• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Amway TV ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
It's tells you nothing? Seriously? Nothing? Seriously? Nothing? (where's Seth and Amy when you need them).

On it's own, it tells you nothing.

You wonder why people are skeptical about your business? This kind of crap is the reason. You can't give us P/L statements.

And you can't give me P/L statements for a single tennis player! Why not?

You can't even make an estimate of the profit per hour invested UP TO THIS POINT? And if you do it means nothing?

I don't keep track of the hours I put in, in to ANY business I own, so no, I can't. As an entrepreneur the question seems ridiculous. You put in whatever it takes to achieve what you want to achieve. You certainly work out what you think will be necessary when you're doing your business plan, but generally the answer is "whatever it takes".

Put it this way, the "profit/hour" for my Amway business after 18 months FAR FAR FAR exceeds the (profit/hour)-(capital investment) of any other business I've started.

Since you're so keen on this, please show me the profit/hour for the founders of the company your "valuing"

Would it make you happier if we included a valuation of the company in the equation? Company valuations tend to include future earnings so:
total profit + company valuation / hours worked
should get us some kind of idea of the value proposition here?

I have never ever, ever seen a company valuation that included the hours work the founders put in to it. Not one. Have you? Please show it to me.

And while we are on this topic why don't you tell us how Amway business are valued typically? I'm curious if I built up my business to say a diamond level how much I could sell it for.

There's a large number of factors that come in to play in determining that. A business could be generating a certain level of income now, but based on it's structure and other parameters, it could easily be predicted that it will quickly deteriorate without a lot of work - or it may increase. Each business is different. I know of Diamond businesses that have been sold for 3 times yearly net profit, others that have been sold for more, others that have been sold for less but included ongoing lifetime payments to the seller.

Bottom line, your refusal to engage when it comes to actual numbers makes it more likely that this is a scam.

There's been a refusal to engage in bogus numbers that mean nothing. There's no refusal at all to engage in real numbers. The business plan describes *exactly* the income that can be generated depending on the volume and structure you create. Nothing hidden or refused. The average incomes at various levels give you an idea of what that plan results in on average, though obviously there's a large variance in profitability due to differences in structure and expenses.

Every time we see numbers from Amyway they reveal the same thing over and over. Crap profitability for the average IBO

Again - why do you think people doing no work should make money? It sounds almost like you're disappointed that it isn't a pyramid scam!

lots of tools profit for the kingpins

Funny how you won't accept official government mandated statistics on Amway income, but any old rumour on "tool income" will be accepted just fine! :rolleyes:

For the great majority of Diamonds and above, Amway income far exceeds tool profit income.

and a huge lack of any kind of good information on actual profit for those in the middle of the pyramid.

There's no lack of information at all! You can work out EXACTLY what the income will be for any given volume or structure. Expenses vary greatly and depend on the individual, where they're located, what type of business they're trying to setup over what kind of timeframe etc etc.

They can be estimated, and they are, I've provided that kind of information here, it just keeps getting ignored by you. I've also linked you to a forum where real IBOs from around the world have spoken about how much they've been making. Did you go there and ask for details, or prefer to hide here so you don't have to deal with the truth?

Even some quick back the envelope calculations shows the Amway business to be sucktastic compared to almost anything else (it might beat lottery tickets).

You can come up with any figure you like if you want to ignore the data. This post on how much is an Amway business worth caculates that building a solid Emeraldship over 10 years is roughly equivalent to saving and investing $14,000/mth over that ten year period.

So, if you insist ... let's assume 20hrs/wk, that's about $175/hr.

You can't just trot out bonus checks from people at the top of the pyramid and claim that this is a good business.

ROFL!!! That's just plain funny .... you can't just trot out the winnings of top tennis players and claim that reflects what top tennis players earn!

hahaha ... of course you bloody well can.

You have to look at the AVERAGE case.

And I've already told you. The "average" IBO does nothing and makes nothing. So if you plan on being an average IBO then you're not going to make a cent.

For example if the average diamond business takes 10 years to build I want to see the profitability curve for the entire time. If you have to lose money and invest huge amounts of time over a long period that may be the equivalent of investing a large sum.

The average Diamond takes a little under 10 years to reach that point, and earned around $150,000/yr in bonuses. Recent changes indicate that will pretty much double. They'd generally work on average around 20hrs/wk to reach that point. That would normally include some months and years of only a few hours a week and other periods of 30-40 or more hours a week.

Unless you decide to start building internationally, expenses should be covered by retail profit, which is earned on top of that $150,000/yr.

How long does it take the average diamond to go diamond?

A little under 10 years, but the range is from 1 year to 30+ years.

How much money do they make or lose along the way?

Apart from the first few months you'd generally not lose any money at all, and that first few months is repaid fairly quickly. How much they make "along the way" is not easy to calculate as it's so variable. Most Diamonds will tell you they went Diamond in a period of 2-3 years. The average is about 10 years because they spend 7-8 years stuffing around before deciding to get serious. Many of course go Platinum or Emerald and relax there for years. A friend of mine has been Emerald for 20 years and has only recently decided to put the effort in to go Diamond.

People who treated it seriously from early on clearly have a dramatically different income curve to those who spend a decade stuffing around. If I decided to take it seriously and start working today and qualify Diamond in say 3-4 years, what do we make of the last 8 years when I've travelled the world and done nothing?

Once the average diamond stops working the business how long does the residual income last?

Most diamonds don't stop working entirely, they enjoy what they do so they keep doing it, albeit usually at a slower pace.

The first three Diamonds in the business were Fred Hansen, Jere Dutt, and Joe Victor. They're all dead. Those businesses still qualify at Diamond or higher every year.

Dollars per hour is just a simplification of all of these calculations to give an overall idea of how well your time has been spent. If you include company valuation then it's a very good indicator.

Entrepreneurs don't think that way.

As for your tennis pro strawman doing an actual estimate would be pretty easy for a pro athlete. Take the amount of hours they've spent to become good (typically 10,000+ by the beginning of a pro career), the amount of money they've made up to now and divide.

Ummm ... no. You said you wanted profitability, that calculation doesn't even remotely give it. How about equipment expenses? Coaching expenses? Travel and accomodation etc etc?

If instead you want a straightforward calculation like that, a Diamond puts in at most 10000hrs to go Diamond. The 10000hr rule applies to most things in life, but many of the skills to build a Diamond business you've learned before you start. A rule of thumb is 1000 "plans". A plan should take no more than an hour. Let's say 2 hours including travelling and preparation. That's 2000hrs. Half of those you might take through to followup, another 2 hours. 2500hrs. 200 might be interested in getting started, 3 hours. 3100 hours. 9 monthly education seminars - 50hrs/yr. 3 Weekend Conferences/yr, 60hrs/yr. Customers, 200hrs/yr - total 310hrs/yr. Some miscellaenous etc time, you're looking at maybe 5000 hrs committed.

At the end of that 5000hrs (compared to the beginning of the pro career) they're making, these days in the US, $300,000/yr and above. In addition they also get 3-4 luxury all expenses paid trips a year. Like a Tennis pro and endorsements they also get to earn additional income, if they choose, on things like the speaking circuit. Except of course a new tennis pro doesn't make money on endorsements ...

This will show an abrupt edge if done over time. This edge represents the risk inherent in this type of all or none strategy. If you make it big you will make large dollars and everything will work out. If you don't make it big then you will likely not be profitable at all. This is one reason that I wouldn't recommend someone use a pro athlete strategy to run their lives.

The difference between a pro-athlete strategy and building a business is that virtually by definition only a very small number of people can win the tournaments and make big bucks. That doesn't really apply to the same extent in the world of business. Only one person can win Wimbledon. On current statistics, assuming 1000 people registered in a network as business builders or registered customers, and another 1000 unregistered customers, more than 3,000,000 people could qualify Diamond.

The time that you are working without making money is your investment and represents your risk. I personally think most Amway people completely misrepresent the risk involved because they don't consider time to have value.

It's up to the individual decide what their time is worth. Let's try a simple one. In Europe at the moment, Amway will pay you a single bonus of 200,000€ for qualifying Diamond before the end of 2013. That one bonus alone would be 50,000€ a year - more than 40% higher than the average income in the UK. How many hours would you be willing to work for €200,000?

At 5000hrs, that's 40€/hr in just one bonus!

Bottom line, it's a waste of time compared to almost anything else. Sitting on your ass collecting welfare is probably time better spent than "building an Amway business".

If you define "building an Amway business" as sitting on your ass thinking about it, which is what most people who sign up do, and which based on the statistics you quote is how you define it, then you're absolutely correct.

If you look at the actual data and what's on offer, then you're nowhere near correct.

Plain and simple it's a brainwashing business cult that relys on a continuous stream of suckers chasing an unlikely dream.

Plain and simple is you've decided what you believe, you don't care what the numbers say, you'll do whatever you can to hold on to your belief system.
 
Last edited:
The difference between a pro-athlete strategy and building a business is that virtually by definition only a very small number of people can win the tournaments and make big bucks. That doesn't really apply to the same extent in the world of business. Only one person can win Wimbledon. On current statistics, assuming 1000 people registered in a network as business builders or registered customers, and another 1000 unregistered customers, more than 3,000,000 people could qualify Diamond.

Except the you're missing the fundamental flaw in scamway. You need several thousand suckers who are losing money to make any money. So it's EXACTLY like being a pro athlete. Many will try, only a few will get there. Talent and hard work are only part of the equation and in scamway the facts are very much stacked against you.

Plain and simple is you've decided what you believe, you don't care what the numbers say, you'll do whatever you can to hold on to your belief system.

Except that I've been actively involved with the business through my family in multiple capacities over the last THIRTY YEARS. Again are you forgetting that I've met and worked with many of the large pins, including some who started their own systems? I'm not some random guy on the internet here. I've been involved with this business since I was a little kid both in actively helping to manage my dads business as well as selling software to many of the big pins and getting to see their numbers.

Based on my experience it's definitely 100% a scam.

If you define "building an Amway business" as sitting on your ass thinking about it, which is what most people who sign up do, and which based on the statistics you quote is how you define it, then you're absolutely correct.

I define it as doing what the upline tells you to do. Primarly this involves selling people tools and dragging them along to functions (that they pay for). Again this is the AVERAGE case. If I'm looking to buy a franchise of some type for instance I don't look a the BEST example of the franchise I'm buying into, I want to look a the best, worst and average case. If only 1 of 1000 stores was proftable and there was literally thousands of stores opened before profitability I would run screaming.

Everyone should run screaming from scamway.
 
ROFL!!! That's just plain funny .... you can't just trot out the winnings of top tennis players and claim that reflects what top tennis players earn!

hahaha ... of course you bloody well can.

You can't use it to sell people on the idea that it's what they will make playing tennis. If you are extremely lucky, work really really hard and have great natural ability you can be a pro player. Amway is the same thing, there is more needed for success than just doing what you're told. At least if you attempt to become a pro tennis player you won't become a brain dead scamway zombie. You have A LOT TO LOSE in the scamway business, your sanity being foremost.
 
Except the you're missing the fundamental flaw in scamway. You need several thousand suckers who are losing money to make any money.

********. There's no reason ALL of them couldn't make money. In reality most will not try and will mostly be customers getting a discount-

So it's EXACTLY like being a pro athlete. Many will try, only a few will get there. Talent and hard work are only part of the equation and in scamway the facts are very much stacked against you.

Which part of there can only be one Wimbledon winner didn't you understand? Or have you decided to redefine "exactly"?

Except that I've been actively involved with the business through my family in multiple capacities over the last THIRTY YEARS. Again are you forgetting that I've met and worked with many of the large pins, including some who started their own systems?

Which virtually by definition means they were small fry not reflective of Amway as a whole.

I'm not some random guy on the internet here. I've been involved with this business since I was a little kid both in actively helping to manage my dads business as well as selling software to many of the big pins and getting to see their numbers.

Many? You've refused many times to give any information to back up your claim, so instead I'll ask broader questions.

Over the years there's been more than 5000 iboships qualify at Diamond and above.

What percentage of Amway Diamonds do you have experience with?

AFAIK the largest Amway organisations in the world (in no particular order) are

WorldWide Diamonds (Schwartz)
The Plum Blossum
Heckel
Network 21
Extraordinary

Together these groups would easily makeup a great majority of Amway volume in the world. How many of the Diamonds you have experience with are associated with these groups?

Based on my experience it's definitely 100% a scam.

Maybe the ones you were working with were running it as a scam, I don't know. How many of them were associated with any of the groups named?

I define it as doing what the upline tells you to do. Primarly this involves selling people tools and dragging them along to functions (that they pay for). Again this is the AVERAGE case.

Really? "Average"? More than 80% of people who register with Amway don't go to functions.

If I'm looking to buy a franchise of some type for instance I don't look a the BEST example of the franchise I'm buying into, I want to look a the best, worst and average case. If only 1 of 1000 stores was proftable and there was literally thousands of stores opened before profitability I would run screaming.

Which would be fair enough. At the moment however, you're looking at a "franchise" where well over 90% of people who participate fully in the franchise for more than 2 years are highly profitable, but you claim it is a scam because the large number of people who express interest in operating a franchise end up not doing so. When you judge the success of say McDonald's, do you honestly factor in the McDonald's income of all the people who think about opening a McDonald's franchise, and then just buy a Big Mac instead?

