• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Adventures with AE911truth

Well, like MortFurd I don't live in the US, and I can assure you that most people here consider the 9/11-CT utter BS.

I think many people get a wrong impression of the twoof movement here. As one who DOES live in America, I can assure you that the vast majority of people here also consider the 9-11-CT utter BS.

And, what is with this guy? He spouts nonsense like "the hijackers are still alive" without ever having learned that that has been debunked SO MANY TIMES already as previously shown above.

Twoof lite.
 
Last edited:
snip...
And, what is with this guy? He spouts nonsense like "the hijackers are still alive" without ever having learned that that has been debunked SO MANY TIMES already as previously shown above.

Twoof lite.

I have two working theories regarding CT posters who bring up old debunked information:
1. He/she wants to be a hero. They are told about the JREF, and how tough it is over here. Without reading the previous threads, they think this is the one piece of information that hasn't been brought up here. Since it is the one they have personally looked into the most, they believe that they can "save the day" and shut us up with it.

2. CTers think everyone has memory problems. They will post a statement of "fact," then dance around having to give actual proof about it until we grow weary of the subject. Then bring it up again, hoping no one remebers that they had no proof before, and will just accept it as fact.
 
Is it just me, or are the truthers coming here lately really Bush League, rehashing the long ago debunked tripe.

Swing (I cant believe I am saying this ;)) is perhaps the most up to date of the lot.

TAM:)
 
funny how none of the photos have changed on the most wanted list.

I've heard this claim over and over again from CTs and still have no idea how this is evidence of an inside job?

Are you saying that the FBI isn't involved?
Are you saying that the FBI is involved, and even though they know about the inside job, and have assisted in the cover-up, for some strange reason they aren't allowed to lie about Bin Laden on their most-wanted list?
Are you saying that the FBI is involved and simply forgot to put Bin Laden on the list?

Can you clarify this for us, Doug? How does Bin Laden's absence on the FBI's most-wanted list indicate an inside job?
 
Funny, has one single GODAM* truther bothered to ask the FBI or their PR people why this is the case, and if so, what was their response?

TAM:)
 
How does Bin Laden's absence on the FBI's most-wanted list indicate an inside job?
Bin Laden is on the FBI's Most Wanted List. He's been on it since 1999.


Usama Bin Laden is wanted in connection with the August 7, 1998, bombings of the United States Embassies in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, and Nairobi, Kenya. These attacks killed over 200 people. In addition, Bin Laden is a suspect in other terrorist attacks throughout the world.

SHOULD BE CONSIDERED ARMED AND DANGEROUS
That last line is kind of funny IMO.
 
Funny, has one single GODAM* truther bothered to ask the FBI or their PR people why this is the case, and if so, what was their response?

TAM:)

That was actually my next question...

Doug, you find it funny that the FBI does not specifically list Bin Laden as a suspect in the 9/11 attacks. Can you tell us the real reason that 9/11 isn't listed on Bin Laden's poster, and why you feel this is a lie?

Thanks.
 
Yes, if he is a CIA asset, as the truthers claim, than what difference to the NWO would it be if his wanted poster said - wanted for 9/11, or not...

TAM:)
 
I have two working theories regarding CT posters who bring up old debunked information:
1. He/she wants to be a hero. They are told about the JREF, and how tough it is over here. Without reading the previous threads, they think this is the one piece of information that hasn't been brought up here. Since it is the one they have personally looked into the most, they believe that they can "save the day" and shut us up with it.

I did this cartoon a while ago illustrating your point.

its-like-an-assembly-line-really.png
 
Kookbreaker:

You hit the nail on the proverbial head.

Well done.

TAM:)
 
Or, how about the towers collapsing from fire when its obvious from the video that towers 1 & 2 were blown up & wtc7 was a perfectly executed conventional controlled demolition (textbook example). You can see pieces being ejected outward and upward during towers 1 & 2 collapse. Fire doesn't do that.
Really? And what's your expertise and background which allows you to conclusively state that fire doesn't do that? I trust it's something more substantial than having watched Hollywood movies and TV shows.
 
As far as me being a Canadian Citizen, the reality is that we will all soon be citizens of the NAU, with virtually all the rights that humanity has fought for over the past 1000 years removed in secret. If they have their way you will not have the right of representation or the right of habeus corpus when arrested for a crime.
Really? The items being discussed under the North American Union include changes to the procedures for the administration of criminal law? I presume you can point out the relevant passage from any documentation?

I wasn't aware of any legislation being proposed in Parliament which advocated the doing away with of Canadian legal tender and its replacement with U.S. dollars. Might you point me to the relevant bill? I wasn't aware that any legislation was before Parliament which proposed the abolishment of the nation of Canada and the seeking of statehood inside the United States. Might you point me to the relevant bill?

The major piece of news that was on CBC Newsworld this afternoon was a press conference by Public Safety Minister Stockwell Day addressing the RCMP pension fund scandal. I didn't see anything about the elimination of Canadian currency or the dissolution of Canada... you'd think the CBC or CTV would consider either of these to be rather major news stories...
 
Umm, now that mininukes seems to be the fad again, I just like to run something by you guys to see if its correct.

Wasn't all research regarding mini-nukes banned in the US between 1993 and 2003? (I've read somewhere that the ban was lifted may 8th 2003 by Bush).

Oh and NAU? Whassat?

Cheers,
SLOB
 
Last edited:

Back
Top Bottom