Merged American 77 - The Final Word

jaydeehess said:
99.78% of the people here would be smart enough to agree





99.78% of the people here would be smart enough to agree



99.78% of the people here would be smart enough to agree

An apt comparison, and Hanjour did not have to signal when exiting the turn.:)
Fact is that it was a typical 3 minute turn and if one is flying level then banks to turn without increasing power or using elevator to counter loss of vertical lift, the plane will descend anyway. A three minute LEVEL turn is harder for a novice pilot!
Click to expand...


And to Clayton's original questions:

When I'm with a brand new student and they ask me what direction to fly, I usually just pick something prominent on the ground, point to it, and say "go that way". If we need to do something really exotic, such as reversing course, I might say something like "turn around and fly towards the power plant stacks back there..."
 
Reactor drone said:
He'd probably look for the target he wanted to hit and give himself plenty of room to descend and line up.




When he sees his target ahead of him.




When he sees his target ahead of him.

I hope you never had to go through a roundabout when you were learning to drive.
Click to expand...

:D
 
jaydeehess said:
99.78% of the people here would be smart enough to agree





99.78% of the people here would be smart enough to agree



99.78% of the people here would be smart enough to agree

An apt comparison, and Hanjour did not have to signal when exiting the turn.:)
Fact is that it was a typical 3 minute turn and if one is flying level then banks to turn without increasing power or using elevator to counter loss of vertical lift, the plane will descend anyway. A three minute LEVEL turn is harder for a novice pilot!
Click to expand...

You're off a little. He originally claimed he was smarter than 99.78 people, not a percentage. ;)
 
Figured I'd post here the 'change log' for my blog, seeing as it constantly updates as I come across more relevant information.

Change log as of 23/07/13

- Added "The Maneuver" section, thanks to some fantastic graphs posted in this thread by pgimeno.

- Removed broken link to 'Madday Over The Pacific' as all copies of this seemed to have been removed by Youtube, replaced instead with excepts from Wikipedia detailing the stresses Flight 006 underwent.

- Added/Expanded a 'The Myths' section, including videos rebutting the '$2.3T lost' claim, Norman Mineta statement (thanks Boone), Dick Cheney, Norad etc.

- Added a subsection under 'AA77 Radar' with the new research by Tom Lusch regarding radar sort boxes and AA77's "disappearance" over Indianapolis, detailed here.

- Various tweaks/formating changes.


Constantly looking for any other relevant information to include, so any additional suggestions are welcome.

btw, if anyone has an active account to DIF, I'd be interesting to see the response to this over there ;)

All for now :cool:
 
Last edited:
cjnewson88 said:
Figured I'd post here the 'change log' for my blog, seeing as it constantly updates as I come across more relevant information.

Change log as of 23/07/13

- Added "The Maneuver" section, thanks to some fantastic graphs posted in this thread by pgimeno.

- Removed broken link to 'Madday Over The Pacific' as all copies of this seemed to have been removed by Youtube, replaced instead with excepts from Wikipedia detailing the stresses Flight 006 underwent.

- Added/Expanded a 'The Myths' section, including videos rebutting the '$2.3T lost' claim, Norman Mineta statement (thanks Boone), Dick Cheney, Norad etc.

- Added a subsection under 'AA77 Radar' with the new research by Tom Lusch regarding radar sort boxes and AA77's "disappearance" over Indianapolis, detailed here.

- Various tweaks/formating changes.


Constantly looking for any other relevant information to include, so any additional suggestions are welcome.

btw, if anyone has an active account to DIF, I'd be interesting to see the response to this over there ;)

All for now :cool:
Click to expand...
What's the DIF?
 
Quick change log to blog.

- Added Arlington County Police Dispatch call (contains eye witnesses).

- Added sub section for the military response to AA77.

- Added (but not directly linked) a link to the Moussaoui trial exhibits for those who want to see the human remains.
 
Excellent page. Truly a plethora of documented facts and real evidence that Truthers blatantly ignore in order to avoid cognitive dissonance and keep believing in their magical CT about invisible, disappearing, dodging missiles loaded with jet fuel. It is truly abhorrent how outright ignorant and brainwashed the Twoofers are. In fact, it is almost as if they are intentionally distorting the facts and believing in 100% of the outlandish claims they read on kook blogs in order to further some sort of surreptitious right wing extremist loon agenda, because it is downright impossible for someone to be THAT stupid and willfully ignorant.
What's funny is that NO Truther has ever given me a reason as to *why* the government would use a freakin' missile to begin with in broad daylight. They would have to assume that NO ONE would see it and that 100% of it could be cleaned up and subsequently destroyed. Then they would have had to bribe 130+ witnesses and secretly plant tons of debris directly attributable to Flight 77. They would have also had to fake security footage of Hanjour, make up fake documents, make up fake passengers, and create false radar tracks, among a hundred other things. WTF! And, it is quite odd that Box Boy or any of the other charlatans in AE911Twoof refuse to talk about the Pentagon. Wonder why?
But why would they do all of this INSTEAD of just using a plane to begin with? Have you met a Truther who has given any sort of reasoning for this?
 
cjnewson88 said:
Hi all.

So as some of you know, around September last year I began a single blog post to list and organise all the available evidence from 9/11 regarding the Pentagon incident into a single, easy to follow list of information for people to work through. The aim, of course, was to provide as much evidence as is available to show people that the conspiracy claims simply do not hold water, and that the only conclusion one should draw based on the evidence is that American 77, and only American 77, piloted by Hani Hanjour, hit the Pentagon.

Since its creation, I have been gradually adding more information and making the page more user friendly. Aside from lacking the knowledge on how the make a linkable table of contents, I have now reached the point where I believe the page now shows as much evidence as is available, and there is little more I can add.

The blog URL is as follows;

http://therightbloggerbastard.blogspot.co.nz/2012/09/american-airlines-77-hit-pentagon.html

I put it to you guys to suggest anything I may have missed, but more importantly to share this around, and help dismiss the conspiracy theories regarding this incident.

For those who go regularly into the comments sections on youtube, you can copy/paste the following shortened URL, which youtube allows with no editing, and links directly to the blog;

therightbloggerbastard.blogspot.co.nz

So pretty much, next time someone comes along and starts spouting Pentagon conspiracy nonsense, either here, other forums, facebook or youtube, please link them to this blog.

Cheers guys,
Suggestions are welcome. :cool:
Click to expand...

I suggest you get some of those security videos that were confiscated shortly after the Pentagon "attack", over 40 or so, and publish them. Then tell us why they were confiscated, why they haven't been released, and how/why the agents were deployed so rapidly for such a mundane task with the entire still DC area in jeopardy?
 
911KookDetector said:
Excellent page.
Click to expand...

Why thank you :)


What's funny is that NO Truther has ever given me a reason as to *why* the government would use a freakin' missile to begin with in broad daylight.
Click to expand...

Pretty much. You may find this funny; skip to 13:30



it is quite odd that Box Boy or any of the other charlatans in AE911Twoof refuse to talk about the Pentagon.
Click to expand...

I have only ever heard Gage mention it once, when he was asked directly by Chris Mohr (IIRC), and Gage very hesitantly said that there was no evidence of a plane crash there, but then quickly covered his ass by saying he had no expertise in that field.. da faq?

As Chris Mohr also pointed out to Gage of a couple of occasions, you cannot have 1/4th of a conspiracy.
 
Clayton Moore said:
I suggest you get some of those security videos that were confiscated shortly after the Pentagon "attack", over 40 or so, and publish them. Then tell us why they were confiscated, why they haven't been released, and how/why the agents were deployed so rapidly for such a mundane task with the entire still DC area in jeopardy?
Click to expand...

They have been released, Clayton, update your data. They were confiscated because that's what they do with evidence during an investigation.
 
Clayton Moore said:
There were 40 plus or so Pentagon area security videos on that link? I don't think so.
Click to expand...
Were the security videos that didn't point to the area confiscated? I don't think so. You've made that up.

And sorry CJ for this drift, I'll shut up now.
 
Last edited:
Clayton Moore said:
There were 40 plus or so Pentagon area security videos on that link? I don't think so.
Click to expand...

The guy running that website says he has the DVDs. You can contact him, and if there really are more do a FOIA request. I know that takes work, and apparently there could be an allergy to that involved. If you try real hard, you can get your question answered though and not waste everyone's time. Unless that is the goal, here.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom