• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Anomolies at ground zero

Docker said:
Yes thats when FEMA did its investigation while the evidence was being destroyed. I never said it mentions explosives but it suggests FEMA had been commandeered by political forces
Click to expand...


FEMA's "investigation" was a nine day assessment of the damage to buildings on and around the WTC site.

I really don't understand what you're getting so excited about.

P.S.... "while the evidence was being destroyed"? Please stop lying. It's getting a bit silly.

-Gumboot
 
I never said it mentions explosives but it suggests FEMA had been commandeered by political forces
Click to expand...

Imagine that a government agency being commandeered by political forces.
 
So, Dorker, your claim that FEMA was not allowed to investigate explosives is baseless.

Pathetic.
 
Pardalis said:
So, Dorker, your claim that FEMA was not allowed to investigate explosives is baseless.

Pathetic.
Click to expand...

I never claimed that.

Right, you have misrepresented me once too often. It's time to use the old ignore button methinks
 
Docker said:
He may have been misled. He only got into 9/11 last year. You cant say it was deliberate without proof.
Click to expand...
:dl:

I only "got into" 9/11 this year. Please explain how Steven E. Jones may have been misled about the photos he used, the text he wrote, and the presentation he gave.

I'm very eager to hear your explanation of the forces at work.
 
Gravy said:
:dl:

I only "got into" 9/11 this year. Please explain how Steven E. Jones may have been misled about the photos he used, the text he wrote, and the presentation he gave.

I'm very eager to hear your explanation of the forces at work.
Click to expand...

I said last year. Why are you misrepresenting me again?

Also may I ask why you have not approached Jones with your concerns? Or do you just berate people on the sly?
 
Docker said:
I said last year. Why are you misrepresenting me again?

Also may I ask why you have not approached Jones with your concerns? Or do you just berate people on the sly?
Click to expand...

You don't know Gravy very well do you.
He has absolutely no problems taking those fools head on.

IIRC he has a face to face debate scheduled with Prof Fetzer.
 
Docker said:
I said last year. Why are you misrepresenting me again?

Also may I ask why you have not approached Jones with your concerns? Or do you just berate people on the sly?
Click to expand...
Misrepresenting? Can you read?
Jones "got into" 9/11 last year, therefore, he may be misled? :eek: :jaw-dropp

I said I "got into" 9/11 this year. Therefore...:confused:

Your logic is breathtaking. Out of curiosity, are you actually old enough to be posting here?

I haven't approached Jones with my concerns? Really, genius? That's funny, someone with my name must be using my email address!

What a maroon.
 
Skibum said:
If destroy means, "won't allow him to get a word in edgewise due to psychotic rants and continuous topic changes" you might be correct.
Click to expand...


I was thinking more about the lecturer in critical thinking taking gravy's weak arguments apart.

Will it be filmed?
 
Second time: Please explain how Steven E. Jones may have been misled about the photos he used, the text he wrote, and the presentation he gave.

I'm very eager to hear your explanation of the forces at work.
 
Gravy said:
No, no carry-on luggage will be allowed at the debate.
Click to expand...

Fetzer won't need luggage, his concise arguments, honed by an experienced academic mind, will render you speechless.

Will you you the tactic you tried in the OKC thread? Set a little quiz for him and see what happens. He's a former marine so i'd be careful.

By the way, do you ever plan to refute the evidence I have provided?
 
Gravy said:
Second time: Please explain how Steven E. Jones may have been misled about the photos he used, the text he wrote, and the presentation he gave.

I'm very eager to hear your explanation of the forces at work.
Click to expand...

Maybe our friend Fetzer told him the pic was from the afternoon. Bear in mind that Jones was a practising professor at the time, he may not have had time to check those details.

You have libeled him.
 
Docker said:
Maybe our friend Fetzer told him the pic was from the afternoon. Bear in mind that Jones was a practising professor at the time, he may not have had time to check those details.

You have libeled him.
Click to expand...

That is funny, the man wrote "academic" papers which he claims are peer reviewed, I would certainly hope he fact checked.
 
Skibum said:
That is funny, the man wrote "academic" papers which he claims are peer reviewed, I would certainly hope he fact checked.
Click to expand...

It's not always easy to verify the time of a photo though, especially from such a confusing event as 911 where tens of thousands of photos were taken.
 
Steve Jones appears to be a very personable man. I don't see his motive for deliberately misleading. I mean he lost his job because of his 9/11 work, he is'nt making profit and he hasn't even made accusations about perpetrators.

Whats his motive?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom