So simple, a caveman could do it, apparently
My friend, it's so simple,
you could do it.
Let me paraphrase paul craig roberts. I quote:
Which is it? Paraphrase or quote? Nevermind...doesn't matter...
''In order to understand the improbability of the government’s explanation of 9/11, it is not necessary to know anything about what force or forces brought down the three World Trade Center buildings, what hit the Pentagon or caused the explosion, the flying skills or lack thereof of the alleged hijackers, whether the airliner crashed in Pennsylvania or was shot down, whether cell phone calls made at the altitudes could be received, or any other debated aspect of the controversy.
The highlight is your (and every other Truthers) #1 problem. It is critical that you have some sort of intelligence. Creating arguments out of personal ignorance is foolish.
I question your education on 9/11, as all I've seen from you to this point is personal incredulity and quotes from other Truthers circa 2006.
You only have to know two things.
I beg to differ.
One is that according to the official story, a handful of Arabs, mainly Saudi Arabians, operating independently of any government and competent intelligence service, men without James Bond and V for Vendetta capabilities, outwitted not only the CIA, FBI, and National Security Agency, but all 16 US intelligence agencies, along with all security agencies of America’s NATO allies and Israel’s Mossad.
There are literally millions of undocumented aliens in the USA...even today, 12 years
after 9/11. Are they all going by the name of Bond?
Why is 19 individuals slipping through the immigration and intelligence cracks such an impossibility?
Not only did the entire intelligence forces of the Western world fail, but on the morning of the attack the entire apparatus of the National Security State simultaneously failed. Airport security failed four times in one hour.
How so? Many of the hijackers were selected for additional screening, but they found no reason to hold them.
How so? NORAD does not watch the skies directly over the USA...they monitor the airspace beyond our borders. Clearly, you have no idea what NORAD does or did on 9/11.
Air Traffic Control failed.
How so? ATC response times to the hijackings were rather impressive considering the limited information they were receiving.
Their only failure was the inability to break the laws of time travel.
The National Security Council failed.
Huh?
Huh?
Absolutely nothing worked.
So far, you're very wrong.
The world’s only superpower was helpless at the humiliating mercy of a few undistinguished Arabs.
Unfortunately, this is the only true statement you've made so far. Yes, we got caught with our pants down. The hijackers exposed a weakness and, tragically, took advantage of it. I can tell you with a great degree of certainty that it won't happen again.
It is hard to image a more far-fetched story...
As opposed to your theory of...wait...what's your theory again?
...except for the second thing you need to know: The humiliating failure of US National Security did not result in immediate demands from the President of the United States, from Congress, from the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and from the media for an investigation of how such improbable total failure could have occurred.
Perhaps you missed the 911CR, NIST Reports, etc.?
No one was held accountable for the greatest failure of national security in world history. Instead, the White House dragged its feet for a year resisting any investigation until the persistent demands from 9/11 families for accountability forced President George W. Bush to appoint a political commission, devoid of any experts, to hold a pretend investigation.''
Bin Laden is dead. You can still save KSM if you hurry!
I'm not interested in being drawn into the CD argument. Its been done to death, and I'm not going to even dignify your exhausted and pathetic arguments with the thorough stoming they rightly deserve.
By "stoming" I believe you meant "stomping", but whatever. I'm sure your "thorough stomping" would no doubt contain a plethora of hand-picked quotes from a myriad of CT websites that haven't been updated since 2008. If your quality of work can be summed up by that blog you've touted here, I'm confident I have little to fear of being "stomped".
A false flag attack incorporating all the elements I personally ascribe to this event would only require somewhere in the neighborhood of 200 people, only a couple dozen of whom would have undisclosed knowledge of all the attack phases. Why is a conspiracy of 200 people (with the resources of an entire nation state at their disposal) so much more ridiculous than one involving 50 rag-tag muslims?
Only 200 you say? My theory only has 21. You have a ways to go.
??
.
?