That's what you're doing here.

Everyone should run screaming from scamway.

If it ran the way you think it did, I agree. It doesn't.

You can't use it to sell people on the idea that it's what they will make playing tennis. If you are extremely lucky, work really really hard and have great natural ability you can be a pro player. Amway is the same thing, there is more needed for success than just doing what you're told.

Nobody tells you what to do. They will suggest you learn what works, and work really hard consistently for years.

Just like success in any other venture.

At least if you attempt to become a pro tennis player you won't become a brain dead scamway zombie. You have A LOT TO LOSE in the scamway business, your sanity being foremost.

It's pretty clear your experience has made you a brain dead zombie on this topic, so clearly what you say is possible!:cool:
 
********. There's no reason ALL of them couldn't make money. In reality most will not try and will mostly be customers getting a discount-

No the reality is that some of them won't do anything and won't lost any money (but won't make any money). The rest will plug into the system and LOSE a ton of money. This is the typical Amway distributor. Someone that thinks they are in a real business but really are getting scammed.

Which part of there can only be one Wimbledon winner didn't you understand? Or have you decided to redefine "exactly"?

Nope, there can only be on winner and wimbledon and there can only be a few winners for every several thousand amway people. It's really really similar.


Which virtually by definition means they were small fry not reflective of Amway as a whole.


Many? You've refused many times to give any information to back up your claim, so instead I'll ask broader questions.

Over the years there's been more than 5000 iboships qualify at Diamond and above.

What percentage of Amway Diamonds do you have experience with?

Irrelevant. We had hundreds of customers though and many of them were Diamonds so it's not an insignificant portion. I think the main thing to remember here is that YOU HAVE ADMITTED that bad stuff goes on in some organizations. As you are the one selling the opportunity it's up to you to PROVE they are not scams. You have spectacularly failed to do so. Where there's smoke their's fire.

Really? "Average"? More than 80% of people who register with Amway don't go to functions.

Your own numbers in those thread say that ~30% of people in N21 are plugged into the system. This means that for your typical diamond you have a couple of thousand people losing money.

Which would be fair enough. At the moment however, you're looking at a "franchise" where well over 90% of people who participate fully in the franchise for more than 2 years are highly profitable, but you claim it is a scam because the large number of people who express interest in operating a franchise end up not doing so. When you judge the success of say McDonald's, do you honestly factor in the McDonald's income of all the people who think about opening a McDonald's franchise, and then just buy a Big Mac instead?

That's what you're doing here.

Huh? I'm talking about people that are ACTIVE. Not people that join and never do anything. Even if you have an extremely strict definition of active most people lost money. Feel free to PROVE otherwise. You can't because YOU DON'T HAVE ACCESS TO THE NUMBERS (nor do I btw).



Nobody tells you what to do. They will suggest you learn what works, and work really hard consistently for years.

Just like success in any other venture.


But they DO TELL YOU WHAT TO DO. They brainwash you into believing all kinds of weird stuff and generally try to run your life so they can suck money out of you.

Bottom line the "bad groups" as you call them have tainted your business to the point where the burden of proof has shifted onto you to prove it isn't a scam. Your numbers are generally extremely suspect and rosy compared to what you could get away with in a real business plan. Cherry picking the success cases without looking at the avg. experience of someone plugged into the system is bull-pucky.
 
The Amway ads were the worst suckerbait on TV until the Church of $cientology started it's current ad campaign....
 
Dollars per hour is just a simplification of all of these calculations to give an overall idea of how well your time has been spent. If you include company valuation then it's a very good indicator.

Entrepreneurs don't think that way.

Somehow, I think this blanket generalization is wrong. *I* think this way just running my virtual business in EVE-Online, and there isn't even any real cash at stake!

Plain and simple is you've decided what you believe, you don't care what the numbers say, you'll do whatever you can to hold on to your belief system.

:eye-poppi :faint:
 
Last edited:
I'm an entrepreneur myself so I certainly think it's at least a valid way to think about it. It definitely doesn't make sense when evaluating a monetary investment like buying a stock. This is only because the time to buy a stock is minimal. If you had a time investment you would surely try to make sure you weren't wasting time.

Really it's a very simplistic comparison but it gives you a comparison that's valid when comparing to minimum wage jobs. The average person working at MickeyD's is making more money (profit) than the average ACTIVE Amway IBO. So is someone on welfare. Of course the exceptional Amway IBO make a ton of cash, but they do it on the backs of all of these people losing money. Without them they would make FAR less income because they would lose the amway volume as well as huge tool profits.

Of course I could be wrong. Icerat, I would love for you to present a "from scratch" plan on here showing us how we can all get rich selling Amway. I don't think anyone has ever show a plan in a forum before.
 
NewtonTrino,

I'll show you an Amway marketing plan that does not depend on a tool scam. Are you game?
 
No the reality is that some of them won't do anything and won't lost any money (but won't make any money). The rest will plug into the system and LOSE a ton of money. This is the typical Amway distributor. Someone that thinks they are in a real business but really are getting scammed.

This is incorrect. In my old group I gave to my wife, 100% of the renewed IBOs order products and 0% "plug into the system". Statistics from the TEAM vs Quixtar lawsuit showed that less than 13% earn a "bonus on downline volume", "system" statistics indicate only 15-20% participate in "the system" in any kind of meaningful way, yet more than 50% continue to order products and renew yearly. It's trivially easy to earn a bonus on downline volume, and even easier to go to a seminar.

How can you possibly claim these people "LOSE a ton of money"?

Nope, there can only be on winner and wimbledon and there can only be a few winners for every several thousand amway people. It's really really similar.

How? Anyone who develops enough sales volume can be a Diamond. How can anyone win wimbledon?

And how is someone who registers to order products cheaper, then orders them and gets them cheaper - how are they not a "winner"? If someone joins to earn a few hundreds dollars a month, and they successfully do that, how are they not a "winner"?

On what basis do you claim only Diamonds are "winners"?

Irrelevant. We had hundreds of customers though and many of them were Diamonds so it's not an insignificant portion.

Hundreds of Diamons and "many of them" were Diamonds. How many? 20? 50? 100? Even 100 is only 2% of Amway. Were they at all representative of Amway? Did they come from a variety of different system approaches, proportionally reflecting Amway? Did they come from a variety of different markets, proportionally reflecting Amway?

Or were they all from one Amway market (North America), which represents less than 12% of all Amway volume?

Were they all associated with the one system approach (Britt/Yager), which represents less than 5% of Amway volume?

On what basis can you claim such a small, homogenous sample, can represent a large, hetrogeneous sample?

I think the main thing to remember here is that YOU HAVE ADMITTED that bad stuff goes on in some organizations. As you are the one selling the opportunity it's up to you to PROVE they are not scams. You have spectacularly failed to do so. Where there's smoke their's fire.

So what you are saying is since some American's lie, you need to PROVE that you're not lying?

Please do.

Your own numbers in those thread say that ~30% of people in N21 are plugged into the system. This means that for your typical diamond you have a couple of thousand people losing money.

I never said any such thing, and even if I did your conclusions are false. Less than 30% in any month ever participate in the system. New people come in and check it out and decide it's not for them. That's not "plugged into the system".

Secondly, that's not "losing money". When I was "plugged in", I wasn't losing money. We teach that active people should at least cover expenses with retail profit from sales to personal customers. There is zero necessity for anyone to lose money. Of course, some people do. They overspend and/or don't generate the income. A key fact is that the whole setup works better and better the fewer people lose money.

Huh? I'm talking about people that are ACTIVE. Not people that join and never do anything. Even if you have an extremely strict definition of active most people lost money. Feel free to PROVE otherwise. You can't because YOU DON'T HAVE ACCESS TO THE NUMBERS (nor do I btw).

You have zero evidence at all that "most people lose money". There's certainly evidence that some people lose money. Heck, I had a couple in my business that stopped building because they were "losing money". Why? We and most of the group would take a bus or train or share a car to go to a distance event. They'd fly. We'd stay in camping grounds or cheap hotels. They's stay in four star hotels.

There expenses far exceeded their income. And that's somehow makes Amway a scam??

Interestingly, a decade later they're still registered and still ordering products regularly.

While some may lose money, there's also plenty of evidence that people make money. The fact that the majority of Amway IBOs renew their businesses every year would imply that the majority are not losing money.

Again though, what's perhaps most important is that (unlike pyramid scams) the model itself does not require people to lose to function, and indeed works better if nobody loses any money and everyone makes money!

But they DO TELL YOU WHAT TO DO. They brainwash you into believing all kinds of weird stuff and generally try to run your life so they can suck money out of you.

ROFLMAO! What kind of "weird stuff" is ith "they" brainwash you into believing? Weird stuff like setting goals, being persistent, and working hard can help you achieve what you want? Weird stuff like learning how people work and different personality types can help you run a business better? Weird stuff like learning that leadership skills are crucial to developing and leading large organisations? Weird stuff like learning that encouraging people and building their self-efficacy and self-esteem will make it more likely that they make a success out of life?

