Actually, several of your fellow posters are "denying that the radar data is said to end at 1000ft." They typically claim it ends at 2000ft.
Your make your assertion that the graph does not match the videos, both graphs end well above the videos start point so show no conflict. That is a fact.
NTSB did not include the 1000ft data on the graph. so its its not a valid data point (you also need a time for the 1000ft point in order to be able to plot it.)
Some come all the way down to 1500ft.
That was me, based on that laughable Truthers video. It too ends way above the point the videos start. So no conflict.
There exists, for them, an important cut-off point, otherwise it becomes too painfully obvious that the ALL43 video, you know, the subject matter of this thread, show shadow thingy imagery that is inconsistent with the radar data at 1000ft. Thus, the importance of shutting off the radar above the 1000ft level.
Feel free to find the data for 1000ft, you need to know the time that height was reached.
That point has been firmly established now for well over ten pages of this thread. It might even be a tad difficult to retrace the process whereby the radar data and the ALL43 videos mutually contradict one another, thereby falsifying BOTH data sources, but it's all in this thread.
Indeed you proved there was no conflict at all between the Radar data and the videos. I further showed that flightpath angle was such that it was well within aircraft capabilities and no dramatic pull out was required.
I am very pleased to be able to say that, by the way.
If looking like a fool makes you feel cool, go for it.
You may continue to believe whatever it is you believe for as long as you can believe, whatever it is.
I believe things based on evidence. Plane hit the towers.
No. Your claim is false. I make my claims and you make yours. You are not in a privileged position relative to 9/11. What happened on 9/11 has not ever been demonstrated with anything like proper forensic technique, let alone trustworthy investigatory outcomes.
To sane people it is the most proved event in world history.
That may be the major ASSUMPTION that simply has to be pointed out to people such as yourself for howsoever long it takes; namely:
What happened on 9/11 has not ever been properly demonstrated, proven or shown. The common storyline of 9/11 is just that; a storyline that is supported by propaganda, psyop tactics and jingoism.
Yet you can't show a single piece of evidence that would make anyone but a particularly ill educated fool think so.
You are not a jury of anything. You are a person making claims.
This is your thread! you made the claims on post one. I as a reader find you have failed to present even a vaguely plausible case for what you assert.
To the extent you claim adherence to the common storyline of 9/11, you are making claims that not only have not been proven, but which, in addition, rely on elements of proof that are plainly false. Like, for instance, the ALL43 videos and the alleged radar data, about which the statement "is it exercise or is it real world" has not ever been resolved.
please show us your proof then, you make the assertion, you provide the evidence.
You have not got any proof of the common storyline of 9/11 that is reliable and I here dare say that you will not even try to prove otherwise; and, more importantly, if you do, you will fail and fail miserably, just as those who claimed there are "1000s of witnesses" failed and failed miserably to prove that claim.
I see you are not familiar with how courts and proof works. There is way more than enough evidence to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that planes hit the towers.
By the way, all of those failures of proof of the common storyline of 9/11 are exemplified in this thread.
Nope, all the videos show planes hitting the towers, the original hi res footage even more so. You have presented no plausible way that any let alone all the footage could have been faked. If even only one of them was real it is incontrovertible evidence that a plane hit the south Tower.
