I was listening to the 2007 Gage/Craig debate on the Syrett show this am, and thought I'd mention a couple more instances where Gage exposes himself as a deceptive fraud:
Richard Gage 17:38 'if you wanted the buildngs to come down and blame it on fire , which is not explosive in nature, you would use a different type of charge. You would use an incendiary to cut the beams; you would not use explosives which would give away your project. Thermite is a high-tech incendiary which is used by the military to cut thru steel like a hot knife thru butter'
But he had just argued that, due to the pulverization of materials, an unnatural collapse had occurred, and there was absolutely no way fire could have brought down the buildngs anyway. Presuming he is correct, any competent fire investigation would have determined this as well, so the hypothetical 'cover story' wouldn't have worked!He has already debunked his theory! This shows his arguments are not only based on faulty or false premises, they are internally inconsistent or contradictory.
Perhaps Gage is simply delusional, and not deliberately misleading. I really can't say, except that he's making a lot of false claims.
..20:30 'The firemen found tons of molten metal flowing like lava. The world Trade Centre structural engineer Leslie Robertson says it's flowing after 21 days. Still flowing, molten metal. And nobody knew where all this was coming from..
He later calls Robertson a 'viable witness' (22:20)
This is truly remarkable. Leslie Robertson is used as a witness to molten metal, and yet his core expertise is that he actually designed the WTC towers. Does Gage quote Robertson's expert opinion on the collapse of the towers? Absolutely not, because Robertson obviously knows that the towers collapsed due to fire, and thinks that the CD theory is 'preposterous.
Is it misleading and deceptive for Richard Gage to omit such important testimony? You bet it is.
This is very clear evidence that Gage intends to deceive his audiences. I can't claim to know what Gage is really trying to accomplish with these tactics, but uncovering the truth is clearly not the focus - there is another motivation at play.