Merged Abolute proof UAL 175 never struck WTC tower 2

[Cheap Shot]

Unlovedrebel - Yes - that is the N175 (F?) that i was referring too. It also looks like it says 007 138 below.

The poster of this video femr2, and edited versions of it, clearly implies that this N175F information comes from FAA to flightexplorer via radar.

I'll give it a shot, my guess is that a controller started an additional track on UAL175 just in case they lost radar on the aircraft. UAL175 changed its beacon code to a different code during the Hijack. My guess when they started a new track they identified it with the "N" the reason why is in the ATC system requires all first characters to be an "ALPHA" character a "letter" not a number. The "F" at the end probably identified it as word Flight, so basically it was a ghost track. The "007" is probably the computer ID associated with the track, and the 138 below, means the aircraft was descending below 13,800 ft. That altitude could be manually entered or it could have been a Mode C hit. The controller probablly entered this from his position and flight explorer like the TSD or ASD just takes a snapshot of what the controller is watching, nothing else.

 

[Jackanory]

Thanks Cheapshot. As usual, always a logical expanation.

 

[TJM]

Bump. Speaking of complete jokes.

 

[Baylor]

(Sorry for bumping such a stupid thread.)

little grey rabbit, read this thread.

 

[Thunder]

Was United flight 175 still in the air after South tower collapsed?



I watched the video. I paused it just as Olbermann clicks on that one plane.

And it does appear to say UAL 175. It does indeed say BOS and LAX.

so...what's the dilio? me funcused.

 

[BCR]

No. TSD coast track.

 

[Thunder]

No. TSD coast track.

please explain. slowly and thoroughly.

 

[BCR]

please explain. slowly and thoroughly.

Nah, You asked a simple question and I answered it simply. Search around, there is a thread on this here somewhere which addresses this ad nauseam.

 

[Thunder]

Nah, You asked a simple question and I answered it simply. Search around, there is a thread on this here somewhere which addresses this ad nauseam.

oh...sorry about that.

 

[BCR]

Here is one that goes on forever.
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=137237&highlight=flight+explorer

 

[Thunder]

ah, well, this video was very recently posted on WeAreChange. I guess they enjoy reposting long-debunked videos, cause they think/hope brainless people won't take the time to inquire as to its legitimacy.

 

[beachnut]

I watched the video. I paused it just as Olbermann clicks on that one plane.

And it does appear to say UAL 175. It does indeed say BOS and LAX.

so...what's the dilio? me funcused.

There is only one Flight 175, a physical aircraft, the tracking program is not real, it is based on data and algorithms; it was wrong after 175 went terrorist. The terrorists changed the squawk, and crashed. There are people who have been fooled by this "anomaly".

Like a navigator putting out a DR course, the Flight Explorer has algorithms/procedures when data is interrupted, or the system that feeds the data, etc.


You are right, they are recycling failed delusions almost 10 years rotten; desperation sets in as 911 truth zombie tour for summer 2011 begins.

 

[Thunder]

i will ask the mods to merge with the long-debunked thead.