No way, they would dish out pharma drugs...
And further more, I was under their care back in 2016 when I could not walk or even stand and had to be taken on gurney and they took me to UCLA, and for 2.5 months I was in fear that I would not walk and finally they did a MRI and found a blasted knee infection...2.5 months before they went to an MRI...altogether I was under their POOR CARE for 4.5 months and when they finally found the infection, then 2.5 months of abx IV and they chose to do a clean out of knee and I believe it made it all worse, any collagen in the knee they cleaned it out...Now I'm taking an Alternative collagen product and working to get some collagen back and my trusty walker since the UCLA saga....NO, I hope I never beckon those doors again..
So let's unpack this.
You were so sick that you had to be taken to hospital on a gurney, i.e. by ambulance. So in what way is that the fault of the hospital? You were sick before you even got there.
From the sounds of it, this was a last resort effort. You were SO sick that you had to be dragged there. Thus whatever you were taking beforehand simply didn't work. Your condition was very poor, which is why it took so long to get it dealt with.
I also find it VERY hard to believe it took a hospital more than 8 weeks to find an infection. That sort of thing shows up in simple, rapid blood tests, which would have been the first thing they did. Some follow-ups would have been needed to locate the infection, which may have taken a few days.
However deep-seated, well-established infections do take time to deal with. These sorts of infections happen when patients refuse to be treated as soon as they get symptoms, and let the problem (literally) fester. These are more common among indigents and homeless without medical insurance, who cannot afford treatment. Health deniers, however, are worse. They COULD be treated but stubbornly won't. Until their problem is a long, long way down the track and has caused significant and irreparable physical damage...sound familiar?
A "clean-out of the knee cartilage" is necessary only for extensive joint damage such as from car accidents or sports injuries, or due to long-term, deep-seated, untreated infections. I don't
think you are a pro-footballer...
"Alternative collagen", if it contains collagen, is collagen. Like "organic salt" is still sodium chloride. The difference is only the price.
And now you are on a "trusty walker". Which says your knee no longer supports free walking. And you say you persist with your holistic regime. This says it has done nothing - it has not made you better. The only thing that has made any progress for you has been the surgery.
I do just great with my holistic food based supplements and want no part of more pharma toxic drugs.
How do you know if your "holistic food based supplements" are toxic or not? I suggest being very careful what you take. Most of them are completely unregulated, and some of them are deadly. In short, they are unregulated drugs.
My first major downfall was a hip replacement at St. Johns, maybe I should have chosen UCLA, but so many lessons learned from this hard hard surgery and the aftermath with all the damage done to my body.
How was your mobility and condition
before your hip replacement? I take it that wasn't a cosmetic procedure but necessary? If it was worse before the surgery, it looks like you are complaining that they improved your condition.
And for sure surgery can't be undone.
Amputations can't be undone. But hip surgery certainly can be repeated. It frequently is. But I'm interested where you got your degree in medicine and surgery so you are so sure about this.
And for sure plain and simple: Negligence on UCLA, when not in the hospital, in 3 rehabs, so gone from home a total of 4.5 monts.
So sue them for negligence. It's truly the American way. Good luck.