And they were shattered and incinerated, not vaporized. You made that up, which is another way of saying you lied. How many lies do you have to tell for 9/11 "truth" Turbofan?
Why would the plane shattering mean the columns couldn't be damaged? What do you think damaged the columns Turbofan? Of course, you'll run away from that question also.
Is this how it works? Unless we can come up with a picture of every plane part you demand it means that Flight 77 didn't hit the Pentagon?
Why would you expect this instead of being broken into many small pieces. The plane did hit at several hundred miles per hour.
probably from the folks at PF "Truth"
???? are you kidding????
One of the wheel hubs ended up outside the C-ring hole. I'm sure the others were somewhere in the wreckage.
You've already been shown pics of the plane pieces. But a dishonest liar such as yourself won't acknowledge that.
Why would I have to do that? Is someone claiming an intact wing went through the wall?
I'm having trouble understanding how shattering something reduces its mass. Maybe you'd like to explain?
So a 757 could not cause that damage, but some other type of airplane could?
Where are the pieces of an airplane not consistent with Flight 77?You've already been shown pics of airplane parts, some with the AA logo intact. Why would you think large sections would survive such a high-speed impact intact?You bet. That's sort of how proof beyond a reasonable doubt works!
Show me some large tail sections, fuselage sections, engines, etc!
Show me how those wings pass through a wall , but can cut steel columns!
SO, where did all the buildings and terrain come from? What about their elevations? Or is that part of the FDR data as well?Working copy
What about the FDR file and tab file which support the animation? Are the
acutal FDR files working copies too? LMAO!
See above. There is more in that animation than just an airplane flying around.
You are basing your fictional scenario on an overlay that doesn't take into account the angle the aircraft struck building. If the aircraft went straight into the building at a right angle, then you might have something. Remember, there were no high speed cameras there to record the event. So, what happened to the aircraft during those tenths of a second from the time the engine impacted the generator till the tail hit the building is not known. So, there is no way any of the many eyewitnesses that you completely ignore to accurately describe what happened.
Hmmm, no fire truck, no fire. Not exactly minutes.
Only magical to the conspiracy liars such as yourself that refuse to accept reality.
You haven't presented any statements from any of the witnesses I named. The evidence is not limited; all evidence of what happened at the Pentagon is on the table, and you have yet to present the statements of any of those 1,000+ eyewitnesses. Since the physical evidence of what wreckage was recovered at the Pentagon is critical to understanding the events of 9/11, and you have indicated there are "questions" about the wreckage in this very thread, you must necessarily know what those 1,000+ people saw, or recovered, or sorted openly on the Pentagon lawn.
Who says it suddenly changes? Show that everything was accurate throughout the entire animation. Just because the runway was accurate would mean that the entire data set for the terrain would also be accurate.
All that does match the REAL angle that the aircraft struck the building
Only if the aircraft struck at a right angle. The tip would have hit the building first, and if he was already starting tho roll to the right, then that could have easily been accelerated.
Nobody is saying that it did. Please provide proof that the wing has the same mass throughout it's length to cause the entire wing to to through the wall.
So you are ignoring the plethora of photos of debris just because you only have one photo that was taken at some point in time after the fire truck was no longer needed and before the collapse.Oh, so they cleaned up all the debris while they were putting out the fire
with foam? Perhaps before while the fire was still roaring? LMFAO!
So you expect them to just leave everything in place for how much time?Sorry Mr. selective detective,
Mineta's timeline contradicts the arrival time of Cheney to the PEOC. Mineta
is on video confirming this; it's not hearsay!
It doesn't surprise me that you are not aware of this.
Still wanting to know why the plane wasn't shot down if the order was given?
Your country was under attack (known since second tower strike),
and nobody could figure out how to hit a commercial airliner circling over
restricted airspace with the world's most sophisticated defence system?
Have you taken the hook out of your mouth yet?