Oh yeah, weird stuff. Guilty as charged.:rolleyes:

Bottom line the "bad groups" as you call them have tainted your business to the point where the burden of proof has shifted onto you to prove it isn't a scam.

To a certain point there's some truth to that, however even with that problem I believe it to be a great business opportunity. Furthermore, I believe Amway itself, and various leaders, are taking active action to improve perceptions. While it will take time, that just makes it even better. Personally I prefer to stand up for people that are being unfairly maligned because of the actions of a few, rather than just run away and let the misconceptions continue.

Your numbers are generally extremely suspect and rosy compared to what you could get away with in a real business plan. Cherry picking the success cases without looking at the avg. experience of someone plugged into the system is bull-pucky.

My numbers are accurate and I've told you where they come from, check them out yourself if you like. Twice I've seen surveys done of several thousand IBOs where people where asked if they had undertaken the steps of suggested business system as every month for more than 6 consecutive months. Those that had were asked what level in the business they had achieved. On one occasion 100% of those asked had reached Silver Producer or above. On the other occasion, around 98% had achieved Silver Producer or above, the remaining were close to it.

I'm an entrepreneur myself so I certainly think it's at least a valid way to think about it. It definitely doesn't make sense when evaluating a monetary investment like buying a stock. This is only because the time to buy a stock is minimal. If you had a time investment you would surely try to make sure you weren't wasting time.

Sure, indeed the reason I recently sold one business was because I didn't think it was worth the time I was putting in to it, that I'd be much better off putting that time into an Amway business. But it's a far more complicated equation that you suggest, involving often somewhat esoteric guestimates of where the business, and the market it competes in, will go in the future. It's not a simple profit/hour up to that point in time.

Really it's a very simplistic comparison but it gives you a comparison that's valid when comparing to minimum wage jobs. The average person working at MickeyD's is making more money (profit) than the average ACTIVE Amway IBO.

If you looked at new IBOs, then you're absolutely correct, but that would be the case with virtually any business.

So is someone on welfare. Of course the exceptional Amway IBO make a ton of cash, but they do it on the backs of all of these people losing money.

Without them they would make FAR less income because they would lose the amway volume as well as huge tool profits.

That's completely false. If "all of these people" were all making money, the "exceptional Amway IBO" would be making a lot more cash!

Of course I could be wrong. Icerat, I would love for you to present a "from scratch" plan on here showing us how we can all get rich selling Amway. I don't think anyone has ever show a plan in a forum before.

I don't think it's possible to show a plan in a forum. Not one that would make much sense anyway. Here's something to think about though -

The "official" stats in the US from a few years ago was that "active" IBOs earn bonuses of $1380/yr. Now, I think we agree it's a pretty dumb definition they use for active, and not even close to a normally distributed group, but we'll take it anyway. Now, by that definition, 66% of IBOs are active, yet we know no more than 20-30% are "system" active even just for a month. If we assume yearly expenses of $3000 spread over 22% (easy math), that means average yearly system expenses for the 66% are $1000/yr.

That leaves an average profit of $380/yr, not a loss, from bonuses alone.

But it doesn't stop there. To earn a bonus on downline volume you are required by Amway in the US to have at least 50PV of registered customer volume every month. That's about $1800 worth of sales a year, giving a profit of $600 (at 30% markup).

Total average profit of $980 - not a loss.

But it doesn't stop there. Many of the other non-system 44% are buying products, as are some of those not considered "active" at all. The active IBO is getting anywhere from 3% to 29% wholesale markup profit on those peoples purchases - more profit!

Now I know some groups apparently taught people to do things like "fake" the customer PV. But how does people knowingly breaking Amway's rules make Amway the scam? What about groups like the one I'm affiliated with that teach that all of your expenses should get covered by retail customer profit as soon as possible?

Yes it's possible to have an Amway group with people losing money, but it's also very easy to have nobody losing money outside the first few months of developing their business.

Again - the Amway model works BETTER if nobody loses and everybody wins.
 
Again - the Amway model works BETTER if nobody loses and everybody wins.

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php...&postcount=178

It doesn't work at all if "everybody wins."

ETA: This is now the 4th thread ranked by number of posts in the EB&F forum. Here are the top five posters in it:

icerat 243
NewtonTrino 106
3bodyproblem 39
Almo 35
Skeptic 31

It is instructive that the top two both have many years of experience with the business.
 
Last edited:
It doesn't work at all if "everybody wins."

On what possible basis can you make this claim? Apart from being internally inconsistent per se it's likely meaning has no basis in fact.

Please explain.

It is instructive that the top two both have many years of experience with the business.

It's also instructive that I have no personal experience about the groups NewtonTrino has experience with, and make no claims about his experience other than to agree those things happen.

On the other hand, NewtonTrino has zero experience with the organisation I'm affiliated with, nor the great majority of Amway, yet claims to have knowledge about how they operate.
 
I'm done responding point by point to Icerat. His math is from the extremely rosy land theoretical-ville. If people do this, if people do that kind of stuff, not the reality of the business and how it's actually run. Given the fact that Icerat has never been a high enough pin to be privy to how people actually make real money in Amway (and yes I have had that access given my past) readers just have to make their own conclusions. Icerat has fallen hook line and sinker for the scam and frankly is just another mark. If they've managed to con this guy this hard (someone who is obviously intelligent btw) then imagine how they rip through the brains of the average person who hasn't been trained to think skeptically. It's a religious cult built on top of a business. It's run like a cult (e.g. "edification of upline" who must not be questioned). I think one thing to note is that the personal stories of people coming out of N21 really don't differ much from any other organization. Icerat claims my experience with Amway is too limited for me to draw any conclusions. Given that I have VASTLY more experience than he does including having many huge businesses run on my software and having my family involved for 30+ years you have to ask where HIS SAMPLE IS LARGE enough to draw broad conclusions. We both can't be right, can we? I think in Icerats world N21 is some sort of new and better organization. I see exactly the same wolf with a nice new suit on waiting for a new generation of suckers.

Icerat, you've already told us YOU HAVE NO IDEA WHERE ALL OF THE TOOL MONEY GOES and YOU DON'T CARE. The not caring part is typical cognitive dissonance that you get in religious people. You've admitted that there have been abuses in the past and there is simply no reason to believe anything is different at the current time.

Again I ask the reader to come to their own conclusions. The only skin I have in this game is not wanting to continue to see people waste time and turn into brainwashed lunatics.
 
I'm done responding point by point to Icerat. His math is from the extremely rosy land theoretical-ville. If people do this, if people do that kind of stuff, not the reality of the business and how it's actually run.

Uhuh. I've given you actual averages and statistics, all confirmable, as well as case studies with names and what they've said ... you just think it's all rosy land theoretical-ville!

You however have given NOTHING.

Given the fact that Icerat has never been a high enough pin to be privy to how people actually make real money in Amway (and yes I have had that access given my past) readers just have to make their own conclusions. Icerat has fallen hook line and sinker for the scam and frankly is just another mark. If they've managed to con this guy this hard (someone who is obviously intelligent btw) then imagine how they rip through the brains of the average person who hasn't been trained to think skeptically.

ROFLMAO!!! Man, so .... here's the choices ....

1. these guys either have a brainwashing system beyond belief, conning independent legislators and academics around the world, hundreds, probably thousands of companies and their legal and PR .... obviously intelligent people like me ... ;) ... for more than 50 years!

or

2. You're wrong

Gee, couldn't possibly be (2) could it? :rolleyes:

It's a religious cult built on top of a business.

Now it's a religious cult? I'm an atheist dude!

It's run like a cult (e.g. "edification of upline" who must not be questioned).

Wrong again! We are encouraged to question upline as much as we want - how else do you get understanding? We do use "edification" - but it's primary purpose is to get the upline to edify us, not the other way around. You're just clueless outside your little view of the world, aren't you.

I think one thing to note is that the personal stories of people coming out of N21 really don't differ much from any other organization. Icerat claims my experience with Amway is too limited for me to draw any conclusions.

Uhuh. Find me these "personal stories". And ones done by JoeCool pretending to be an N21 IBO don't count! :cool:

Given that I have VASTLY more experience than he does including having many huge businesses run on my software and having my family involved for 30+ years you have to ask where HIS SAMPLE IS LARGE enough to draw broad conclusions.

My sample size? 1. Network 21, hundreds of thousands distributors worldwide and hundreds of Diamonds. 2. WWDB, thousands of distributors in the US and dozens of Diamonds and above

That's where my statistics come from.

Your sample? Where does it come from? oh ... that's right ... it's a secret ... :rolleyes:

And that experience of yours again, how big an Amway business have you built exactly?

We both can't be right, can we? I think in Icerats world N21 is some sort of new and better organization. I see exactly the same wolf with a nice new suit on waiting for a new generation of suckers.

It's quite possible we are both right, at least in our experiences. You're talking about an experience with one particular group and it's offshoots, and I suspect some time ago, I'm talking about other groups. Amway is much, much bigger than you think.

