Alien Visitation Contact Proof

[Olmstead]

As for your first paragraph, yes that is exactly my point in my response just a few comments up...the OP said it was an xiaomi webcam (not sure the exact model) and it is most definitely digital and fairly inexpensive, which means that you are correct it is most likely fully automatic. Your point about WB is. correct, and in addition, the ISO is also fully AUTO. Which means that as it becomes darker abruptly during the outage, the camera is gonna struggle to adjust its settings, resulting in both potential changes in color (from WB) and exposure (from auto ISO) totally normal stuff but misleading if you are trying to use the results as evidence of anything unusual.

That was my thinking as well. Something flashing in the distance at that point is a little too convoluted for my taste, although it could happen.

Completely debunking the video requires an expert in optics, an expert in video surveillance equipment, and an expert in electrical engineering, but it only takes one deluded maniac to "prove" it is aliens. An annoying feature of such claims.

But the people in the thread have done a pretty good job of explaining all of the phenomena.

 

[cjdelphi]

I would have thought that having a power outage every time someone tries to drive their car would be kind of inconvenient.

Why would you use an ion drive in a car?

Do you get planes flying over you daily like 100ft high? No cars wouldn't use an ion drive a craft would and any craft flying low enough to cause the power to drop out is flying dangerously

Do I need to explain everything?

 

[cjdelphi]

That was my thinking as well. Something flashing in the distance at that point is a little too convoluted for my taste, although it could happen.

Completely debunking the video requires an expert in optics, an expert in video surveillance equipment, and an expert in electrical engineering, but it only takes one deluded maniac to "prove" it is aliens. An annoying feature of such claims.

But the people in the thread have done a pretty good job of explaining all of the phenomena.

I've done a better job disproving their theories, yet here we are still! And the fact you think we need an optical expert is the only thing that you said that is correct

 

[Mojo]

Why would you use an ion drive in a car?

I’ve no idea, but you brought up petrol engines in cars being banned as a reason for using ion drives instead:

Petrol cars will be banned in 2035 to 2055 in most western countries because they use fossil fuels, if ion drives tick all the green boxes that's what will be used and an ion drive will take the power out, an ion drive might be the only legally allowed way to travel one day like petrol is going to get banned here

But all this is kind of off-topic, because things that might happen in the future aren’t evidence for anything until they happen, and even if the use of ion drives did become commonplace at some point in the future it wouldn’t be evidence for your aliens. An expert in logic should know this.

 

[Olmstead]

I've done a better job disproving their theories, yet here we are still! And the fact you think we need an optical expert is the only thing that you said that is correct

Hush now, the adults are talking. You go back to writing your bad science fiction novel, while we discuss some science.

 

[Pixel42]

It's hard to a reply to someone who's only intent is to ridicule you

It's hard to reply to someone who's only intent is to cling to a belief in which they are heavily emotionally invested but cannot support with objective evidence or reasonable argument.

If your claim is being ridiculed you should at least consider the possibility it's because it's ridiculous.

 

[Craig4]

It is, why you sounding paranoid?

Interesting. And how does that make you feel?

 

[Craig4]

It's hard to a reply to someone who's only intent is to ridicule you
It wasn't a light I think we perceive it as light and if you only clean power source is a fusion drive the pumping that energy into ionic wind to get around cleanly and silently makes complete sense

Petrol cars will be banned in 2035 to 2055 in most western countries because they use fossil fuels, if ion drives tick all the green boxes that's what will be used and an ion drive will take the power out, an ion drive might be the only legally allowed way to travel one day like petrol is going to get banned here

If only ion drives are allowed to fly with mini fusion reactors then that's all that gets manufactured

Time is on my side ..

But that's all your "work" is good enough for.

 

[Craig4]

I've done a better job disproving their theories, yet here we are still! And the fact you think we need an optical expert is the only thing that you said that is correct

Bravo. You've earned even more microwavable pizza rolls.

 

[Jack by the hedge]

Show me a bat or transformer lighting up a path and not the entire street, ridiculous theory
...

It doubtlessly did light up the whole street. It just wasn't your street, it was one street over.

https://youtu.be/_B7q_ZDL2YU

Anyone with a better theory, contact me ...

Your latest video is a loop of the moment the power tries and fails to reconnect and it perfectly well illustrates the flash of the fault still being present, 250 feet in front the camera, directly behind the house opposite. The flash lights up the tops of the trees while your street remains in shadow. Indirect light from the glow in the trees is seen on the car and the path on the right.


Here's how close the transformer pole is to your street. 250 feet in front of your camera. You would have a direct view of it except the house opposite you is right in the way.



The three phase power lines only come halfway up your street. That transformer is as close to you as they are. It's the only local one I could find using Streetview. You seem to have fixated on the notion that the power line fault must have happened in your own street. I can't see any good reason to assume that. I can see that both streets' power lines join each other at the street corners and are directly bonded together. Your street's overhead power lines join others which run right to the transformer pole.

 

[cjdelphi]

It doubtlessly did light up the whole street. It just wasn't your street, it was one street over.



Your latest video is a loop of the moment the power tries and fails to reconnect and it perfectly well illustrates the flash of the fault still being present, 250 feet in front the camera, directly behind the house opposite. The flash lights up the tops of the trees while your street remains in shadow. Indirect light from the glow in the trees is seen on the car and the path on the right.


Here's how close the transformer pole is to your street. 250 feet in front of your camera. You would have a direct view of it except the house opposite you is right in the way.

[qimg]http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/imagehosting/thum_3561962f8c195df7d1.jpg[/qimg]

The three phase power lines only come halfway up your street. That transformer is as close to you as they are. It's the only local one I could find using Streetview. You seem to have fixated on the notion that the power line fault must have happened in your own street. I can't see any good reason to assume that. I can see that both streets' power lines join each other at the street corners and are directly bonded together. Your street's overhead power lines join others which run right to the transformer pole.

I can see you're forever going to explain this as a natural source even though a transformer and bat can't be responsible

I regress, until an optical expert arrives to confirm my theory, transformer lol too funny a light quarter of a km.away lighting up my path without the tree lol too funny

I'll wait for an expert....

 

[Craig4]

I can see you're forever going to explain this as a natural source even though a transformer and bat can't be responsible

I regress, until an optical expert arrives to confirm my theory, transformer lol too funny a light quarter of a km.away lighting up my path without the tree lol too funny

I'll wait for an expert....

This is why you fail.

Well, it's one of several reasons but the highlighted is a large tile in a complex mosaic of failure.

 

[MBDK]

This is why you fail.

I must add to that list this fact: No examination of evidence can truly be accurate unless you pay attention to detail, which our imagineer also fails at. Unless they are completely incompetent, their failure to recognize 250 feet is NOT 1/4 of a kilometer, would be such an example.

 

[Steve]

I must add to that list this fact: No examination of evidence can truly be accurate unless you pay attention to detail, which our imagineer also fails at. Unless they are completely incompetent, their failure to recognize 250 feet is NOT 1/4 of a kilometer, would be such an example.

But it is a quarter of a kilofoot, and that is what really matters .

 

[Mojo]

I must add to that list this fact: No examination of evidence can truly be accurate unless you pay attention to detail, which our imagineer also fails at. Unless they are completely incompetent, their failure to recognize 250 feet is NOT 1/4 of a kilometer, would be such an example.

As would not realising that light can travel that far, or that it travels in straight lines.

 

[Jack by the hedge]

I can see you're forever going to explain this as a natural source even though a transformer and bat can't be responsible

I see you're forever going to run away from the explanation the power company already handed you on a plate, and you're going to make absolutely no effort to confirm or refute it except to declare it impossible for reasons you won't describe. We know Adelaide gets scores of these power cuts caused by bats every year.

I regress, until an optical expert arrives to confirm my theory, transformer lol too funny a light quarter of a km.away lighting up my path without the tree lol too funny

I'll wait for an expert....

Regress? Okay, whatever. But 250 feet is 76 metres away. With your usual lack of attention to detail you think that's "quarter of a km.away" i.e. 250 metres. That would be 820 feet.

I even gave you a map of your own neighbourhood and drew a line to the transformer in the very next street over.

Yes, on reflection, maybe you had better wait for an expert. I only seem able to lead this horse to water.

 

[Jack by the hedge]

I even gave you a map of your own neighbourhood and drew a line to the transformer in the very next street over.

Okay, an aerial photo rather than a map. And maybe it's hard to see details on your phone. But for goodness sake it's your own neighbourhood. You don't even need to use Google maps; you can step outside and actually look at it.

You really don't have any excuse for not getting what happened here beyond a stubborn determination not to get it.

 

[Gord_in_Toronto]

I see the question I asked here: http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=13878029&postcount=1131 has gone unanswered.

If a bat had momentarily shorted out a high voltage transformer, how much evidence do you think you could see from the ground? You could not even recognize a picture of a bird at that distance.

 

[bruto]

I stepped out on the back porch last night, and the LED bug light was making almost exactly the same sound as recorded here. OMIGOD! they've landed here now!

 

[Mojo]

I see the question I asked here: http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=13878029&postcount=1131 has gone unanswered.

If a bat had momentarily shorted out a high voltage transformer, how much evidence do you think you could see from the ground? You could not even recognize a picture of a bird at that distance.

He still hasn’t really said what a Search Beam^TM is either, although he’s modified it to a “a transportation beam of some kind”, presumably because a “search beam” would be difficult to define in a way that would distinguish it from a searchlight.

So, cjdelphi, what did the “beam” in your video transport?