Merged Abolute proof UAL 175 never struck WTC tower 2

[332nd]

If you can say a video like this is not proof than I can say no audio of the tower collapses is not disproof of a demolition.

Sure you wanna make that trade?

What?

 

[JSSTyger]

If you can say a video like this is not proof than I can say no audio of the tower collapses is not disproof of a demolition.

Sure you wanna make that trade?

I mean...if you do want to make that trade I have 118 witness standing in line to testify to explosions.

 

[The Big Dog]

Hell, I'll go one step further, not only does that video show UA 175 in the air, it appears also to show the last plot for AA11. In other words, your video shows that both AA11 and UA 175 are hanging in the air over New York!

So I gotta ask you: do you know how flight explorer works; and how it works when the data is interrupted?

 

[Arus808]

I mean...if you do want to make that trade I have 118 witness standing in line to testify to explosions.

actually no, you have 118 (and there are many more) witnesses testifying that what they heard SOUNDED LIKE explosions.

Are you one of those troofers that do not understand what a simile is?

 

[Drudgewire]

I mean...if you do want to make that trade I have 118 witness standing in line to testify to explosions.

Only bombs can possibly cause explosions.

Yay, we're going further down the timeline. Happy 2004!!

 

[Bobert]

Ooooh, mad libs. http://www.lethalwrestling.com/upload/haw.gif








More please.

I just spit up sun chips all over my keyboard!
Thanks!

 

[332nd]

Hell, I'll go one step further, not only does that video show UA 175 in the air, it appears also to shown the last plot for AA11. In other words, your video shows that both AA11 and UA 175 are hanging in the air over New York!

So I gotta ask you: do you know how flight explorer works; and how it works when the data is interrupted?

If can you see that I need to talking the school into getting me a better computer. I'll have to remember to take another look at this when I get home.

 

[JSSTyger]

The plane is far far north of the towers....not hovering around them

 

[Bobert]

If you can say a video like this is not proof than I can say no audio of the tower collapses is not disproof of a demolition.

Sure you wanna make that trade?

If a truther takes a bong hit in the forest and no one is around does he still hear the voices in his head?

 

[Arus808]

And these two important questions go unanswered:

do you know how flight explorer works; and how it works when the data is interrupted?

 

[The Big Dog]

The plane is far far north of the towers....not hovering around them

And I have shown you that the locations of those two planes correspond with the flight paths for AA11 and UA 175 and the last data points for those two planes.

So I gotta ask you:

do you know how flight explorer works; and how it works when the data is interrupted?

 

[332nd]

And these two important questions go unanswered:

do you know how flight explorer works; and how it works when the data is interrupted?

I don't know, but I would love to know.

 

[JSSTyger]

The plane is far far north of the towers....not hovering around them

Infact the plane is almost right at the border with Connecticut...headed back to its take off site (Boston Logan) like its supposed to.

 

[JSSTyger]

And I have shown you that the locations of those two planes correspond with the flight paths for AA11 and UA 175 and the last data points for those two planes.

So I gotta ask you:

do you know how flight explorer works; and how it works when the data is interrupted?

Fine...then where is AA flight 11 and why do you say it is still hovering around manhattan when Flight 175 (which arrived later) has fled Manhattan

And no I do not know how flight explorer works

 

[RedIbis]

Infact the plane is almost right at the border with Connecticut...headed back to its take off site (Boston Logan) like its supposed to.

Could that be because the flight tracker will plot the flight path? Unlike a lot of people here, I'm not trying to take cheap shots. I'm curious about your video, but I think there may be some logical explanations.

 

[Arus808]

Fine...then where is AA flight 11 and why do you say it is still hovering around manhattan when Flight 175 (which arrived later) has fled Manhattan

And no I do not know how flight explorer works

if you dont know how it works, then how can you be sure that the data that it uses is the most current and up to date information? or that it could receive bad data, and interpret it wrong?

did you even read where I stated that following such data, can be wrong? Where I tracked my parent's flight, and it told me that they were still in the air, when THEY had already landed?

 

[A W Smith]

Golly Gee

You mean all that time that the faa flight controllers lost the identity of flight 175 they could have just picked it out using flight explorer and a mouse? Maybe you should point out this amazing software to the faa?

[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]Washington, D.C., September 9, 2005[/FONT] - Ten minutes after American Airlines Flight 11 crashed into the north tower of the World Trade Center on September 11, 2001, Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) controllers in New York saw United Airlines Flight 175 heading "right towards the city," [p.13] but thought it was aiming for an emergency landing at a New York airport, according to FAA documents released this week under the Freedom of Information Act and posted on the web by the National Security Archive. Minutes later, Flight 175 hit the south tower of the World Trade Center.

oh wait!

Sabre Flight Explorer provides the most accurate and reliable stream of air traffic data available in the industry. The data is based upon radar, satellite and other tracking information supplied by the FAA and other sources. Once Sabre Flight Explorer receives this data, it is processed and sent to the Sabre Flight Explorer client software via the Internet.
For subscribers to Honeywell GDC, Blue Sky Network, Sky Connect, Wingspeed or ACARS, additional flight tracking data outside our normal coverage area is sent to authorized users only.

Im pretty sure the FAA had other priorities that day other than to update data for third party's. like lets get all the friggin planes out of the sky.

 

[Bobert]

Infact the plane is almost right at the border with Connecticut...headed back to its take off site (Boston Logan) like its supposed to.

it flew back to Logan?
I supposse then that NO ONE would have noticed it landing?
I guess they put in operatives and killed all the passengers?
3 people can keep a secret as long as 2 of them are dead.

 

[applecorped]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6UuH6D4pob8

1) Tower 2 is down
2) Very few planes on the radar screen (for those who are still skeptical)
3) Plane is headed back to Boston (further proof the FAA had already given the command to ground all aircraft)
4) This is a national news media broadcast

Any questions?

What plane did crash into WTC2 & where did UAL 175 go?

 

[T.A.M.]

Call me skeptical but I scoff when I see any thread title that begins with the words "absolute proof."

Still, I think the video is interesting, but I can come up with innocuous explanation. MSNBC while broadcasting live, was not airing a live feed from the flight tracker.

Now, that's my initial thought. If there's evidence that the flight tracker is live, it is compelling evidence, but I suspect it's an issue of time delay.

My god Red, you are capable of debunking!

TAM