• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Cont: All things Trump + Russia Part 2

Status
Not open for further replies.
Childlike Empress said:
Of great use to a development of accurate understanding of reality for you would be to drop the naive notion that there are "unbiased" journalistic sources. What's important is transparency, and that's why a source called "conservative treehouse" or "world socialist web site" is preferable in principle (if their research is solid) to one that pretends to be fair and balanced, first and foremost the "papers of record" which are anything but that.
Click to expand...

There's a difference between having a political slant and regurgitating partisan propaganda, as I suspect you know.
 
Childlike Empress said:
Oh, and Squeegee, the "illegal" claim is in the first sentence of the first point in the letter. They just call it "unlawful". Maybe I should accuse you of disinformation now? Or did you just lie to yourself again?
Click to expand...

The letter says that the GSA's actions were "unlawful", not Mueller's. But that doesn't cast Mueller's investigation in the same bad light, does it?
 
Childlike Empress said:
Of great use to a development of accurate understanding of reality for you would be to drop the naive notion that there are "unbiased" journalistic sources.
Click to expand...
You might benefit from accepting that there is an objective reality available for all of us to observe and, indeed, absorb and inwardly digest.

Your "sources" universally fly in the face of it, and make you appear to be nothing more than a conduit.
 
Squeegee Beckenheim said:
The letter says that the GSA's actions were "unlawful", not Mueller's. But that doesn't cast Mueller's investigation in the same bad light, does it?
Click to expand...

It's doubtful as well that the GSA's actions were unlawful. If there was any legal reason anywhere in the chain Trump's lawyers would have filed a motion. Instead in all of Trumplandistan the little creatures are working on manipulating the believers.
 
@ferd burfle :

It doesn’t need to make sense. Anything that promotes FUD makes Vladimir smile.
Click to expand...
Not if it promotes it at home. Putin's whole schtick is that with him in charge everything's under control (and Russia is great again).
 
Skeptic Ginger said:
It's doubtful as well that the GSA's actions were unlawful. If there was any legal reason anywhere in the chain Trump's lawyers would have filed a motion. Instead in all of Trumplandistan the little creatures are working on manipulating the believers.
Click to expand...
It also flies in the face of reality that Mueller would have taken the emails without following legal procedures scrupulously. He'd rather not have them otherwise, since that would poison the whole enquiry.

In reality it's as simple as has been said here so often : use a .gov account and the likes of Mueller can get a look at what you say. And it seems that some people did.
 
TheL8Elvis said:
Childlike Empress said:
Essentially I couldn't care less. Again, this isn't about the Mueller investigation's "bias" (that's what the Washington Pest pre$$titutes want you to believe - real journalism LOL), it is about how it came into being in the first place.
Click to expand...

Can you define what "real Journalism" is for the class ?
Click to expand...

I'll take that as a a resounding "no".

Color me surprised.:rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
Derail into whether objective reality" exists moved to AAH. If you want to discuss such matters please do so in the appropriate section of the Forum.
Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: Darat
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom