Merged American 77 - The Final Word

Last edited:
What a load of nonsense. Another example of 911 truth failure.

Clayton Moore said:
http://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2011/02/11/black-911-a-walk-on-the-dark-side/

Probably the most obvious of all the 9/11 coincidences that prove 9/11 was a false flag attack.
Click to expand...


On the 1st Floor of the E Ring and part of the D Ring, directly in the path of the oncoming airliner, the U.S. Army's Resource Services - Washington (RSW) office, part of the Office of the Administrative Assistant to the Secretary of the Army, employing 65 to 70 people, managed money and personnel for the headquarters staff. By 11 September two RSW divisions had moved from their older, unrenovated offices to their new 1E400 area workplace. However, the RSW director, longtime government employee Robert Jaworski, and many of his people from the personnel, financial management, and accounting staffs, had not yet moved into their new spaces and were still working in the D Ring, Corridors 6 and 7 area, 500 feet or more removed from their colleagues.
Oops, the office was split... over 500 feet away... oops, targeting the budge office was dumb, since the server and the office were not in one place. Oops, a silly lie from an failed 911 truth nut, Mark H.G. Do you read more than the propaganda from the nuts in 911 truth? No.

Wow. Your article is the best example and proof 911 truth is a false flag movement. A fake movement to fool the fringe few who can't think for themselves, they need help to know what to think and when to think it.

The CEO of Marsh & McLennan on 9/11 was Jeffry Greenberg, son of Maurice “Hank” Greenberg, owner of AIG, the world’s largest insurance conglomerate (or second largest, depending on the source).
Click to expand...
Or the 29th largest company in the whole world.
The article, this claptrap, is proof 911 truth is an inside job instigated by idiots to fool the 29 plus most gullible people in the world.

Clayton Moore, has searched out and found a great example of 911 truth failure. Good addition for delusional nonsense on 911. Albeit, it took Clayton over a year to find this article, his debunking skills have never been wrong. Every time he posts about 911 truth, he finds silly failed claims and reports back to JREF, slowly and always with the dumbest claims.



Mark H. Gaffney says... what an idiot; he strings a bunch of junk together and fools a fringe few who can't think for themselves. Then 911 truth movement regurgitates what they are fed, a year or years later.

Targeting the west wing required a difficult approach over the Arlington skyline. The final approach was especially dicey and amounted to a downhill obstacle course, skirting apartments and a large building complex about a quarter-mile from the Pentagon known as the Naval Annex; which sits atop a hill that rises from the flat ground along the Potomac River.
Click to expand...
Oops, flying is easy, the Pentagon was the biggest target for the worse pilot, or the next to worse pilot on 911. Remember Flight 93 terrorist pilot hit short, over a hundred miles short; that is bad, really bad flying.
Hani had the 900 foot wide target, how could he miss.
Dicey? Crashing is easy, it takes an idiot like Mark H. Gaffney to make up nonsense this stupid. It was a straight shot to hit the Pentagon, the trees and rising terrain are on the ground not in the air.

Remember, hills are on the ground not in the air.
Targeting the west wing required a difficult approach over ... a hill that rises ...
Click to expand...
Wow, a hill, that rises? Yes Mark H. Gaffney is nuts, as flight 77 flew over the hill, and buildings, to hit the Pentagon. We usually fly over hills, we use the air; pilots can't see or fly through hills; we are not that dumb... some of us are but no all of us - pick your pilot carefully; 911 truth pilots like Balsamo are proud to say they can't hit 900 foot wide targets, or the 207 foot wide 1300 foot high targets. Bragging about being a pilot worse than terrorist suicide pilots - 911 truth logic in action.


Pentagon attack targeted the multimedia illustrator for deputy chief of staff of personnel, U.S. Army. Wow, an inside job to murder Spc. Craig Amundson, US Army.

Pentagon attack targeted the Army Guard's personnel policy integrator for the Army's deputy Chief of Staff for Personnel; had to be an inside job, who else would do it? Lieutenant Colonel Canfield "Bud" Boone, murdered at the Pentagon on 911.


Mark H. Gaffney is a failed human, failed article; 911 truth failure is the only product, besides insensitivity, and failed claims.

911 truth, shallow research, copy and paste failure.
 
yep a "downhill" approach, its usually called descending and aircraft do it everyday, tens of thousands of times. Flight came in at a 3 degree down angle, same as a landing glideslope.
A hill rising from the location of the structure, OMG, then again this structure lies alongside a river which usually means it will be downhill from the land further from that river. Water,after all, normally finds its way to the lowest points .
Nice that he could make totally normal geography seem relevent.
 
Last edited:
Clayton Moore said:
http://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2011/02/11/black-911-a-walk-on-the-dark-side/



on September 10, 2001, on the eve of the worst terrorist attack in US history, when Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld acknowledged during a press conference that the Department of Defense (DoD) could not account for $2.3 trillion of the massive Pentagon budget, a number so large as to be incomprehensible.[2] Any remaining hope that the US military might still get its budgetary house in order were dashed at 9:38 am the next morning, when the west wing of the Pentagon exploded in flames and smoke, the target of a terrorist strike. Incredibly, the exact point of impact was the DoD’s accounting offices on the first floor. The surgical destruction of its records and staff, nearly all of whom died in the attack, raises important questions about who benefited from 9/11. Given the Pentagon’s vast size, the statistical odds against this being a coincidence prompted skeptics of the official story to read a dark design into the attack. As Deep Throat said: “Follow the money.”
Click to expand...

Probably the most obvious of all the 9/11 coincidences that prove 9/11 was a false flag attack.
Click to expand...

Thanks, Clayton! It's becoming increasingly clear for me now!

Correct me if I'm wrong, but Rumsfeld's speech was to the effect that he would run a tight ship at the Pentagon, that Pentagon accounting was a mess, and that he was going to fix it.

This pretty much exonerates Rummy of any involvement in the Pentagon attack, no? Why would he announce this to the whole world, if he was going to destroy all the records the very next day? And wouldn't most of those trillions have been spent under the Clinton Administration? Why would he risk his neck for them?

And certainly, planning and preliminary work for the 9/11 attacks had to go back to the Clinton Administration. You know; designing, building, and testing remote-controlled aircraft that look just like jetliners (why they used a missile at the Pentagon instead of another remote-controlled aircraft is anyone's guess - maybe the budget ran out, and they couldn't get another appropriation?) Plus, building those secret airbases for landing the phony-hijacked airliners and for launching the remotes. And practicing doing this under the noses of ATC.

It was the Clintons who were behind 9/11! :jaw-dropp:eye-poppi:boggled:
 
Clayton Moore said:
http://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2011/02/11/black-911-a-walk-on-the-dark-side/


Probably the most obvious of all the 9/11 coincidences that prove 9/11 was a false flag attack.
Click to expand...

Wow, getting desperate. Thankfully, I cover this on my Pentagon blog.

http://therightbloggerbastard.blogspot.co.nz/

Look under the "myths" section.

Spoiler: That wasn't the accounting part for the misplaced money.
Spoiler: The 2.3T was recovered in 2002.
Spoiler: It was never missing.
 
So losing track of a couple trillion dollars is proof of an inside job.

This would have to assume that the Pentagon didn't keep duplicate records and receipts anywhere else (which they do), and that the information allegedly lost in the strike could not be reconstructed.

Lay off the weed.
 
Oystein said:
However, I would argue that the Pentagon has high-value offices throughout, on all sides. Whatever a crashing plane hits is going to appear suspicious to a career CTist like you who desperately wants to see suspicious coincidences everywhere.
Click to expand...
Yes. At first the claim was that the Pentagon was hit on an area that was basically empty and that was suspicious because the number of military casualties was reduced that way, implying that the military were behind it. I see how that story has mutated and now the suspicious fact is what office(s) was/were destroyed.




beachnut said:
What? LOL, the turn was done at 270 to 325 knots,
Click to expand...
Indeed. It was a spiral descent. A poorly executed one, done by a ****** pilot. The plane actually climbed at some points of the descent.

Julio-AA77-FDR.jpg


Vertical scale exaggerated to emphasize the point:

Julio-descenso2.PNG


(thanks to Julio of 11-s.eu.org for the images)

By the way, 325? The graph is small but doesn't seem to show the speed to be above 300.
 
If only there had been some electronic method of storing information so that these types of false flags couldn't occur. Someone should really invent some kind of device that does this.
 
Sceptic-PK said:
If only there had been some electronic method of storing information so that these types of false flags couldn't occur. Someone should really invent some kind of device that does this.
Click to expand...

Perhaps an on board digital storage unit that polls various flight parameters and records them! Perhaps also a method by which radar returns can be recorded and played back. Either one would be able to show aircraft velocity. Someone really should look into this.
 
Last edited:
Sceptic-PK said:
If only there had been some electronic method of storing information so that these types of false flags couldn't occur. Someone should really invent some kind of device that does this.
Click to expand...

And before they had computers they could have devised some method of duplicating or even triplicating hard copies of documents as they were being produced to avoid loss of information in the event of damage to one of their document storage areas. I'm thinking some kind of carbon impregnated paper that would transfer onto the sheet of paper below it when pressure was applied.
 
Sceptic-PK said:
If only there had been some electronic method of storing information so that these types of false flags couldn't occur. Someone should really invent some kind of device that does this.
Click to expand...

On the other hand, if the illuminati/NWO could just master fire, perhaps they could have just started one, instead of piloting four separate planes and destroying two unrelated buildings and a field in Pennsylvania in the process. I would be more frightened of them if they weren't so grossly incompetent.
 
bob_kark said:
On the other hand, if the illuminati/NWO could just master fire, perhaps they could have just started one, instead of piloting four separate planes and destroying two unrelated buildings and a field in Pennsylvania in the process. I would be more frightened of them if they weren't so grossly incompetent.
Click to expand...

You'll see, once we master the sharks with the frickin' laser beams.
 
Clayton Moore said:
How would an inexperienced pilot know when to start the maneuver?
Click to expand...

He'd probably look for the target he wanted to hit and give himself plenty of room to descend and line up.


Clayton Moore said:
How would an inexperienced pilot know when to begin to come out of the maneuver?
Click to expand...

When he sees his target ahead of him.


Clayton Moore said:
How would an inexperienced pilot know when to end the maneuver and go straight into the Pentagon?
Click to expand...

When he sees his target ahead of him.

I hope you never had to go through a roundabout when you were learning to drive.
 
Reactor drone said:
He'd probably look for the target he wanted to hit and give himself plenty of room to descend and line up.
Click to expand...
99.78% of the people here would be smart enough to agree


When he sees his target ahead of him.
Click to expand...


99.78% of the people here would be smart enough to agree

When he sees his target ahead of him.
Click to expand...

99.78% of the people here would be smart enough to agree
I hope you never had to go through a roundabout when you were learning to drive.
Click to expand...
An apt comparison, and Hanjour did not have to signal when exiting the turn.:)
Fact is that it was a typical 3 minute turn and if one is flying level then banks to turn without increasing power or using elevator to counter loss of vertical lift, the plane will descend anyway. A three minute LEVEL turn is harder for a novice pilot!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom