• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

All things Trump + Russia Part 4

Bubba said:
Steady now Laddies.

Remain calm.

Ignore the sworn statements of McCabe, Rice, Clapper, just released.

Just keep watching old footage of them constantly on friendly media claiming conclusive evidence POTUS is a Russian pawn.

Repeat.

Again Lads, DONT look at their sworn statements, and dont listen to kooks claiming Clapper, Rice, etc all swore under oath that they never saw any evidence of collusion.

We will get through this !

Dont look!


Click to expand...

Do you have another source besides a Trump-friendly tabloid that will provide these alleged statements in full context?
 
Last edited:
Bubba said:
Steady now Laddies.

Remain calm.

Ignore the sworn statements of McCabe, Rice, Clapper, just released.

Just keep watching old footage of them constantly on friendly media claiming conclusive evidence POTUS is a Russian pawn.

Repeat.

Again Lads, DONT look at their sworn statements, and dont listen to kooks claiming Clapper, Rice, etc all swore under oath that they never saw any evidence of collusion.

We will get through this !

Dont look!


Click to expand...

No, if you read closely it says they were asked whether they had personally seen direct evidence that Trump and Putin were conspiring, and they said no. They based their public statements on the same facts that were available to all of us, including Trump's open praise and affection for Putin, his son's secret meeting with someone who claimed to represent the Russian government, and Trump's known questionable financial dealings with Russian sources. They made the distinction between what they suspected and what they could prove. No contradiction there.
 
Mmm. Looks like Flynn didn't quite get a get out of jail free card yet.

A U.S. judge put on hold the Justice Department’s move to drop charges against Michael Flynn, saying he expects independent groups and legal experts to argue against the bid to exonerate President Trump’s former national security adviser of lying to the FBI.

U.S. District Judge Emmet G. Sullivan said in an order Tuesday that he expects individuals and organizations will seek to intervene in the politically charged case. Having others weigh in could preface more aggressive steps that the federal judge in Washington could take, including — as many outside observers have called for — holding a hearing to consider what to do.
Click to expand...
 
johnny karate said:
Do you have another source besides a Trump-friendly tabloid that will provide these alleged statements in full context?
Click to expand...

Are you sure that "friendly" adequately describes the level of bias that they demonstrate? I think that that is probably far, far too weak, personally. As for trustworthiness, well, it's a tabloid.
 
Squeegee Beckenheim said:
Last night, Trump tweeted, or re-tweeted 50 times about the Russia investigation
Click to expand...

Captain_Swoop said:
He's been retweeting calls for obama to be arrested, charged with treason and sent to Gitmo.
Click to expand...

Stacyhs said:
I've never seen anyone so intent on revealing himself as insecure, jealous and petty as Trump. I have to admit he is definitely the best at it I've ever seen.
Click to expand...


But Obama is the one who has been making "uncalled for" statements (in private) and acting insufficiently presidential.

Just ask McConnell.
 
Trebuchet said:
No rational person would want to bring up the whole Russia thing again. It won't go well for him. But he can't help himself and needs a distraction from Covid-19.
Click to expand...
Actually I think that because it is a distraction from covid 19 that it might work.

Trump's feeble-minded supporters are convinced he did nothing wrong with russia because it didn't affect them personally (and they don't care if they lose democracy if they can still get guns). But Covid19 does affect them personally... Even the dumbest can see the health and economic impact.

Trying to remind everyone about Russia won't win him new supporters but might slow the loss of existing ones.

Sent from my LM-X320 using Tapatalk
 
quadraginta said:
But Obama is the one who has been making "uncalled for" statements (in private) and acting insufficiently presidential.

Just ask McConnell.
Click to expand...

They are so childish. To them, Trump always blaming and criticizing Obama is just fine, but Obama is never supposed to say anything to criticize Trump...

The GOP is a criminal organization and cult populated by adult toddlers.
 
quadraginta said:
But Obama is the one who has been making "uncalled for" statements (in private) and acting insufficiently presidential.

Just ask McConnell.
Click to expand...
I'm very, very, very certain Mr. McConnell will grasp his pearl choker with his talons until they fracture from the stress once the current occupier vacates the Oval Office and, rare though it no doubt will be, offers a tweet of modest criticism of his successor.
 
Segnosaur said:
Actually I think that because it is a distraction from covid 19 that it might work.

Trump's feeble-minded supporters are convinced he did nothing wrong with russia because it didn't affect them personally (and they don't care if they lose democracy if they can still get guns). But Covid19 does affect them personally... Even the dumbest can see the health and economic impact.

Trying to remind everyone about Russia won't win him new supporters but might slow the loss of existing ones.

Sent from my LM-X320 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

Good point.
 
Yeah, I agree. I was just sarcastically highlighting the gulf between what subpoenas mean when issued against this administration and what they mean when issued by this administration.
 
If there's now occurring any "crumbling", it's because the previously uncovered illegality by a non-partisan Special Counsel is being undermined by a compliant Attorney General acting more like Trump's personal lawyer.
 
Oh noes! Trump administration declassifies full Susan Rice email sent on Inauguration Day

The email describes a Jan. 5, 2017, Oval Office meeting about Michael Flynn and Russian interference in the 2016 election.

It's full of damning evidence like...

The email, which memorialized the meeting two weeks after it happened, said Obama wanted to be sure “every aspect of this issue is handled by the Intelligence and law enforcement communities ‘by the book.’”

“The president stressed that he is not asking about, initiating or instructing anything from a law enforcement perspective,” the email continued. “He reiterated that our law enforcement team needs to proceed as it normally would by the book.”

The newly declassified portion describes Comey’s response.

“Director Comey affirmed that he is proceeding ‘by the book’ as it relates to law enforcement,” Rice wrote. “From a national security perspective, Comey said he does have some concerns that incoming NSA Flynn is speaking frequently with Russian Ambassador Kislyak. Comey said that could be an issue as it relates to sharing sensitive information. President Obama asked if Comey was saying that the NSC should not pass sensitive information related to Russia to Flynn. Comey replied ‘potentially.’ He added that he has no indication thus far that Flynn has passed classified information to Kislyak, but he noted that ‘the level of communication is unusual.’ The President asked Comey to inform him if anything changes in the next few weeks that should affect how we share classified information with the incoming team. Comey said that he would.”
Click to expand...

Wanting everything done specifically "by the book," without political interference from the Obama Administration, and being wary about potential security threats? Such a scandal! Obamagate!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom