angrysoba
Philosophile
OK, so let's look at rape.
(a) who calls this? Does a woman have to prove it was rape, because it can take over a year for a case to come to court, and then only something like 2% of rape complaints end in a conviction.
So what? If a woman is sexually assaulted we don't need a trial to determine that. Just as we don't need to know if the suspect was guilty in a murder case if we want to determine there was a murder. We have evidence of the crime. You are not, I hope, doubting that rape exists are you? That would be idiotic.
(b) does this include rape by a husband? Likewise, how does a woman prove rape, given the length of time it takes to charge and convict, if the man pleads not guilty.
Again, it is amazing that you think rape by the husband would not count. You said, "Is a pregnancy really forced on women?" In the case of rape, even by the husband, yes it is!
(c) why wait until a pregnancy test shows pregnancy? If the 'morning after pill' is not available, then there is nothing to stop a woman asking for a 'scrape' (the lining of the womb scraped)employed to solve a whole range gynaecological problems?
And how is that not murder in your book? If it is murder to have an abortion (and I believe morning after pills are illegal in Ireland), then you are advocating murder by other means. Instead of "why not have a scrape?" why not have an abortion? What's the frigging difference?
(d) what percentage of pregnancies are due to rape?
Irrelevant to my point. You asked, " Is a pregnancy really forced on women?" and I point out that yes, in some cases, it is forced on a woman.
(e) do you believe that people conceived of rape (whether husband and wife, date rape or stranger rape) are lesser citizens than 'wanted' babies?
Nope. Nothing I have said suggests that. I am pointing out that you are wrong with your rhetorical question, "Is a pregnancy really forced on women?" Yes, it is. In some cases.
I have already stated in my post: "Let’s say in cases where it is forced on women - rape - and the foetus has yet to develop a central nervous system."
I specifically added that to close off any sophistry about how children born of rape are lesser humans. I am in favour of abortion on demand up to a certain point. When it comes to the foetus having no brain or central nervous system there is no ethical conundrum regarding life from the feotus's perspective, because there is no perspective.
Bear in mind, the question posed was, whose rights was the other poster referring to, when he or she said that everybodys' rights are important and have to be balanced, therefore he or she was joyous at the 'yes' vote.
I don't know. Wriggle all you like, because I was addressing your question, "Is a pregnancy really forced on women?"
Can you really answer that even in cases of rape, pregnancy is not forced on a woman?