The Atheist, what would you say is the defining characteristic of modernity that causes you to expect that it would not include polygamy?
Well, that's my point. There are real issues that need dealing with, and focussing needlessly on how many wives the President has detracts from that. Why is having more than one wife objectively any worse than only having one? Why do people get married at all? I sure as hell don't know. Surely it's all just an artifact of one's culture? How does it affect you or me in the slightest?
But I'm also pissed at the fatalist attitude so many people take towards my country in particular, when clearly the whole world is going to hell in a handbasket. Our money is based on oil, and the oil is running out. I'm glad I live in a country which doesn't feel compelled to go to war over that just yet, and which has been making oil from coal for the last forty-odd years.
By the way, a hell of a lot of people are coming back now that they've lost their jobs overseas.
Lol, not behaviour one expects from a modern nation".
Sorry to inform you, but your racism is showing.
whites are only 14% of the roll
As I said in the other thread...
Your cultural bias is showing. Why should anyone care how many wives he chooses to inflict upon himself?
We have real problems to deal with. Let's focus on those.
Besides, it's not like great leaders of the free world are so much better. I'd still rather have Zuma than Berlusconi.
Lol, "not behaviour one expects from a modern nation".
Sorry to inform you, but your racism is showing.
By number or by volume?
I will reply the same way
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?postid=5487758#post5487758
as in the thread I started on the same subject
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=163970
Perhaps you should ask a mod to merge the two threads?I will reply the same way
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?postid=5487758#post5487758
as in the thread I started on the same subject
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=163970
The oil from coal is a legacy of Apartheid.
Why are so many whites & coloureds leaving then?
"Coloureds" is what the non-white, non-africans call themselves. Or am I misinterpreting your "ugh"?Ugh.
"Coloureds" is what the non-white, non-africans call themselves.
What do you mean it shouldn't matter?That shouldn't matter. Horrible word. Ugh.
The term Coloured is also used to describe persons of mixed race in Namibia, to refer to those of part Khoisan, part white descent. The Basters of Namibia constitute a separate ethnic group that are sometimes considered a sub-group of the Coloured population of that country. Under South African rule, the policies and laws of apartheid were extended to what was then called South West Africa, and the treatment of Namibian Coloureds was comparable to that of South African Coloureds.
The term Coloured or 'Goffal' is also used in Zimbabwe, where, unlike South Africa and Namibia, most people of mixed race have African and European ancestry, being descended from the offspring of European men and Shona and Ndebele women; under white minority rule in the then Rhodesia, Coloureds had more privileges than black Africans, including full voting rights, but still faced serious discrimination. In Swaziland, the term Coloured is also used.
What's up with those backwards n***ers and their multiple wives, right you guys?