• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Anomolies at ground zero

Docker said:
Who am I this time? I have been every member of the truth movement except Jusy Wood, in two days of being here.
Click to expand...

Its pretty well established that you are pdhoerty by this point. You use the same arguements and phrases. It took a little while, but you kooks always shine through eventually.
 
kookbreaker said:
Its pretty well established that you are pdhoerty by this point. You use the same arguements and phrases. It took a little while, but you kooks always shine through eventually.
Click to expand...

Am I? Thanks for telling who I am. Please give me your email address in case I ever suffer from total amnesia again.
 
Docker said:
Am I? Thanks for telling who I am. Please give me your email address in case I ever suffer from total amnesia again.
Click to expand...


Sorry bub, but when both of you tell the same exact lie by claiming that other folks lied about the WTC core, and both of you react the same way to eveidence to the contrary it kinda sticks out. I know you 911 cranks are remarkably unoriginal, but this is like a kook fingerprint. Sword merely pointed out another example.
 
kookbreaker said:
Sorry bub, but when both of you tell the same exact lie by claiming that other folks lied about the WTC core, and both of you react the same way to eveidence to the contrary it kinda sticks out. I know you 911 cranks are remarkably unoriginal, but this is like a kook fingerprint. Sword merely pointed out another example.
Click to expand...

Would you care to prove your assertion? If not please withdraw it. Thanks.
 
Docker said:
Fetzer won't need luggage, his concise arguments, honed by an experienced academic mind, will render you speechless.
Click to expand...
I admit it's hard to not be left speechless by Jim Fetzer's arguments.

"Scholar for Truth" Jim Fetzer, radio interview with Alan Colmes, June, 2006.

Colmes: Alright, alright, Joe you’re claiming your uncle was on the plane, your uncle died on Flight 93?

Joe: On the plane, and was talking to my aunt during the hijacking.

Fetzer: Oh really!

Joe: I guess my uncle is a liar.

Fetzer: On a cell phone? That’s incredible because you can’t make those cell phones! We have a professor of computer science who’s flying all over the country with different cell phones. He tries...

Joe: Oh God!

Fetzer: At altitudes above 2000 feet, at speeds above 230 it is almost impossible to make the connections. The relays…

Joe: Yo Einstein! Have you ever been on a plane, there is a phone on the back of every seat there!

****

Colmes: What specifically are you saying Dick Cheney did, what was his level of involvement in this? Was he part of planning an attack on the United States?

Fetzer: I have no doubt of that. It’s the only hypothesis that makes any sense. Okay, you’ve got people like Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Richard Meyers, Larry Silverstein, Mayor Giuliani—you’ve gotta look at each of their roles. Larry Silverstein, in New York, actually directed the World Trade Center Number 7 be pulled, meaning brought down by controlled demolition.

Colmes: Wasn’t he the landlord? Why would he want that to happen?

Fetzer: Well, it’s recorded. He admitted it in an interview that he had it pulled. Now, just to make an obvious point, Alan, it can’t have been pulled unless there were prepositioned explosives in World Trade Center 7—

Colmes: What would be Larry Silverstein’s interest in destroying his own building?

Fetzer: He had insured it for $3.5 billion against a terrorist attack six weeks previous.

Colmes: So he’s in on this?

Fetzer: Absolutely.

Colmes: Cheney’s in on this.

Fetzer: Absolutely.

Colmes: Is President Bush in on it?

Fetzer: Well, it’s hard to say with President Bush, the guy’s a bit of a dim bulb, you don’t want him to know too much, he’s liable to let it spill out, so I think Bush is more manipulated than he is—he might, you know, wind up in the role of an unindicted co-conspirator, but Alan, listen, you’ve gotta understand, I can prove all of these things, it’s the only hypothesis that makes any sense and in many cases we have direct evidence, we have Silverstein’s admission that he directed that the building be pulled. That was at 5:20 in the afternoon, it had been hit by no aircraft, it had only very modest fires, that was an extremely robustly built building—

****

Colmes: Are you saying there were not passengers on those planes?

Fetzer: None of those hijackers were named on any passenger manifest. None of them was the subject of any autopsy. Five, six or seven have turned up alive and well, living in the Middle East.

Colmes: Now you’re talking about the hijackers, but the passengers there were actual passengers on those planes, right?

Fetzer: Well, there were passengers somewhere, but whether there were actual passengers on the planes as they were impacting the building is an interesting question.

Colmes: I don’t know the answer to that question, but what I’m trying to—my job is to ask the questions, you’re going to answer them—but my point is that there were civilians, Americans who were on those flights, right?

Fetzer: Well, there were some, but the whole business about how many were paid and that whole sort of thing or compensation—

Colmes: What do you mean, paid?

Fetzer: Alan it’s very spotty.

***

Colmes: Are you suggesting Barbara Olson’s not dead?

Fetzer: There have been reports, that I haven’t been able to verify, that she was arrested in Europe, her husband is now retired and he has moved to Europe. You figure it out.

****

Fetzer: We established objectively and scientifically that the buildings came down by controlled demolition, for example. The 9-11 Commission for example, was so blown away by Building 7 they don’t even mention it in their report.
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
Docker said:
Maybe our friend Fetzer told him the pic was from the afternoon. Bear in mind that Jones was a practising professor at the time, he may not have had time to check those details.

You have libeled him.
Click to expand...
I libeled the academic fraud by pointing out his academic fraud!
Want some more libel, Docker? "Hey, Goebbels: you suck!"
 
Last edited:
Gravy said:
I libeled the academic fraud by pointing out his academic fraud!
Want some more libel, Docker? "Hey, Goebbels: you suck!"
Click to expand...

So now jones is comparable to goebbels?

Incredible. You libeled jones and I pointed it out to him.
 
Docker said:
So now jones is comparable to goebbels?

Incredible. You libeled jones and I pointed it out to him.
Click to expand...

Jones is comparable to Goebbels? How?

Now, please point out my libelous statement. Or you would be libeling me, wouldn't you! Horrors!
 
Gravy said:
Jones is comparable to Goebbels? How?

Now, please point out my libelous statement.
Click to expand...

You said he deliberately mislead. You can't prove that. What is his motive for that, he's making no money and he lost his job.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom