, too? (I'm always late to the party!). Care to adress the quote you mined out of the Fire Engineering magazine?

How did I mine it? I sourced the entire article.

WTF Dorker? Are you a liar?

I ask you again:

WHAT DID YOU MEAN WHEN YOU WROTE THIS:

It says that maybe they aren't allowed to investigate explosives.

The article that you linked says nothing about FEMA not being allowed to investigate explosives, nothing about exposives.

SO WHERE DID YOU GET THAT FROM?

 

[VespaGuy]

How did I mine it? I sourced the entire article.

I know you sourced the article. It's just that you haven't read it. (If you had read it, you'd realize that the quote that you extracted does not have anything to do with the claim you are making)

 

[njslim]

VESPAGUY

Yes I am a fire fighter - belong to volunteer department in NJ. Many of our
members are career personnel in Paterson. On Sept 11 spent most of
that day and night in firehouse on standby to go to NY and covering for
Paterson who had day shift at WTC fighting fires.

 

[luvhumility]

how does docker get all this energy? Thats what I want to know!!!
sometimes I think he's actually a computer...meant to stir up DLL issues... the behavior is similar...

lol

lh

 

[LashL]

My tell? I do not know of such a noun.

It is, in fact, used as a noun in certain circles, and you've already been pointed to one such instance above.

But that's not the only context in which "tell" is used as a noun.

It is also part of the lingo for those of us who are trained and well versed in detecting lies and liars.

And, not surprisingly, in this particular usage, your tell is still the size of Alaska.

 

[MaGZ]

Has anyone explained the mysterious burns of these cars? Some are "fused" and welded. In., one case the front half is burned and the back untouched.

"WMD at the WTC" claims its proof of thermonuclear devices, but I hasten to add I dont agree with that.

http://s18.photobucket.com/albums/b108/janedoe444/ARG/Image8.jpg​

http://s18.photobucket.com/albums/b108/janedoe444/ARG/Image9.jpg
http://s18.photobucket.com/albums/b108/janedoe444/ARG/Image11.jpg​

Pictures from Judy Woods new paper: http://janedoe0911.tripod.com/StarWarsBeam6.html​

The first photo is from the open parking area northwest of the WTC complex where the second missile hit. This photo is from the DVD "WTC the first 24 hours". In the DVD the cameraman films the burnt vehicles and pans back to the WTC site where we see WTC 6 on fire. The photo was taken in the afternoon before WTC 7 was pulled. The cameraman seems to be asking "How the hell could this have happened being hundreds of yards away from the WTC complex."

Take a look at the closeup view of the burnt vehicle in the NOAA ground zero photo. Again the parking area is northwest of the WTC complex. Please note the black missile crater in the photo.

 

[uk_dave]

My head just exploded.

Again.

 

[MaGZ]

Massive skyscrapers fall and unleash holy hell on the ground. Counter -intuitive outcomes are to be expected. I'd like to see a map showing where these cars were in relation to the buildings.

Take a look at the NOAA map.

 

[MaGZ]

Here is another view of the missile strike in the parking lot northwest of the WTC complex.

The burning flame is where the missile hit.

The WTC complex would be out of view on the left.

This is what you call EVIDENCE.

http://img431.imageshack.us/my.php?image=dsc00105gh0.jpg

 

[MaGZ]

This image gives you the perspective of the parking area in relationship to the WTC complex. Please note WTC 7 is still standing.

http://img431.imageshack.us/my.php?image=dsc00054df9.jpg

 

[T.A.M.]

Bigger question:

Does anyone besides the truth movment give a shaite about how the cars came to be as such...really?

TAM

 

[jhunter1163]

Have you considered any other possible cause for the parking lot fires, say, flaming debris from an airliner raining down on the lot, or perhaps flaming debris from the towers raining down on the lot?

 

[Burrell]

No, we don't care about the cars.

Now if people were paid off, what have they done with the money? Would they have spent some of it by now, after five years? If so the Truth Movement could prove its claims by finding the people that have lifestyles far in excess of their incomes (because something as grand an event as those of September the 11th 2001 would not be given to the lowest bidder) but instead we are compelled to go looking at the same two burnt out cars and being asked to believe that this is evidence of a conspiracy to hide the truth.

Find the people who were paid lots of money to do what has been suggested, then you will find your truth, should it exist.

 

[Pardalis]

Wow, some of these Twoofers are a special breed of odd little people aren't they? At one point in their delusion, they each get stuck in their own little personal theory like in a whirlpool.

We have geggy with his "frontal lobe" theory.
We have Christophera with his "concrete core",
We have Christopher 7 with his "no 10 storey hole in WTC7"
And now MaGZ with his "missile" striking the WTC 7 building.

 

[A W Smith]

was a thermonuclear Pigeon.

 

[Gravy]

MaGZ, I've suggested this before, and since you're dredging up old threads I'll suggest it again:

Watch the video "September 11, 2001: What We Saw." It shows WTC 7 in the same frame as the towers when the south tower is hit. After that, there are clear views of the parking lot where you say a missile struck.

There is no missile.
There is no smoke coming from WTC 7.
There is no huge cloud of smoke in front of WTC 7 at 9:04.
There is no crater or fire in the parking lot.

These things exist only in your imagination.

If you don't want to watch the video, then please don't bring this subject up again.

 

[gumboot]

he cameraman seems to be asking "How the hell could this have happened being hundreds of yards away from the WTC complex."

Yay, someone else who speaks cameranese!

WS CU MS pan left crane up 2S MS ECU zoom in?

-Gumboot