Icerat, you've already told us YOU HAVE NO IDEA WHERE ALL OF THE TOOL MONEY GOES and YOU DON'T CARE.

For freaks sake ... I buy tools from Amazon too. I don't care where that goes either!!! WHY SHOULD I?? (ethical considerations like environmental concerns, animal testing etc aside)

The not caring part is typical cognitive dissonance that you get in religious people. You've admitted that there have been abuses in the past and there is simply no reason to believe anything is different at the current time.

There's zero reason to believe any "abuses" were significant outside of some groups in the past either! There are a number of messages out on the internet from 10-15years ago from people saying that groups are different. Do I need to reiterate?

1. Every "tools" lawsuit is about one particular group and it's offshoots
2. Rich DeVos's "directly speaking" tapes about tools abuses is about one particular group and it's offshoots
3. The PostMa memo explictly refer to just one particular group and it's offshoots
4. >90% of first hand experience complaints on the internet about about one particular group and it's offshoots.
5. This group and it's offshoots make up a minority of Amway
6. There's been very few "new" complaints the past 5-10 years

If it's widespread you have to explain why people with experiences in other groups, by far the majority of Amway, aren't out on the 'net writing about it!

Gee ... let me guess ... they're just better at brainwashing people ... :rolleyes:

Again I ask the reader to come to their own conclusions. The only skin I have in this game is not wanting to continue to see people waste time and turn into brainwashed lunatics.

You are aware that "brainwashing" is a woo theory discredited by mainstream academia aren't you?

Don't you think perhaps you should contact your local psychology and sociology department (not to mention the CIA!) to tell them it's real! :jaw-dropp

get some tinfoil dude, someone's sending strange stuff into your brain ...
 
Still here trying to Ballyhoo the Marks, eh, icerat?

uhh ... no. (though I had to look up Ballyhoo

I've already refused a request to "show the plan" here, and told another party I had no interest in sponsoring him. Not to mention the fact I've already stated I'm not currently building an Amway business.

Amazing how for some, anyone spending time defending Amway or MLM must somehow have an ulterior motive and be some kind of brainwashed zealot, but anyone attacking Amway or MLM ... oh, they can spend as much time as they like on it! :confused:
 
ROFLMAO!!! Man, so .... here's the choices ....

1. these guys either have a brainwashing system beyond belief, conning independent legislators and academics around the world, hundreds, probably thousands of companies and their legal and PR .... obviously intelligent people like me ... ... for more than 50 years!

or

2. You're wrong

Gee, couldn't possibly be (2) could it?


It's clearly #1 for the record. Your argument from incredulity doesn't get you anywhere with me. The catholic church is a much larger scam that's existed for 2000 years just to present one example of a scam with an even larger scope.

Also I'm not saying that Amway is inherently illegal. Legality has NOTHING to do with whether or not it's a scam. I support peoples rights to enter into any kind of contract they want to including something as crappy as this. But please be warned that you are buying into something that treats itself more like a religion than a business.
 
It's clearly #1 for the record. Your argument from incredulity doesn't get you anywhere with me. The catholic church is a much larger scam that's existed for 2000 years just to present one example of a scam with an even larger scope.

Does the Catholic Church have numerous independent non-believers in 80+ countries and territories, and thousands of independent PR and legal folk from hundreds or thousands of non-Catholic organisations - all with a vested interested in ferreting out or avoiding scams - does the Catholic Church have that kind of independent backing?

Also I'm not saying that Amway is inherently illegal. Legality has NOTHING to do with whether or not it's a scam. I support peoples rights to enter into any kind of contract they want to including something as crappy as this. But please be warned that you are buying into something that treats itself more like a religion than a business.

Yup, we encourage faith - faith in yourself.

Guilty as charged. :)

Care to outline exactly how it "treats itself more like a religion than a business"?
 
Your turn for proof.

Easy. According to Amway's own numbers, the average Amway (Quixtar) guy makes $2000 a year -- before expenses.

You'd make far more than that working at McDonald's.

According to Amway's old numbers (1990s -- I doubt things changed significantly since then) you need to be in the top 0.1% or so of distributors to even make $10,000 a year.

The top 0.1% workers at McDonald's make much more than $10,000 a year.

You keep talking about how you are an "enterprenuer", how you "own a business", etc.

That's just brave talk -- putting a happy on the fact that you're working your butt off -- losing money.
 
I think he might be referring to his other business. Of course I suspect that business has something to do with defending Amway on the net lol.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom