• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Cont: All things Trump + Russia Part 3

Status
Not open for further replies.
logger said:
So hopefully we’ll get the facts of their conclusion by Fall. :rolleyes:

I wonder if they’ll release before or after the election?
Click to expand...

Do you accept their statement? Even though it contradicts the conclusion of the Congressional Intelligence Committee Republicans?
 
The Seychelles meeting is back in the news.

A Russian plane linked to the country's government flew into the Seychelles the day prior to a 2017 meeting now under review by Special Counsel Robert Mueller, according to the airport flight data obtained by NJ Advance Media.

Mueller's team is examining a series of meetings that took place in the Seychelles, an archipelago in the Indian Ocean, as part of its broader investigation into Russian meddling in the 2016 presidential election.

Much speculation has centered on one particular meeting that took place between Erik Prince, founder of the security company Blackwater, Kirill Dmitriev, the director of one of Russia's sovereign wealth funds, and Crown Prince Mohammed Bin Zayed Al-Nahyan, the effective ruler of the United Arab Emirates (also known as "MBZ").

Few details have emerged about the contents of the meetings. Last year, the Washington Post described this meeting in its reporting as an attempt by the U.S. to set up a backchannel with Russia. Prince, in a testimony with the House Intelligence Committee in December, described his meeting on the island as a chance encounter.
Click to expand...
 
"Your honor, my client cannot be charged with murder because, while stabbing the victim, at no point did he specifically utter the word 'murder'".
 
https://twitter.com/kylegriffin1/status/998934210084835329

DHS Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen says that she hasn't seen the Intelligence Community's specific judgment that Russia interfered in the 2016 election to help Trump win the White House.

"I do not believe that I have seen that conclusion."
Click to expand...

https://twitter.com/kylegriffin1/status/998935323152474113

Less than a week ago, the Senate Intelligence Committee said they agreed with the IC’s assessment that the Russians were trying to get Trump elected.

But the Secretary of Homeland Security now says she still hasn’t seen that judgement.
Click to expand...
 
Squeegee Beckenheim said:
https://twitter.com/kylegriffin1/status/998934210084835329

DHS Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen says that she hasn't seen the Intelligence Community's specific judgment that Russia interfered in the 2016 election to help Trump win the White House.

"I do not believe that I have seen that conclusion."
Click to expand...

https://twitter.com/kylegriffin1/status/998935323152474113

Less than a week ago, the Senate Intelligence Committee said they agreed with the IC’s assessment that the Russians were trying to get Trump elected.

But the Secretary of Homeland Security now says she still hasn’t seen that judgement.
Click to expand...
Click to expand...


Maybe her eyes were closed?

Maybe she didn't look?

"None so blind ...", etc., etc..

Certainly she couldn't have been telling a fib. It is well known that no one in the Trump administration would ever do such a thing.
 
Last edited:
logger said:
Lol, wow

Wait till the Trump FBI/DOJ put an informant in the Joe Biden campaign.
Click to expand...

Why?
Does the FBI has solid evidence his campaign is in contact with the Russians?
Because if they do, then they should do exactly that.
 
beren said:
Why?
Does the FBI has solid evidence his campaign is in contact with the Russians?
Because if they do, then they should do exactly that.
Click to expand...

Because it illustrates what corrupt intelligence people can do. And no, they would have the same made up intelligence as the current corrupt officials.
 
logger said:
Because it illustrates what corrupt intelligence people can do. And no, they would have the same made up intelligence as the current corrupt officials.
Click to expand...

Evidence that the intelligence is made up?

And yes that is a serious question.
 
beren said:
Evidence that the intelligence is made up?

And yes that is a serious question.
Click to expand...

A dossier that was paid for by the DNC?

Papa and Paige were set up by an informant working for the FBI?

FISA applications that were gotten under dubious circumstances?

The whole top leadership of the FBI gone. Fired, demoted or kept in place to answer questions?

It’s quite a mess. Wire tapping and spying on the opposition candidate then setting up an investigation is the worst we’ve ever seen in this country.
 
logger said:
A dossier that was paid for by the DNC?
Click to expand...

Of which much was independently verified.

Papa and Paige were set up by an informant working for the FBI?
Click to expand...

And have admitted to numerous counts of wrongdoing outside the alleged setup.

FISA applications that were gotten under dubious circumstances?
Click to expand...

Which went through the approval process multiple times, and the dubious nature of the circumstances is yet to be evidenced.

The whole top leadership of the FBI gone. Fired, demoted or kept in place to answer questions?
Click to expand...

You forgot to add "by the same people who were being investigated by them, and in many cases who appointed those leaders".

It’s quite a mess. Wire tapping and spying on the opposition candidate then setting up an investigation is the worst we’ve ever seen in this country.
Click to expand...

Facts? Who needs 'em?! You can prove anything that's even remotely true with facts!
 
logger said:
A dossier that was paid for by the DNC?
Click to expand...
Not strictly true, but also no evidence of fakery.

Papa and Paige were set up by an informant working for the FBI?
Click to expand...
Please provide evidence of this and substantiate that it is evidence of fakery.

FISA applications that were gotten under dubious circumstances?
Click to expand...
Please provide evidence that it was dubious. I have seen plenty to suggest it wasn't, and none to suggest it was.

The whole top leadership of the FBI gone. Fired, demoted or kept in place to answer questions?
Click to expand...
Evidence that Trump is corrupt, but not of fakery.

]It’s quite a mess. Wire tapping and spying on the opposition candidate then setting up an investigation is the worst we’ve ever seen in this country.
Click to expand...
Evidence that any of this happened?




In summary: you made a bunch of claims, most of which I believe to be false. None of them are evidence of fakery. Most of them aren't evidence of anything since they are bare assertions.

I am willing to peruse any EVIDENCE you can provide. Got any?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom