What? Folk picked him up on details he didn't understand? Folk resorted to mockery and ridicule? I'm shocked! Shocked, I tell you!
Well, what did you expect? You messed with an electrickly engineerical!
What? Folk picked him up on details he didn't understand? Folk resorted to mockery and ridicule? I'm shocked! Shocked, I tell you!
That last post of cjdelphi's seems a little out of control. Rambling sentences that hardly even bothered with punctuation. Hope we didn't upset the little feller? by persisting in asking for actual evidence.
All these pages because there was a power-outage, a weird sound, and a light he can't explain which somehow proves this was an extraterrestrial encounter.
But this is somehow different than when people with equally mundane video footage claim encounters with ghosts, or angels, or other kinds of woo.
No additional photographs of the location. No video footage of attempts to recreate the footage, even if only to try to support the claims.
Nothing changes.
...This is just one huge orgy, metaphorically speaking
And as usual, I never get invited to these things.
Yeah. I'm kinda kicking myself I didn't follow the link.He actually linked to it.
![]()
Woo never changes.
I would have thought that having a power outage every time someone tries to drive their car would be kind of inconvenient.
My favourite was the responses the OP got on Eletrician Talk.
This idea has come up a couple of times in the thread and this is a slightly worse version of it.I would have thought that the staggering amount of ionizing particle radiation produced by any sort of ionic reaction engine adequate to move vehicles around near the surface of the earth would be even more inconvenient.
Am I the only one who mentally “heard” that like the opening lines in the Fallout games?
“Woo. Woo never changes.”
Sent from my volcanic island lair using carrier pigeon.
There is no need for the downdraft of an ion engine to be any more dangerous than the downdraft of a helicopter of the same size.
However, the downdraft of a helicopter the size of a vehicle capable of travelling between Earth orbit and the surface and returning would probably be pretty noticeable for anyone directly underneath it.
My favourite was the responses the OP got on Eletrician Talk.
I never really understood his insistence on the “ion drive” thing. An ion drive works by hurling ions out at great speed, in a collimated beam, to provide thrust. If a spaceship is hovering over the ground using an ion drive, it’s throwing out enough ions to provide thrust equal to its weight. That’s literally what a rocket is.
Rockets can use compressed nitrogen, water (like the fun pump-up water rocket toys), combustion products (i.e., the vast majority of rockets), charged particles (like ion drives), plasma (like VASIMR), or anything else that throws stuff in the opposite of the direction you want to go. If you mount Ma Deuce in the back of your spaceship and pull the trigger, you would have the Fifty Caliber Machine Gun Drive.
Ion drives are low-thrust and high-efficiency by nature, and are excellent for interplanetary applications that can accommodate leisurely maneuvers. You could build something to let you maneuver down near the ground, but it would be as inconspicuous as Thor whirling Mjolnir to smite his homicidal elder sister. And it would make a mess of anything it was hovering over.
That’s the inescapable physical nature of how it works. Ion drives aren’t magic, which is why I suggested to the OP that he invoke something like antigravity, which could accommodate his observations rather than contradict them. But he wasn’t willing to learn. Pity.
Do you think he mighht have started to get the message that he is talking a load of old bollocks?