• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Anomolies at ground zero

Horatius said:
So, "Gravy is the pied piper and the rest of the JREFers are the rats of hamlin", and yet, you're the one quoting the exact same BS arguments we've seen for CTist for months now. Couldn't you at least try and make up some new BS?


Say what you will about Christophera, at least he comes up with his own wacky theories.....
Click to expand...

Ok, I believe the world trader centre was rigged with explosives when it was first built.
 
Docker said:
Ok, I believe the world trader centre was rigged with explosives when it was first built.
Click to expand...

Then you are a complete and utter idiot.

What explosives made in the 70's would have a nearly 30 year shelf life?

Where is the detonation mechanism?

Man we haven't heard this looney tune since that guy in the first 'Loose Change' thread.
 
Docker said:
Ok, I believe the world trader centre was rigged with explosives when it was first built.
Click to expand...

So you are saying it was a controlled demotion?

What is your evidence that it was rigged with explosives when it was built?
 
Docker said:
Ok, I believe the world trader centre was rigged with explosives when it was first built.
Click to expand...

hahaha wow...long term plan to blow it up. Are you serious? Not this theory again...I have no movies I can reference for it. What type of explosive and what sort of detonation would it need?

hahahaha I think at this point your just trying to stir the pot. I think you have what we call in IT, the 'ID dash TEN T virus'.
 
Although I should be laughing, I will lightly give you the benefit of the doubt as we all should though I know we shouldnt. Stick on topic now - You have a claim - How do you think the explosives came to be added to the construction, what type and how could they be used to detonate the towers 30 or so years later?
 
hellaeon said:
Although I should be laughing, I will lightly give you the benefit of the doubt as we all should though I know we shouldnt. Stick on topic now - You have a claim - How do you think the explosives came to be added to the construction, what type and how could they be used to detonate the towers 30 or so years later?
Click to expand...

I was joking
 
Gravy said:
Name a claim I've made without backing it up. Right now.
Click to expand...

You claim that building 7 fell. It is still under investigation so you cannoy claim this. You have also endorsed claims that Rodriguez testimony has changed. Totally unsubstantiated.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom